Thread 724576085

>it's the developer, not the engine
name 5 well optimized UE5 games

>>724576085 (OP)
>name 5 well optimized UE5 games
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

>>724576085 (OP)
Alters

all that i've tried worked on my old ass computer. that's enough optimization for me

>>724576085 (OP)
This year's GOTY, Expedition 33

That counts as 5

>>724576085 (OP)
The finals, Arc Raiders,Expedition 33, Marvel Rivals, Pseudoregalia, Split Fiction, Satisfactory, Valorant, Tekken 8, Infinity Nikki.

>>724576381
I want to call you a faggot but I won't do that.
That games stutters a lot even on my 7800X3D.
It was even worse on a r5 5600.
Fun game but it's not running well.

It's easy, you download unreal 4.27, create a project, select forward render and then disable every fucking meme features the engine has!
Once thats done you upgrade it to an ue5 project :^)

>>724576739
E33 runs pretty bad for how it looks, same for marvel rivals. E33 is full of lumen ghosting too.
Pseudoregalia is a game with N64 graphics but requires a modern GPU to run.
Arc and Split Fiction run good, haven't played the rest.

>>724576085 (OP)
The Finals and Tormented Souls 2.

>>724576737
>>724576739
E33

You people are high. Game sutters and is basically impossible to remove lumen ghosting. It looks terrible.

>>724577163
I heard people were having issues with E33 but I personally didn't. It ran at 144 2k for my whole playthrough and never dropped frames. I got 1 crash when walking into Gross Titty, but outside of that nothing. I have an amd card but I did hear from my Nvidia friends that they were having trouble. Rivals is made to run on pretty much anything I know people who play it on a toaster. Low poly aside the game still ran perfectly fine and OP was just asking for examples not examples of games with high graphical fidelity. I'm mostly just exhausted of all the UE5 hate when plenty of games run it fine. At least for my midrange PC

>>724577248
>it looks like shit
Irrelevant to the discussion. That's an opinion
>It stutters
What are your pc specs I didn't have any issues

>>724577248
I tried to fix graphics in that game with mods but it's impossible.
I've spent more time tweaking the game than actually playing it.

>>724577662
I have a 5090 and 5950X.

>That's an opinion
Making something that looks like shit run well isn't an accomplishment. That isn't optimization.

>>724577679
I gave up as well. With the poor lipsync and ghosting I gave up hoping for a patch or mods to fix it but it never came. Maybe I'll just have to wait 10 years for a remaster.

>>724577248
I just put up with it until I finished the game. Pretty sure it dipped below 60 in the overworld using 4k/DLSS performance with a 4080 and it doesn't look like some graphical marvel.
The graphics were very "fuzzy", idk how to explain it.

>>724576085 (OP)
Optimized UE5 games do not exist.

>>724576737
>Expedition 33
runs like shit on steam deck

>>724578185
It's 2025, steam deck is low-end hardware and Unreal 5 is the future.

>>724578352
The future is Unreal Engine 6. Games looking the same as 2015, stuttering more than ever and requiring an RTX 7090 for stable 60fps.

>>724578352
your mother is lowe end. if it can run emulated switch games that look better than expedition 33 then the fault is with the developer not the hardware

>>724576085 (OP)
name 5 optimized modern game

>>724578430
>switch looking better than anything
Let's not get hyperbolic.

>>724576737
E33 isn't well optimized. I can't even imagine how bad other games must be when this classifies as well optimized.

>>724578527
Alan Wake 2
Kingdom Come 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Ninja Gaiden 4
Last Deus Ex.

>>724578569
https://youtu.be/CgZe43uIk18?t=37

this literally looks better than any unreal game ever made fcking weirdo. ignore the "colors" and look at the path tracing emulated visuals. yes its cartoony but fcking so is expedition 33 with its crappy lambert.

this game
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1639790/Northern_Journey/

>>724578527
Most games that are not on UE5.
From this year on the top of my head dynasty warriors origins, KCD2, BF6, DL the beast. Stellar blade on UE4.

>>724578715
>aw2
>ng4
u are fucking insane or what? the 2nd game u mention looks from a bygone era and demands extremely high end hardware to run at 1440p and 2160p at native.

>>724578861
Works on my machine.

>>724578916
it doesnt. i actually played it and burst out laughing when i saw the performance in the empty tutorial room with 1 enemy. you get more frames in rdr2 at double the resolution.

>>724576085 (OP)
Fortnite
Ark
Marvel Rivals
Dragon Ball SZ
Unreal Tournament 5

>>724580061
>ark and rivals
>well optimized

>>724576737
The game is 10/10 but the performance isn't good. The maps (outside the low res overworld) are tiny and it should run perfectly in 4k on years old hardware. Some of the dogshit elements of UE5 are mitigated by mods but you'll need years of autism for fans to get rid of them, or the devs would have to do it themselves as a goty update.
Also not strictly related to performance but UE5 HDR is horrendous so it's deactivated for E33 because they didn't do their own implementation even though it would be one of the games to benefit the most from it.

>>724577902
>I have a 5090 and 5950X.
Lower settings to medium. UE5 is a futureproof engine, it's not meant to run on current mid hardware

>>724582516
>5090
>mid hardware
Like pottery.

>>724582671
What pottery? Lower the settings and you'll see an improvement in performance. This is basic stuff. Are you a consoleturd or something? Do you not know what settings are?

