← Home ← Back to /vp/

Thread 58137087

41 posts 22 images /vp/
Anonymous No.58137087 >>58137100 >>58137108 >>58137122 >>58137228 >>58137283 >>58139129
3D WAS A MIStAkE
Anonymous No.58137100
>>58137087 (OP)
Fit that to a grid of 64x64 tiles.
Anonymous No.58137108 >>58138209
>>58137087 (OP)
Anonymous No.58137116 >>58137125
No, shitheads thinking Game Freak were ANY cop at spriteworking were.
Anonymous No.58137122
>>58137087 (OP)
>This stale bait again
Anonymous No.58137125 >>58137167
>>58137116
>thirdie ESLs hate RSE
Anonymous No.58137167 >>58138249
>>58137125
My brother in christ, Game Freak existed for 12 years as an actual game development studio by the time they released RS and THAT is the best they could manage, despite the other two studios that made those listed games ALSO being around for NES/Famicom days, ALSO releasing games for it and also continuing to develop games for the intervening 12 years since Game Freak were established and absolutely markedly improving from first release on NES to their GBA efforts. I'm not interested recognising the delusions of spastic fuckers whop just want to go back to being 7 an not having an evil orange costing them every red cent they can grub.
Anonymous No.58137228 >>58137513
>>58137087 (OP)
The games never looked like this and never would've.
Anonymous No.58137238
2D looks way better
Anonymous No.58137283 >>58137555
>>58137087 (OP)
2D on high resolution is really hard to pull off. It would most likely look really empty
Anonymous No.58137469
i hate 2d
Anonymous No.58137513 >>58137613 >>58138129 >>58138281 >>58138414
>>58137228
doesn't change the fact that those pixelart fanarts look more soulful than the actual thing
Anonymous No.58137555 >>58137616
>>58137283
Easier than making 3D look good desu
Anonymous No.58137567
i'd love to see a remake 2d in high resolution, but I don't think they are gonna make one
Anonymous No.58137613
>>58137513
That's my exact point though. The games never looked this soulful and never would've even if the series stayed 2d.
Anonymous No.58137616 >>58137705
>>58137555
3D looked good on their first fucking try while Gen 5 looked like dogshit. So evidently not.
Anonymous No.58137705
>>58137616
t. gen 6 faggot
Anonymous No.58138129 >>58138256
>>58137513
Anonymous No.58138209 >>58138226
>>58137108
>Anti-Unova genwarfaggotry out of nowhere
It's a mental illness
Anonymous No.58138226 >>58138995 >>58139096
>>58138209
>out of nowhere
gen 5 is the most recent 2D game
if the most recent 2D game didn’t look like OP’s image then there’s no reason to assume going back to 2D would magically be like OP’s image

hope this helps
Anonymous No.58138243
3d or 2d it doesnt matter, pokemon is shit, global woke series now
Anonymous No.58138249 >>58138879
>>58137167
>THAT is the best they could manage
it was great
look at this
comfy
soulful
beautiful
Anonymous No.58138256 >>58138385
>>58138129
left is so detailed that it becomes difficult to make things out at that resolution
high fidelity isn't the best for this platform
Anonymous No.58138281 >>58138710
>>58137513
Yeah, the gameboy color had limitations that modern hardware doesn't. Nothing is preventing someone from making a game that looks like the fanart today, it'd just be a monumental task to create all the art with animations and layer it properly in their engine of choice. The time investment vs profit makes it a poor choice for devs who could be working on something that'll put food on the table so those who're most capable of it WOULD not, but they very well COULD.
Anonymous No.58138385 >>58138392
>>58138256
yeah if you're a fucking retard
Anonymous No.58138392
>>58138385
so like genwunners, hoenn babies and johtoddlers who want these pics? lol, shuddup
Anonymous No.58138414
>>58137513
you are comparing what someone can do in Photoshop on a computer with 64GB of ram to a supercharged game and watch from the 90s
Anonymous No.58138710 >>58138790
>>58138281
this anon is right and I would pay big to see it happen
seriously $200-$500 is how much i would put down on a beautiful pixel-art pokemon remake
Anonymous No.58138790
>>58138710
> $200-$500
Lol. Id just pirate like I do everything.
Anonymous No.58138879 >>58138897
>>58138249
looks like shit
Anonymous No.58138897 >>58138921 >>58138929
>>58138879
k
Anonymous No.58138921 >>58139122 >>58139143
>>58138897
>johto kanto alola that low
What a shithole that site is
Anonymous No.58138929
>>58138897
Anonymous No.58138995
>>58138226
gen 5 came out in 2012 (latest point)
The premise of OP is that if 3D was never switched to, we
-'d still be getting more new 2d games, which would look like OP instead of what we get now, which looks much worse.

Here's a thought experiment: Imagine RBY was an SNES title or something and was always 3d until XY, which switched to 2D. All the 2D games would look better than the 3D ones purely by virtue of being newer. You'd be there screeching that 2D was a mistake and we wouldn't understand why you would say such a thing since all the 3D games would look worse than all the 2D games, including the most recent 3D game.
Anonymous No.58139096 >>58139117
>>58138226
everything gen4 onwards is 3d, you retard
Anonymous No.58139117
>>58139096
>MC, NPC's and pokΓ©mon are still sprites
This is why they get called "2.5D" kid. Because despite the 3D buildings, the focus of the games resolutely remained in 2 dimensions. they only became 3D when the 3DS released and suddenly EVERYTHING was represented with a 3D model.
Anonymous No.58139122 >>58139126
>>58138921
Johto should be lower. Its fans are the new insufferable genwunners from 2008.
Anonymous No.58139126
>>58139122
ok hoenn baby
Anonymous No.58139129
>>58137087 (OP)
Johto if it were a good game
Anonymous No.58139139
Anonymous No.58139143
>>58138921
alola fucking sucks