>>11954387
ugly
music too whiny (no seriously, the music is written well, and modern arrangements are great, but that actual execution in game is way too whiny/grating in the tones)
needless cutscenes that take too long (like doors locking behind you)
chests taking too long to open, and needlessly repetitive text boxes (like for bombs)
text speed too slow and you cant skip it
combat being distinctly separate from exploring/puzzles
shitty non-puzzles (hurr durr, look up)
absolutely garbage combat and non-threatening enemies
item swapping is slow and clunky.
vast, empty areas to waste your time.
the controls have not really aged well either.
and i've probably forgotten a few others. but regardless, any and all of these points will be utterly rejected by the oot zealot. they arent even CONSIDERED, and oot must remain 10/10 perfect game to them. to them, no game has better puzzles. no game has better combat. no game has better anything. or laughably, the biggest huff of copium of all "well other games might do one or two things better, but none of them are 'the complete package'." as if whatever zelda does is automatically and inherently the best list of things that a video game CAN be.
and no, i will not attempt to put forth a "replacement" title for what "should" be considered the best game ever. im not narcissistic enough to make such a stupid claim when there are so many variables to consider.
