Thread 725098368

You won't do shit.

Stop making threads!

Keep killing games.

>>725098413
I signed the initiative :^)

>>725098368 (OP)
>retards advocating for their rights being taken away

>>725099563
kek

>>725098368 (OP)
did anything ever happen to that initiative or is it just dead now?

>>725098368 (OP)
>Live in Bongistan
>Goverment debate stop killing games
>Starts off strong: loads of MPs on the side of the iniative, all raising good points VS literally 1 guy just saying "its bad".
>MPs worry this rule will effect their new online safety act (somehow); where you need to give up your ID to 3rd parties to access anything NSFW.
>Motion fails as a result.
>4Chan likely to be ISP blocked by start of next year here due to online Safety act.

I hate this country so fucking much, I want out.

>>725100946
>MPs worry this rule will effect their new online safety act (somehow)
>>Motion fails as a result.
good fucking lord, i do not envy you euros in the slightest.

>>725100070
The bong branch denied it again while claiming that it would be unsafe for children due to private servers not being moderated by the big corpo.
The EU (Main) one is still on the table and awaits the verdict, but the chances there are better because at least it had some big govnames support during the campaign, unlike UK where the government did all it could to not allow the petition in the first place with redtape and wrong wording.

why are browns so obsessed with this shit

>>725102095
they have no impulse control so they buy shit scam games and cry for the gubberment to [GIBS DEM DAT!] when the consequence of the scam finally bites them in the ass.

>>725102186
The government's job is to prevent scams in the first place by law, rajeesh.

>>725102041
bonglanders are so cucked
what the fuck happened?

>>725102219
if that was the goal then they'd outlaw FOMO marketing practices.
the equivalent here would be if you gave every senile old fuck a "HELP ME I GOT SCAMMED!" button that instantly deposited $1K into their bank account.

>>725102095
The inability to understand business or the reality of things not lasting forever.

>>725102095
>if you don't like corpos stealing from you... you're brown!
how's that boot tasting?

>>725102404
If you were stolen from by purchasing a copy of a multiplayer game with so few players that server shutdown was imminent that's on you.

There's only two reasons anybody takes the side of the corporations in this situation:
>you're a shill
>you're a spiteful misanthrope who wants others to suffer
I have never suffered from a game shutting down. I have also never done meth. I still think it should be illegal.

>>725102540
No more games Will

>>725098368 (OP)
Except Nortubel

>>725102540
>you think the value of Ubisoft games being preserved is lower than the potential value lost by forcing new regulations onto everyone else
There's also the distaste people have for the petition and how it only gained steam through twitch drama. Most supporters were twitch kiddies who wanted to sacrifice a streamer to the corn, not because of anything the petition was actually asking for.

>>725102774
And most Americans were just retarded English outlaws who didnt really care for all the freedumbs and shit promised when they boarded onto Mayflower because they were fucking outlaws.
Welcome to how every cause, no matter good or bad, works, retard - 20% people who want it, 80% public masses who just move it forward and may begin to want it in the process.

>>725102774
It is not enough to sacrifice Pirate Software to the corn, I need to see someone eat his heart.

>>725099556
which rights?

>>725102540
>you're a spiteful misanthrope who wants others to suffer
you got me there, but you have to remember that the vast majority of these "games" are skinnerboxes wrapped around a basic bitch shooter. nothing of value is lost if the games get shut down.
what i want is for these mouth breathing apes we call humans to learn through the pain that games getting shut down inflicts on them, because its the only way they can learn.
dont like it when GaaS games get shut down? go play a game with dedicated servers as the norm.
all SKG does is remove that pain, and ensures that the average normalnigger will never learn.

>>725103186
The right to play Ubisoft games alone in multiplayer lobbies forever.

>>725102774
>Most supporters were twitch kiddies who wanted to sacrifice a streamer to the corn, not because of anything the petition was actually asking for
Philippians 1:15-19

>>725102318
t. bootlicker

>>725103306
You're comparing a shitty petition whipped up by a retard who was mad he couldn't play The Crew to the word of Christ.

