← Home ← Back to /vr/

Thread 11983639

18 posts 6 images /vr/
Anonymous No.11983639 >>11983649 >>11983668 >>11984119 >>11984132 >>11984141 >>11984217
There is not a single bad /vr/ beat'em'up or shoot'em'up.
There are mediocre games of these genres, sure. But a truly bad one? Nonexistent.
Anonymous No.11983640 >>11983645
Euroshmup
Anonymous No.11983645
>>11983640
All mediocre at worst.
Anonymous No.11983648
Trevor McFur
Anonymous No.11983649 >>11984443
>>11983639 (OP)
Fuck off, frog posting retard
Anonymous No.11983668
>>11983639 (OP)
Fuck on, frog posting genius
Anonymous No.11983847 >>11984443
Another retarded thread with an empty purpose. Sasuga frogfucker.
Anonymous No.11984038
Street Fighter 2010
Anonymous No.11984109
And you played them all?
Anonymous No.11984119
>>11983639 (OP)
There is not a single bad /vr/ frog thread.
There are mediocre threads of this genre, sure. But a truly bad one? Nonexistent.
Anonymous No.11984132
>>11983639 (OP)
I dont know, I'm actually not a fan of a lot of the Konami arcade beatemups besides TiT.
>inb4 Simpsons Arcade
Man has you played it lately? Once the novelty of it bring early Simpsons tuns off, it's a really weak beatemup
Anonymous No.11984141 >>11984143
>>11983639 (OP)
There are some really shitty beat em ups
https://youtu.be/0Blom1-b1RU?si=GlR4T7rRbXWRT92C
Anonymous No.11984143
>>11984141
https://youtu.be/VKwQF0dT65I?si=0VKE-0EOGf2DgfEP
Anonymous No.11984217 >>11984434
>>11983639 (OP)
shmups are trash and a niche of a niche
the only ones still playing them today are japanese that focused on 1 or 2 games in the last 20 years, adderal pill popping autists, or touhou fags that think they are playing a shmup

the genre was never good or popular, even their own community doesnt play them, they'll talk about literally anything else than play a shmup
Anonymous No.11984434 >>11984663 >>11984674
>>11984217
you already posted this before.
Anonymous No.11984443
>>11983649
>>11983847
I always bump frog chad threads
Anonymous No.11984663
>>11984434
literally not me retard
Anonymous No.11984674
>>11984434
Even if that was the same anon, it doesn't make it any less true. Actually more impressive if it's two different anons coming to the same conclusion.