← Home ← Back to /vp/

Thread 58592801

49 posts 22 images /vp/
Anonymous No.58592801 [Report] >>58592817 >>58592842 >>58592918 >>58593530 >>58593567 >>58593574 >>58594633 >>58594834
>this is what borts want pokemon to look like
Anonymous No.58592808 [Report]
Correct.
Anonymous No.58592817 [Report] >>58592854
>>58592801 (OP)
now show it in motion.
Anonymous No.58592840 [Report] >>58593548 >>58594841
The rotation causing pixel artifacting was never an issue with BW's artstyle, in motion and on a DS screen, it looked perfectly fine.
The problem was backsprites reverting to the Gen 1 mode of being 2x size, so giant pixels.
Simply making the backsprites twice as large wouldnt have helped because the camera zooms out a lot and it would look weird with the front sprites of the opponents.
Really if they hadnt jumped to 3D, I imagine having two sprites for everything, a normal one and 2x res one, and swapping between them on the fly, or using some clever algorithm to blend between them as needed based on camera distance, would have been the logical next step to clean up the visuals.
Anonymous No.58592842 [Report]
>>58592801 (OP)
now show barbaracle and mega tyranitar, in motion
Anonymous No.58592854 [Report] >>58593556
>>58592817
I can't seem to find the pokerogue sprites in motion
Anonymous No.58592918 [Report] >>58592924
>>58592801 (OP)
Anonymous No.58592924 [Report] >>58593584 >>58593768
>>58592918
>gen 6 out of nowhere
gen 1-4 sprites > gen 6+ models > gen 5 sprites
Anonymous No.58593530 [Report]
>>58592801 (OP)
Yes, but only for 1/60 of a second.
Anonymous No.58593548 [Report]
>>58592840
>in motion and on a DS screen, it looked perfectly fine
get better standards
Anonymous No.58593556 [Report] >>58593561
>>58592854
so you're presenting this in bad faith then.
Anonymous No.58593561 [Report] >>58593562 >>58593607
>>58593556
posting it in motion isn’t going to magically make it look good
Anonymous No.58593562 [Report] >>58593564
>>58593561
well post it in motion and prove that then. otherwise you're arguing in bad faith.
Anonymous No.58593564 [Report] >>58594622
>>58593562
the fact that that frame exists is proof it looks bad in motion
Anonymous No.58593567 [Report]
>>58592801 (OP)
I'd rather just have metagross with extra spikes removed.
Even recreating it as a sprite can't make this dogshit look appealing
Anonymous No.58593574 [Report]
>>58592801 (OP)
Since it's not a gen 5 sprite I don't think this is what borts what pokemon to look like at all. What retard thought there were megas in gen 5?
Anonymous No.58593584 [Report] >>58594640
>>58592924
>Gen 1 Sprites ranked tied for number 1
Anonymous No.58593607 [Report] >>58593654 >>58593664 >>58593696 >>58594581
>>58593561
>postng it in motion isn't going to magically make it look good
Glad we can agree, xy looks horrid.
Anonymous No.58593654 [Report] >>58594846
>>58593607
Anonymous No.58593664 [Report] >>58593672 >>58593704
>>58593607
Your point doesn’t work when you post a model that objectively looks fine.
Anonymous No.58593672 [Report] >>58593681 >>58593696
>>58593664
I was just agreeing with you though?
Anonymous No.58593681 [Report]
>>58593672
No, because I said the bad looking sprite looks bad. Meanwhile you keep posting good looking models while suggesting they’re magically bad.
Anonymous No.58593696 [Report] >>58593700 >>58594581
>>58593672
>>58593607
They look worse in motion, creatures inc should be hung for this.
Anonymous No.58593700 [Report] >>58593711
>>58593696
Glad we agree gen 5 Pokemon sprites are hideous in all states.
Anonymous No.58593704 [Report] >>58593712 >>58593726 >>58594663
>>58593664
Why do people on this website not know what the word objectively means?
Anonymous No.58593711 [Report] >>58593774
>>58593700
That's what i'm talking about, no wonder everyone hates xy now, they should have went 3d in the switch era where they could have done it properly, instead XY gives those absolute jokes models with worse animation, have you seen skarmory it just hovers in place not even flying, what trash.
Good we can understand this.
Anonymous No.58593712 [Report]
>>58593704
>>>/lit/24862979 basically.
Anonymous No.58593726 [Report]
>>58593704
What in the post implies the word was used incorrectly?
Anonymous No.58593735 [Report]
shartranny thread
Anonymous No.58593756 [Report]
Hey can you post some bait in the Crystal thread on /vr/
Anonymous No.58593768 [Report]
>>58592924
RG > 2 > 4 > 'za > 3 > PLA > SV > 6-7 = 5 > RB
Anonymous No.58593774 [Report] >>58594104 >>58594108
>>58593711
>have you seen skarmory it just hovers in place not even flying,
?
Anonymous No.58594104 [Report]
>>58593774
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcmLs9uVsJs
Anonymous No.58594108 [Report] >>58594844
>>58593774
Sorry, forgot the timestamp.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcmLs9uVsJs&t=134
Anonymous No.58594581 [Report]
>>58593607
>>58593696
OK now post it in ACTION
Anonymous No.58594622 [Report]
>>58593564
>I've never heard of tweening and I hope you haven't either
Anonymous No.58594633 [Report]
>>58592801 (OP)
Yes. 3D killed the series.
Anonymous No.58594640 [Report]
>>58593584
soul
Anonymous No.58594663 [Report]
>>58593704
Because you and many other retards keeping engaging with yawnfag bait
Anonymous No.58594834 [Report] >>58594837
>>58592801 (OP)
Gen 5 is the best generation but you'll never see me defend the graphics. GF's shit has always ranged from unimpressive to ugly, even in the 2D games, no matter how hard nostalgiafags try to pretend those were somehow different. The only thing I'll give it is that the seasons looked nice.
The Ranger games are what the mainline games should have looked like on the DS if they were dead-set on not switching to 3D yet.
Anonymous No.58594837 [Report]
>>58594834
i just want to go back to unova
Anonymous No.58594841 [Report] >>58594877
>>58592840
Also using old pixelarts.
Almost all gen 5 pokemon animations look great
Anonymous No.58594844 [Report]
>>58594108
>dived
Anonymous No.58594846 [Report]
>>58593654
>Celophane flames stuck to neck
>Textured eyes
Garbage
Anonymous No.58594877 [Report] >>58594889
>>58594841
>Almost all gen 5 pokemon animations look great
get better standards
Anonymous No.58594889 [Report] >>58594897
>>58594877
yeah that's definitely not true
gen 5 pokemon sure
Anonymous No.58594897 [Report] >>58594903
>>58594889
>gen 5 pokemon
>looking good
L M A F O get some taste bort
Anonymous No.58594903 [Report] >>58594956
>>58594897
?
Anonymous No.58594956 [Report]
>>58594903
You can go in any thread on this board and see this same guy making the same autistic genwar shit even when nobody mentions gen 5. Don't waste your time argueing with him, he's probably brown or underage.