← Home ← Back to /vp/

Thread 58128181

19 posts 2 images /vp/
Anonymous No.58128181 >>58128196 >>58128207 >>58128219 >>58128247 >>58129694
What was Pokemon like before Wolfe Glick?
Anonymous No.58128190
it was slightly less faggoty
Anonymous No.58128196
>>58128181 (OP)
Being terrorized by Verlisify
Anonymous No.58128207
>>58128181 (OP)
I know this is a troll, but WolfeGlick arguably contributed a lot to get people into VGC. Something lazy ass Pokemon Company never did.
Anonymous No.58128219 >>58128231
>>58128181 (OP)
>What was Pokemon like before competitive faggotry?
Better.
Anonymous No.58128222
>Asks a question
>Gosh, you are so a troll
Why is vp like this
Anonymous No.58128231 >>58129730
>>58128219
Theres been official competitive since gen 1, zoomoid, in fact that was why stadium was made and why the original only has competitive fully evolved pokemon
Anonymous No.58128240 >>58128260
Another Wolfe seethe thread?
I wont watch your shitty youtube channel you furry fucker
You know who you are
Anonymous No.58128247 >>58128272
>>58128181 (OP)
So how did the VGC change?
Anonymous No.58128260 >>58128280 >>58129658
>>58128240
If he didn't want to get mocked on vp maybe he shouldn't of lost at Worlds on the 1st day
Anonymous No.58128272
>>58128247
He made it more popular. Ever since he made his channel, VGC has seen a sharp steady increase in players.
Anonymous No.58128280 >>58128285
>>58128260
It's not his fault he lost. Just because you're one of the greatest players of all time, doesn't mean you're gonna win every game. Players make mistakes.
Anonymous No.58128285 >>58128295
>>58128280
>It's not his fault he lost.
what do you mean it's not his fault
did someone else lose for him
Anonymous No.58128295 >>58128341
>>58128285
Pokemon by its RNG nature means you will inevitably lose sometimes even if you're the better player. Being the best is about win rate, not winning everything with no mistakes, that kind of dominance can only exist in stuff like fighting games (and even then its rare)
Anonymous No.58128299
If we blame RNG every time we lose we also should give the win to RNG rather than ourselves too
Anonymous No.58128341
>>58128295
100%, competitive pokemon is an exercise in masochism, it's like playing the slots. The dopamine hit for reading your opponent and making a correct but risky play is immense, but other times you do, your 95% accurate attack misses anyways, and you lose
Anonymous No.58129658
>>58128260
I thought he made it to the second day and got eliminated before the final phase at 6-3 or something. Either way you do have to get lucky to win at worlds since the average player is better and nobody is phoning it in with shitmon meme teams. Besides ever since he started his channel just getting to worlds makes him more money through the video for it than he would have made from winning the entire tournament.
Anonymous No.58129694
>>58128181 (OP)
Better. I mean he was still around during gen IV and V but VGC was smaller.
Anonymous No.58129730
>>58128231
They didn't let it affect game design as much back then. In gen 9 it feels like there are 50 Pokémon with special snowflake abilities meant to be specific competitive niches. Granted I haven't played gen 9 so I don't know about the normal pokemon but it feels ridiculous at this point how they stopped catering to anyone who isn't a 5 year old, shiny hunter or vgc player.