>>724658690
>Or if you're doing a comprehensive/first playthrough and not speedrunning.
These games just aren't that long if you've actually been playing them longer than a few years, especially not remakes which are primarily regurgitated shit anyways. I don't, say, skip the cutscenes in 7 or Village, but if I get annoyed in a remake I'll just start skipping them and not even read the files, because I don't need to care that deeply about them.
Anyways, of the games on there
>Resident Evil Code Veronica
Came out 25 years ago.
>Resident Evil (2002)
>Resident Evil Zero
Came out 23 years ago.
>Resident Evil 4 (2005)
Came out 20 years ago.
>Resident Evil 5
Came out 16 years ago.
>Resident Evil Revelations
>Resident Evil 6
Came out 13 years ago.
Those versions in there are all rereleases with the sole exception of one version of Resident Evil 5 and the decidedly modern games.
And those modern games aren't difficult or long. Resident Evil 7 only took as long as it did because I just wasn't interested in Madhouse until Not A Hero came out.
>The only legitimate criticism is the lack of route differences and the zapping system being gutted. Everything else in the remake is phenomenal.
If you're not interested in game design, sure.
The game's pacing is complete shit. Its enemy design is more laughable than it is scary by having the tankiest enemies in the series, and if you drop the difficulty, you get the lamest enemies in the series. It overuses the t-103 to an absurd degree while not making him that challenging or interesting. The game's level design falls apart immediately after the first RPD section and never recovers.
>You don't hate the terrible non-game that ruins everything RE is about
That's the remakes. They literally ruined the original games.
