Thread 724192165

I've already played most of the one pre 2000s.

Here are the parameters:
Strong Puzzle or Platforming focus. Respects these concepts as mechanics. So:

No Action Adventure games where youre solving a 10 minute puzzle ever 3 hours in a 10 to 15 hour game.

No automatic "push up to platform" platforming.

No "burn the web with fire puzzles". I dont fucking care if your game later on has ONE DUNGEON where you play around with puzzles so you think your retarded low IQ ass is actually solving puzzles (Looking at Darksiders retards) The very fact that you can ONLY ever bring up that one level as proof that the majority of the game isnt "Use X ability here on obvious interactable think". Is very much proof that the majority of the game is "Use X here".

No "floaty" platforming. What do I mean? I mean the type of platforming where youre jumping across giant platforms, and you have a convenient ability where you can always just glide enough to close that gap incase you misjudged distance. The same applies even if you dont have floaty platforming, but the jump is always so simple, that youre either expected to just "avoid the laser grid that is coming towards you, with only an obviously specific amount of space with no laser where you need to position yourself to avoid". I'm thinking of games like Beyond Good and Evil and Rayman 2 here.

Discuss. Videogamers on the /v/ideogame board for talking about videogames and nothing else.

Portal 2 is basically your only option

Portal is one of those games that's more of a puzzle game than adventure game if that makes sense

>>724192764
just realized i forgot to respond to the actual post. lll redo this thread later since its a failure

>>724192165 (OP)
>Strong Puzzle or Platforming focus.
trash games.
want to do puzzles? open a book on cryptograms or better yet something like hartshorne.

there are no video games with puzzles worth doing.

>>724195102
why are you a retard? i bet you think ocarina of time is a good game too

>>724192165 (OP)
Did you play Kameo?

>>724195419
Yes. Game is shit. Ive been searching for true adventure games a while now. I appreciate the recc though. Too much combat focus in Kameo for a game with shit combat, and there arent much interesting puzzles that cant be reduced to "Use X ability here".

>>724195359
>"i want to solve children's puzzles" -you
bro really going around calling others retards

>>724195796
hunh? are you retarded? read op again and think about why i brought up oot

>>724196378
>can't even coherently articulate it
hey how about you learn to write complete sentences, puzzle game enjoyer?

you're not "deep" or "edgy", you're lazy. use your words to write your meanings in text on the screen. basic communication principles.

i will say again. there is no video game with a puzzle worth doing. it's all extremely primitive, childish nonsense. if you like puzzles, don't play games. liking game puzzles is like liking visual novels - just a worse version of reading a book.

Yeah I honestly can't think of anything that fits all of your criteria OP. 3D adventure platformer basically leaves you with Mario and the other classic platformers. 3D adventure games with puzzles will almost always be like OoT or Darksiders. Anything good trying to fit in your criteria would be a 2D game.

>>724197214
>Yeah I honestly can't think of anything that fits all of your criteria OP.
yeah...i thought so unfortunately. it might just be expecting too much of the videogame industry
>Anything good trying to fit in your criteria would be a 2D game.
Got any ideas then? might aswell hear some out

>>724197575
Wario Land 4 might be closest match

>>724197575
maybe Limbo?

>>724197993
Interesting. Would Little Nightmares apply too?
>>724197918
Will check that out. Genuinely appreciate that you gave a specific Wario Land rather than the entire series, implies that you actually read what I said, since often I have to prod people for whether its worth starting with the first game of a series or not since /v/tards can be uppity

Nobody thought of Luigis Mansion? Honestly an underrated suggestion. The sequels have much more creative puzzles and interactions, so you should be fine to start with the sequels rather than the first game (its also short)

final bumptasy