people who hate food analogies are just revealing they cannot perform analogies in general (a heavy sign of low IQ). the idea of a scenario being abstracted then reimagined with different objects/entities instead is a perfectly fine thing to do, we often do this to attempt to help someone imagine something.
>oh, you haven't played x game before? well, it's kind of like y game with a medieval setting instead.
food is just an item we consume everyday by necessity, therefore it's easy to relate many qualities about it too (time of cooking, flavor/taste, quantity, etc)
>x game is like an artisanal meal, whereas y game is like low quality fast food
>x game is like a niche fragrance that takes a deep appreciation for the craft to enjoy, whereas y game is like a mass appeal fragrance that anyone can enjoy
these aren't bad analogies, they're easy to understand and relate things elegantly. your hatred for food analogies only reveals your own inability to grasp them, and your own low intelligence. it also reeks of 'newfag trying to fit in', since it also goes along with 'mutts le bad' too.
>oh, you haven't played x game before? well, it's kind of like y game with a medieval setting instead.
food is just an item we consume everyday by necessity, therefore it's easy to relate many qualities about it too (time of cooking, flavor/taste, quantity, etc)
>x game is like an artisanal meal, whereas y game is like low quality fast food
>x game is like a niche fragrance that takes a deep appreciation for the craft to enjoy, whereas y game is like a mass appeal fragrance that anyone can enjoy
these aren't bad analogies, they're easy to understand and relate things elegantly. your hatred for food analogies only reveals your own inability to grasp them, and your own low intelligence. it also reeks of 'newfag trying to fit in', since it also goes along with 'mutts le bad' too.
