>>724146814
mom NTR is a weird one where its like seven degrees of logical jumps needed to make the NTR work. It's essentially a frued/incest genre twist, where the NTR/theft sets up the immediate implication that it's not just a normal healthy mom/son relationship but a stealing of affection from a more Freudian/sexual nature.
For non mind broken perverts, momNTR is ridiculous on its onset because there's no theft. It's a 'yeah my mom is a grown woman and has gotten dicked before, because I was born, and ostensibly might be dicked again one day'. But that's not what we're working with here.
In this case Ash may or may not have intimate feelings towards his mom, but it's an implied more intimate affection/relationship. Oak comes in and replaces him in the dynamic, and Ash becomes the secondary.
>>724147251
Case in point. Yes. She is a single woman. Contextually, any son should not be mindbroken or sexually cucked by his mom having sex, especially with a man her age. Now, if it was GARY? We'd be at least dealing with some trad psychology. But momNTR requires you to self insert as sexually attracted to your BIOLOGICAL mom.
