>>12026595 (OP)
Literally nothing would change.
No European market for DQ or Nintendo, so that's an immediate bust.
In North America though, lets presume DQV releases in line with past DQ titles, which would put it around a 1993/94 release date.
It would not go over well.
If it's a Dragon Warrior game, then it'd be the fifth title in a series that was severely underperforming, being outclassed by its contemporaries, and it'd look like absolute shit at the height of SNES/Genesis graphicswhoring.
If it was rebranded to just "Dragon Quest: Hand of the Heavenly Bride", like how Euros handled DQVIII, it'd probably still do shit due to the weak graphics and it not being a very interesting JRPG compared to contemporaries.
There was never any "saving DQ in the west" without erasing the entire history of DQ outside Japan. Here's how I'd handle it
>do not release any NES Dragon Quest titles, by the time they got around to it it was already too late
>pick up Dragon Quest 1&2 remakes on SNES and release them under the name "Dragon Quest" with a subtitle like "Scions of Roto"
>pick up the DQIII remake, drop the number, release it in English
But, you run into an inevitable issue- the PSX. Dragon Quest did not get a mainline game on PSX until 2000. You cannot go backwards and release V as it looks outdated compared to the remakes. You could release VI after III, but not before as that confuses the "narrative", 1-3 tell a complete story, 6 exists outside that.
But, theoretically
>Release VI after III, sometime in 1996/7, drop the number
>Release IV's PSX remake, again no number, right in 2001 day and date with Japan
>push the DQV PS2 remake to Western audiences, no number
And through this, we frankenstein the second trilogy, ironically in chronological order without too much shuffling. VII would be skipped but it's a necessary sacrifice to not confuse franchise identity.
Saying ALL of that- the franchise would still bomb.