>>58246260
this seems so off-base as to be trolling. Let's go from the top.
Statement 1; original post responding to OP, likely irrelevant here
>Ever since I learned normal people like things if they're exposed to it more because of a psychological hangup I have been disgusted.
Statement 2: mocking reply, likely irrelevant here
>Oh you think that since normal people are psychologically predisposed to like things they're exposed to, that that's BAD? Yeah well that just means you're a sniveling autistic manchild who's unwilling to change opinions.
Statement 3: Another anon chiming in with a separate point, first relevant post in the chain seemingly
>We're genetically predisposed to believe certain things and we should trust our instincts because peer pressure is often detrimental.
Statements 4 - 9: ad hominem back and forth
>ends on "Point out the logical flaw"
Statement 10: Presumably your first post
>Tolerance != immunity. If something is bad for you inherently, you won't be able to stomach it for long, even if you like it, genuinely. (not true btw)
Statement 11 (me): Did you not understand Statement 3?
>Statement 3 is claiming that kneeling to peer pressure can hurt you, but you're saying that things that are natural can ALSO hurt you, so you should just... follow peer pressure? Do whatever you want? Seems like a non-point.
Statement 12: Clarification
>When I said statement 10, what I meant was that you're naturally genetically predisposed to believe certain things and we should trust our instincts because peer pressure is often detrimental.
Statement 13: My newest response
>see below
That is LITERALLY statement 3, I copied and pasted it because you changed what you said to mean something identical to what you were disagreeing with, now...
