>needs to post off-model fanart to prove a point
here's what your "bro" actually looks like, anon
no cool angular/spiky head wings, no cool detailed back wings, no feathers seamlessly integrated with the neckline, no cool floaty pose, no cute facial proportions, no glow effect on the tail gem
if you have to misrepresent a design in order to make it look cool, you've already lost
>>58027060
that's because they did. Writing morbid dex entries in sun/moon didn't work to make people stop wanting megas so now they'll just make every new mega as shitty as possible so people stop asking
>>58027040
its amazing how much posing and artstyle can improve modern and ruin older designs. picrel and OP dont fix the designs but they bring them up to gen 4 or 5 standards at least.
>>58027331
yes but slightly less so. these techniques can help but wont pull off miracles. >>58027363
yeah it doesn't help the comparison when mega charizard fared best in both og and this artist's re-pose.
There are probably better examples but I don't have them.
>>58027437
there's nothing wrong with pointing out the generation that turned the franchise into slop. If this bothers you maybe you should dilate and develop better taste
>>58027463 >i-it's shit on purpose!!
this argument has already been debunked multiple times, you retards have been using it since at least gen 4, why do you keep using it?