← Home ← Back to /vr/

Thread 11919814

29 posts 10 images /vr/
Anonymous No.11919814 [Report] >>11919827 >>11919860 >>11919936 >>11919960 >>11920893 >>11921849
Game with zero flaws
Except for Sector B it sucks
And also being able to fall off of Silence for no reason
Anonymous No.11919827 [Report] >>11919829 >>11919852 >>11919870 >>11919965 >>11919975 >>11922381 >>11927289
>>11919814 (OP)
>no flaws
>looks like a PS1 launch title
A hideously ugly video game. Aesthetics are half the fun of futuristic racers and it fails that test miserably. Tendies only pretend to like it better than GX so that they don't have to admit that Sega did a Nintendo franchise better than Nintendo ever did.
Anonymous No.11919829 [Report] >>11928307
>>11919827
>Aesthetics are half the fun of futuristic racers
they transferred that half of the fun into the gameplay
Anonymous No.11919852 [Report]
>>11919827
It might look bad in screenshots, but in motion, particularly with the camera angles and overall presentation, it looks very cool.
Anonymous No.11919860 [Report]
>>11919814 (OP)
I don't think the F stands for flaw
Anonymous No.11919870 [Report] >>11919925
>>11919827
It's okay Anon, you don't have to be so insecure after Sega lost the console war and went out of hardware business.
Anonymous No.11919925 [Report]
>>11919870
Auster is not a Sega fan.
Anonymous No.11919936 [Report]
>>11919814 (OP)
The only 2 N64 games that I’m comfortable with saying are the best of their respective series are F-Zero X and Star Fox 64.
Anonymous No.11919960 [Report]
>>11919814 (OP)
>And also being able to fall off of Silence for no reason
Hold up on the control stick when you're going fast right before the starting line.
Anonymous No.11919965 [Report]
>>11919827
do you want 60fps or not?
Anonymous No.11919975 [Report] >>11920042
>>11919827
F-Zero X is very clean looking, you're delusional. If it were a PSX game, it would have ugly warped textures swimming all over the screen.
Anonymous No.11920042 [Report] >>11920049 >>11920171 >>11920226 >>11922381
>>11919975
>F-Zero X is very clean looking
Now there's some real fucking delusion. It's a blurry mess on original hardware, like everything else on the N64 because it has the worst video output of any console ever made.
>muh emulation
Sure, we'll just emulate the PS1 too then and clear any texture warping right up.
Anonymous No.11920049 [Report]
>>11920042
No it isn't. It is extremely easy to read on a real console. But let's be real, you don't play any of these games anyway.
Anonymous No.11920171 [Report]
>>11920042
>because it has the worst video output of any console ever made
The PS2 says hello.
Anonymous No.11920226 [Report]
>>11920042
How old are you?
Anonymous No.11920893 [Report]
>>11919814 (OP)
I originally passed up on it but eventually I got my copy from a sale for $40 ish (don't remember exact price)
I've always loved arcade racers and this is really one of the best of that generation.
SEGA's effort comes close, but was hurt by limited content
Anonymous No.11921849 [Report]
>>11919814 (OP)
>Game with zero flaws
>lists flaws
Thread discarded
Anonymous No.11921857 [Report] >>11921932
Sand Ocean 3 in the expansion kit is ass cancer.
Anonymous No.11921932 [Report]
>>11921857
If we're going by expansion pack then Silence 3 is kinda boring unless you're really good at insane dive bullshit
Anonymous No.11922381 [Report] >>11923089
>>11919827
>>11920042
https://i.imgur.com/KgPI0rF.mp4
Anonymous No.11923089 [Report] >>11924272
>>11922381
Anonymous No.11924004 [Report]
Anonymous No.11924272 [Report]
>>11923089
t. can't handle composite video
Anonymous No.11924317 [Report]
love the drifting
Anonymous No.11926793 [Report] >>11927170
kinda
QKN No.11926848 [Report]
Perfect game is perfect.
Anonymous No.11927170 [Report]
>>11926793
This game's flaw is that it's fucking boring
It has a 10 chapter long unskippable tutorial and yes the Eliwood chapters afterwards are boring too
FE6 has a much better difficulty level
Anonymous No.11927289 [Report]
>>11919827
You've never played this game, have you.
Anonymous No.11928307 [Report]
>>11919829
/thread