>>724581473
that's on UE4, and has stutters

>>724576085 (OP)
Jackie Chan

>>724582824
Not on my pc also the 2 is ue5

i dont know why you retards have so many problems with UE games. i literally just play any modern game like wukong or wuchang or e33, i max out absolutely everything, turn on DLSS, and it just looks perfect with high frame rates on my 3000 series cards. what the fuck are you retards doing that causes so many problems?

these retards have no x3d cpu thats why theyre stuttering

>>724576085 (OP)
Its funny that this wasn't an issue UNTIL UE5, and now its not UE5s fault.
>nuh uh, unoptimized games have existed forever.
Never have we seen such an outpouring of unoptimized games strictly on one engine.

>>724576085 (OP)
Did you really get mad because you got proven wrong with ARC riders?

>>724585332
This game proves why we should get rid of lumen and nanite, the main selling points of UE5.

>>724576737
Threat interactive debunked this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls4QS3F8rJU

>>724576934
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxyL3Ymbwn4

>>724582516
>>724582815
>E33 is a well optimized game
>Lower the settings and your 5090 won't chug
Kek the best part is that I know for a fact you're not trolling

>>724576085 (OP)
Honestly? I have a 5080 paired with a 9800x3D. I don't need optimisation.
At least not yet.

>>724576085 (OP)
Show proof you've played any UE5 games, señor phoneposter.

>>724589467
no phone, just too lazy to change file names

>>724591457
why are you doing this to yourself? im not playing a "hero shooter" unless it has fucking TF2 levels of detail

>>724585213
Nigger, before the UE5 hate train it was Unity that was widely recognized as the dogshit engine

>>724576085 (OP)
Lies of P was pretty well optimized. I ran it on a poverty tier 1660 + Haswell setup

>>724591868
You mean unless it is tf2, right anon?

>>724578861
NG4 runs great for me

t. 5 year old 3070/5600x build

>>724593434
Because it was UE4. Still not perfect either.

>>724577163
>Pseudoregalia is a game with N64 graphics but requires a modern GPU to run.
It says it requires a GTX1660 at minimum. I think at the very least all it needs is a GPU that can handle DX11 but a 1660 is probably what the dev made it on so they can't really claim it runs on anything weaker. But if you're gaming on anything worse than a 1660 in 2025 then you're not white and you don't deserve to be playing video games.

>>724593938
Nobody said anything about optimizations. You use an engine because it does all the background work that'll take 90% of your dev time.

>>724593539
no, i havent touched tf2 in years
but id rather play tf2 than this garbage

>>724585213
what's funny is that these issues arose around the same time nvidia drivers started getting shitty, but no one is blaming it on nvidia, despite these ue5 games performing just fine on AMD.
fortnite is a good example. myriad of issues on nvidia, zero issues on amd.

>IT'S THE DEVS
>IT'S BAD HARDWARE
>IT'S NVIDIA
What kind of coping mechanism is this and does it run at 5FPS like everything else on UE5?

>>724594558
No. It is the fault of the engine if the default and suggested way of working results in an explosion of shaders that the engine can't handle. Among other problems. Which is why CD Projekt has to implement completely new systems with Epic to make it actually feasible as an open world engine despite it being sold as one from the start.

>>724593938
What >>724594315 said, and most custom-rolled rendering engines look and perform like absolute dogshit beyond their little tech demos.
>>724585213
>engine advertises itself on next-gen visuals
>developers use it for its next-gen visuals
>mid-range PCs from 2018 can't run it maxed out
It is a mystery. My RTX4060 runs most of these games at high settings between 60-90FPS. 3rd world niggers are outing themselves in these threads.

>>724576085 (OP)
The developer isn't entirely free of blame. A lot of them that use Unreal Engine 4/5 actually don't know anything about optimisation. Which is why it's a recipe for disaster, even more so. It becomes a deadly combination.

>>724593596
ur capping bruh. on the 3070 it averages 44 fps at 1440p. the game looks like it should run at triple the fps easily.

https://youtu.be/4bMB2BR4WGM?t=140

fortnite
fortnite racers
fortnite lego
fortnite concert
fortnite creative

>>724593938
>just write your own 3d renderer, asset serializer, collision response system, level editor, input backend, animation system, and level streaming system BEFORE you work on the game you want to make.
Fuck off. I want a little complexity in the games I make.

>>724595564
Even Fortnite runs like shit.

>>724595727
>Even Fortnite runs like shit.

>>724595824
I don't think you're supposed to post your own selfie when you're seething.

>>724595903
>so butthurt all he can say is no u

>>724595824
>brownoid calling others brownoids to deflect the conversation away from the fact UE5 is actually a dogshit engine
Never not funny

Daily remember this is 10 year old game almost 11 now and it runs at 144fps+ at 4k ultra and 200fps+ with modern hardware at 1080p.

Modern games are so bad I wont even pirate them. Fuck UE5. I have not played a single UE5 game.

>>724596780
based
btw i would kindly piss on those trees. they look beautiful and thats the most gratifying way to show respect to them

>>724576085 (OP)
>unreal tournament 2025
>splinter cell remake
>swat 5
>thief 5
>hnoaie5in34mokh'0th

>>724578057
why did /v/irgins used to hate on UE4? I recall someone saying that games made in it have a shared "feeling" or a "look", but I didn't play shit games so I never noticed such low-effort devwork.

>>724576085 (OP)
Runescape 3
Club Penguin
Moparscape
Super Mario Cryzenx
Vindictus Dying Fate