← Home ← Back to /vp/

Thread 58134527

26 posts 4 images /vp/
Anonymous No.58134527 >>58134549 >>58134586 >>58134589 >>58134987 >>58134991
THE ERA OF POKEMON AS WE KNOW IT IS OVER.
YOU WANT TO PLAY TURN BASED POKEMON? WELL YEAH PLAY CHAMPIONS.

NIGGER I AINT A COMP NIGGER.

>WELL WE ARE WORKING ON GEN10 WITH MORE INTERACTIVE FEATURES THAN EVER
TURN BASED?
>NOPE

FUCK OFF GAMEFREAK PISS OF SHIT.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous No.58134549 >>58134554
>>58134527 (OP)
>NIGGER I AINT A COMP NIGGER.
What a dumb mindset. If you love the turn based mechanics so much then you should have already been playing with them in the competitive formats.
Anonymous No.58134554 >>58135084
>>58134549
GOD FORBID I AM JUST AN AUTISTIC CASUAL WITH LACK OF MOTORSKILLS WHERE I COULD CASUALLY ENJOY PRESSING A WHILE SELF INSERTING MYSELF IN MY LITTLE WORLD OF POKEMON WITHOUT BEING INTO FUCKING ANALYTICAL COMP BULLSHIT
Anonymous No.58134577
Why are turn chuds like this
Anonymous No.58134586 >>58134638
>>58134527 (OP)
Let GameFreak cook, give real-time battles a chance. Turn-based is a relic of a 2D, handheld, bygone era.
Anonymous No.58134589
>>58134527 (OP)
Will game freak kill off SHITHIA for good or what
Anonymous No.58134623 >>58134915 >>58134966 >>58135047
Zoomers finally ruined this franchise
Anonymous No.58134638 >>58134657
>>58134586
>Turn-based is a relic of a 2D, handheld, bygone era.
Not OP, nor am I against these changes, but this is untrue. There is absolutely still a market for turn-based games.
Anonymous No.58134657 >>58134939
>>58134638
You can always play past games, chud and if you feel the competitive itch you got champions now.
Pokemon is no final fantasy game. You just press A and move on. You wanna do your nuzlock stuff? you can still do it, you just have to be more reactive now if we move into becoming an ARPG series.
Just imagine how cool it would be for terrains and environment to matter. Like imagine the anime series you grew up with, seeing Ash comboing and chaining moves together that have synergy, imagine you can pull this off someday too. Imagine activate commanding your Pokemon to dodge. Trust me, this is hype!!!
Anonymous No.58134915
>>58134623
Basado, 28 year old zoomchad here
Anonymous No.58134939
>>58134657
Did you not read my post?
Anonymous No.58134966 >>58135032
>>58134623
millenials ruined it when they trashed black and white for daring to not have zubat, geodude, and pikachu. You can literally see where they tried to appease in bw2 by loading it with old mons and adding more features than ever and only a little into xy's development they gave up because nobody cared.
Anonymous No.58134986
Why don't people realize how brilliant the current direction with the series is? Champions exists to keep the turn based combat systems alive while the mainline games are free to experiment as they please. I've always said that videogame series reinventing the wheel like this can be really stupid but they've taken out all the risk with Champions.
Anonymous No.58134987
>>58134527 (OP)
They stole this play style from palworld. They should sue pokemon.
Anonymous No.58134991
>>58134527 (OP)
>TURN BASED?
if ZA does better than SV, would that means no one cares about pokemon turn base?

>but competitive?
you mean full grow adults that never learn any marketable skill?
Anonymous No.58134995 >>58135109 >>58135112
is this why Palworld made them mad
were they already planning on ditching turn based gameplay completely in mainline
Anonymous No.58135032 >>58135071
>>58134966
>lets get rid of past Pokemons that made the franchise
Of course BW would be shittalked for years to come you dumb ngubu
Anonymous No.58135047
>>58134623
If you're going to bitch about generations you should at least bitch at the right ones. You're thinking of Gen Alpha, the tablet kids game series are having trouble with hooking.
Anonymous No.58135071 >>58135099
>>58135032
>get rid of
Did you HONESTLY only ever use previous mons every new game? Did you HONESTLY even use them at all? Every new gen I would use only mons from that new gen up until alolan forms where I made an exception to use alolan muk. Having 156 (realistically, what, 120 new mons you'd actually have access to? 100 minimum) mons to choose from, you STILL wanted to use zubat, geodude, pikachu? Even knowing you could transfer them over like always unlike after dexit? This has always been a bizarre stance, almost indefensible. Why even bother adding new pokemon then if nobody uses them? Gamefreak gave up on that after gen 5 too because of arguments like this. Just such a stupid opinion to hold. I even get it if you don't like a significant amount of unova mons, especially because it kind lf frontloaded a lot of the more controversial designs like woobat, timburr, etc, but that alone is not enough to justify "but I want to specifically run into zubat and geodude instead".
Anonymous No.58135084
>>58134554
BASED AND JUSTIFIED CRASHOUT!!! TALK THAT TALK KING!!!!!
Anonymous No.58135099 >>58135105 >>58135111
>>58135071
I'd honestly prefer if they drastically cut down on making new Pokémon and forms going forward, instead favoring gameplay and graphical elements.
Most nu-gen mons are ugly forgettable filler anyway...
Anonymous No.58135105
>>58135099
>not getting new mons in a monster series
You might want to go and check out Dragon quest
Anonymous No.58135109 >>58135113
>>58134995
>is this why Palworld made them mad
honesly I can see it ever since the first gameplay of ZA dropped, Palworld combat looks more alive even without the player fighting. heck Digimon World 1 looks more refined
Anonymous No.58135111
>>58135099
>instead favoring gameplay and graphical elements.
that is literally what they've been doing since gen 6 and it's been a mistake to dig deeper every single gen
Anonymous No.58135112
>>58134995
This sounds likely. Palworld has sniped them and rendered them unoriginal.
Anonymous No.58135113
>>58135109
>Digimon World 1 looks more refined
Ok this shit is bait