Thread 12091571

Where do these raw sprites come from?
They aren't 1:1 with the originals, visible here with the hair pattern and finger colors.
Not to mention the lack of shadow and how a bunch of the sprites are from the CGX with the black background yet they have outlines.

idk but does that site still block your ip if you click on a link to it from 4chan?

>>12091571 (OP)
those hippies are way too fat

>tcrf
literal furry tranny site

>>12091608
If it didn’t affect the data then it doesn’t matter.

>>12091608
If it doesn’t affect the data then it doesn’t matter.

>>12091608
I stopped using it the moment they started displaying mental illness flags on their logo.

>>12091575
I dunno, but I browse the site too often to want to test it out.
You figure a number of leaked prototypes they document there were source from 4chan, talk about ungrateful!

>>12091636
until one day they decide it does and purge whatever content they deem "problematic"

>>12091636
It does affect it though

>>12091608
So is the site you're using.

>>12091571 (OP)
There's a group of discord trannies still sitting on a massive pile of data from Zammis Clark's 2018 Nintendo hack(you know, where the 2020 "gigaleak" came from).

>>12091659
Predict what you think will get pruned first

>ALL games marked NSFL (https://tcrf.net/Category:NSFL_articles)
>Sakura Wars (can romance a child)
>Fire Emblem Fates (can romance a child)
>Famicom Detective Club Part II (makes fun of trans people)
>Duke Nukem Zero Hour (makes fun of trans people)
>Persona 4 (DOESN'T make fun of trans people, but brainlets believe it does anyways)

>>12092216
I should specify that these are my own predictions, I'm not asking you to choose from that list or anything like that.

>>12091608
I hate the owners too, but the site is still an interesting resource to me.

>>12091828
They should release it.

>>12091571 (OP)
The page for the scans and the page for the raw sprites were made by the same person, so they're probably manual recreations with some mistakes.

>>12091660
TCRF is not a review site. What content is left behind in video games is objective, the worst they can do is skip things they don't like. They can slap NSFW tags on it or add unsavory commentary, but this is not what you came for.

>>12091659
>>12092216
You’re getting mad at something that hasn’t happened and you’re making up.

>>12091575
>>12091647
This doesn't happen. Trust me. Would I lie?

>>12092576
The site did briefly IP ban you if it detected you came from a link from 4chan or KiwiFarms.

>>12092636
>The Farms
Okay, those edgy namefags can actually go fuck themselves.

>>12092576
It happened around June when they coated their site in pride months shit. They lifted it since.

>>12092695
Oh no. Is Super Mario gay now? Does it hurt?

>>12092704
You tell me.

>>12092216
>Sakura Wars (can romance a child)
>Fire Emblem Fates (can romance a child)
>implying they're against it

>>12091571 (OP)
To answer your question, the discord troon working on that awful Mother in EarthBound remake made them. He thinks he's an authority on the subject.

>>12092216
>that could have been me!

>>12092726
>>12093015
the wording on these is so unnecessary and masturbatory. i wish these people could see themselves the way normal people see them. no one needs these types of warnings anyway.

>>12093023
But anon, think of the children! They could be exposed to 4 pixels of boobs or foul language!!

>>12092216
>trans
>people

>>12092226
What's stopping people from copying the data to a new website? It's an open wiki and you should be able to export it.

>>12093015
>Oh wow.
Let's sit back for a moment and unpack this. Real talk.

>>12093041
it's a big wiki

>>12093089
for you

>>12093015
why is doing the good deed that is arresting a sick fuck suddenly not safe for life? are they projecting or do they have shitty diarrhea for brains?

>>12093106
The notion is that the subject may be uncomfortable for people who were themselves victims of that. Theoretically well meaning, but typically at least half the intent with content 'trigger warnings' is to virtue signal.

>>12093041
ostensibly he bans ips for "scalping" but even if that's true, you could just get a bunch of people to do it. it's not like he can sue them for it either

>>12093041
oof

>>12091608
Good for them, they do more than this shithole ever has.

>>12091608
>literal furry site
Why are furries so prevalent in computer and vidya spaces again? And it's not recent phenomenon either, they've been in major IT companies since the nineties. It feels sickening to share the same internet with them, even more so that these degenerates are employed in the industry at large.