>>58131590
>it's okay that you're objectively going to be paying more for less
Yup, uh-huh, glad to see that a $70-80 Pokemon game will have less content than its $60 predecessors from the very last console, and that's not even getting into the 3DS and DS games.
Remember when we at least expected a Battle Tower iteration at the bare minimum? Now we can't even get that as of SV, they WILL take away more.