>>11918631
I'd be more than OK with allowing DS/PSP discussions here. Hell, I think the date limit for those systems, along with the PS2, should be 2010, and not December 2007.
PC on the other hand, I think the limit should be dialed back to 2006 or even 2005, because with the current rules, we get far too much crossover with the 360 and PS3.
>>11918741
"Retro" as a general concept IS subjective, but this board's rules aren't. They're based on the subjective interpretation of "retro" of the people who wrote them, but as they stand they're set in stone.