Anonymous
8/27/2025, 9:15:59 PM
No.11981890
>>11981896
>>11981924
>>11981932
>>11981970
>>11983967
>>11983993
N64's record-breaking launch
>The console was first released in Japan on June 23, 1996.[3] Though the initial shipment of 300,000 units sold out on the first day, Nintendo successfully avoided a repeat of the Super Famicom launch day pandemonium, in part by using a wider retail network which included convenience stores.[51] The remaining 200,000 units of the first production run shipped on June 26 and 30, with almost all of them reserved ahead of time.[52]
>Its American launch was wildly successful, breaking records - its first day sales were significantly higher than PlayStation's and Saturn's respective launches the year before.[57]
>Time named it the 1996 Machine of the Year, saying the machine had "done to video-gaming what the 707 did to air travel". The magazine said the console achieved "the most realistic and compelling three-dimensional experience ever presented by a computer". Time credited the Nintendo 64 with revitalizing the video game market, "rescuing this industry from the dustbin of entertainment history". The magazine suggested that the Nintendo 64 would play a major role in introducing children to digital technology in the final years of the 20th century.
How did the Nintendo 64 have such a successful launch and yet still fail?
It's not a case like 6th gen where PS2 was the clear winner from day 1. Nintendo had every advantage on their side and were poised to win, but by 1998 they were well behind the PS1. Was it arrogance?
>Its American launch was wildly successful, breaking records - its first day sales were significantly higher than PlayStation's and Saturn's respective launches the year before.[57]
>Time named it the 1996 Machine of the Year, saying the machine had "done to video-gaming what the 707 did to air travel". The magazine said the console achieved "the most realistic and compelling three-dimensional experience ever presented by a computer". Time credited the Nintendo 64 with revitalizing the video game market, "rescuing this industry from the dustbin of entertainment history". The magazine suggested that the Nintendo 64 would play a major role in introducing children to digital technology in the final years of the 20th century.
How did the Nintendo 64 have such a successful launch and yet still fail?
It's not a case like 6th gen where PS2 was the clear winner from day 1. Nintendo had every advantage on their side and were poised to win, but by 1998 they were well behind the PS1. Was it arrogance?