>>725102095
no such thing as a free lunch but try telling that to afriniggers who have been getting free lunch for >50 years

>>725103243
>and ensures that the average normalnigger will never learn
hate to break it to you, but this won't ever happen no matter what
all that's happening is normalfags have less money and corporations have more

>>725103636
>but this won't ever happen no matter what
and so i want them to suffer like the misanthrope i am.
can you blame me?

>>725103451
The point is: regardless of motives of supporters the good cause is moved forward

>>725103673
yes, it's crab bucket mentality and benefits people that are actively malicious, while hurting normalfags who are simply stupid
it isn't like laughing at a rockslide killing people, it's like laughing at a murderer killing people

I'm amazed at the beaten wives syndrome in this thread
>I'M SORRY COMPANY, I WAS A BAD CUSTOMER, IT'S ALL MY FAULT, NOT YOURS, I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER

>>725103636
Potentially punishing the rest of the industry because of Ubisoft, a company that won't exist in a few years, shut down multiplayer games is not the way to corral normalfags into not being scammedby buying functioning games from bad companies who will shut them off long after the normalfag forgets about them.
>>725103764
I don't consider it the good cause. The good cause would be preventing companies from forcing their single player games to require a server connection at all times. That would lead to preservation of the portions of games that actually have a good reason to be preserved. Online games aren't meant to last forever. They're usually made to be temporary money extraction machines. Fix the single player issue first, get an easy win. Then move to regulation for legal protection for private servers.

>>725103920
>it's like laughing at a murderer killing people
to be fair the murderer placed a "if you press this i will murder you" button in town square and after years of murder people are still pressing the fucking button.

>>725104018
Amazing victim blaming
>the murder doing the killing isn't wrong, it's the people being murdered who are wrong

>>725102540
nah i didn't sign the petition because petitions are useless. nothing ever happens from them, they're a tool used to calm down the masses by giving them the illusion of influence.

>>725104095
>can't tell the difference between a petition and a citizen initiative

>>725104092
STOP BUYING BAD GAMES AND YOU WONT NEED TO DEAL WITH THEM GETTING SHUT DOWN YOU FUCKING NORMALNIGGER RETARD.

>>725104092
They continue instigating the murder by pressing the button while cheering every time the murderer shows up. They still get excited whenever companies who are proven to be shitty release some slop multiplayer game history shows will be shut down in a few years. These consumers clearly don't care about being protected.

>>725104006
>The good cause would be preventing companies from forcing their single player games to require a server connection at all times.
Which is... what the petition is calling for.
So you have no clue what the fuck you are talking about. Eat shit.

>>725104252
Americans are awake, SKG threads instantly get filled with bad faith actors.

>>725104252
It has that as a provision. It's also asking for companies to distribute their fucking server files when they shut multiplayer games down like it's 2002 and everything is still peer to peer with matchmaking lobbies instead of centralized microtransaction hell.

>>725104719
>t's also asking for companies to distribute their fucking server files when they shut multiplayer games down
I know, based! You're saying it as if it was a bad thing.

>>725104719
Its merely one of the solutions you fucking retard. The only requirement is that it remains playable after the company ends support. It could be the GW1 situation or just making it offline for all we know, as long as you can actually get to the fucking game.

Not to mention that by nature of such laws it only applies to future games, which means they would HAVE to be developed that way from the start. If anything it might bring back peer to peer into the masses instead of having this matchmaking fuckery everywhere since thats the easiest option.

>>725104814
It would be based. But it's a poison pill that ruins the rest of what could have been an easy regulation to pass. It opens the whole thing up to endless scrutiny from copyright lawyers who will throw it into legal hell. The part I both want and think would be actionable is being jeopardized because a drooling retard who has never had to deal with lawyers saddled it with a legal quagmire. And the people who could implement the initiative likely aren't going to know where to split it to get just the actionable parts implemented quickly.

Thread theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bgoezd6Q2M&list=RD1Bgoezd6Q2M

>"SKG is just Ross knowing nothing about law and doing it all by himself" drivel again
Just shut the fuck up and do your research faggot.

>>725098368 (OP)
Nobody cares about games being killed.

>>725102293
>what the fuck happened?
What do you mean? They've always been atrocious, they're basically proto-americans, a social engineering project