Thread 12010515

bloody 'ell this is the dog's dinner

>xbox 360

>>>/v/

>>12010516
it was supposed to be on xbox so don't look at that bit

>>12010515 (OP)
Kameo is kino
still waiting on a sequel

>>12010516
It's a 2005 launching game you retard
>>12010540
>waiting on a sequel
good luck convincing Rare from doing absolutely nothing besides updating that online game about pirates

>>12010557
>Retro gaming means platforms launched in 2001 and earlier
>360 was released in 2005
Not retro

>>12010563
it might as well be retro though right?

>>12010563
Who defines what is and isn't retro? If you go by gamestop standards, it is.

>>12010563
>This board is for the discussion of classic, or "retro" games, including consoles, computer games, arcade games (including pinball) and any other forms of video games. Retro gaming means platforms launched in 2001 and earlier, and official game titles for those platforms released no later than December 2007 (homebrew console games made after this date will be permitted). The Microsoft Xbox, Nintendo GameCube, Nintendo Game Boy Advance, and Sony PlayStation 2 will now be considered "retro".

>>12010515 (OP)
kameo is a nice game ok, pls drop dead

>>12010540
this>>12010595
>it might as well be retro though right?
true

360 is retro everywhere but here it realsed over 20 years aho, literally a lifetime for some people.

>>12010563
retarded anon doesn't understand the concept of time

>muh 20 years
no one actually thinks gears of war is going to be a "retro game" in a few months. its completely indistinguishable from modern video games

>>12010563
>>12010642
There's a Halo Master Chief Collection thread >>12003451
Shut your ugly ass up, autistic faggot.

>>12010673
>no one actually thinks gears of war is going to be a "retro game" in a few months
Gears Reloaded (GoW 2nd remastered) flopped hard because it feels outdated and old. Niggers are wilding about it; they want a remake, not a remastered because is a 20yo game, old man.

>>12010682
dont know anything about that but i just find it dumb to consider a 20 year range the cutoff of what is and isnt retro because vidya games have not changed in the past 20 years the way they did in the previous 20. someone from 1985 shown a 2005 video game would not be able to believe their eyes. there was a huge leap in technology. if you show a person from 2005 a game from today, they are fundamentally the same thing.