>>12095584
>>12095757
>>12095759
I'm the anon that always makes the "negative copies sold!" claim. It comes from the game's entry on Nintendo Power's top 100 list. Basically, more people returned the game than bought it but that was only one week. I would assume that NP, given that they were part of Nintendo's marketing arm would know this.
I also believe it also had a very low print run and little marketing (an EGM review of the game states "Capcom isn't hyping this one. Why?"
Anyway I guess you'd ask WHY would so many people return it? Well as
>>12093709
states, you can actually finish the game very quickly. You get a "bad" ending but a lot of gamers would assume they had just beaten it. Even a full playthrough of the game is only about 2 hours long and while it's pretty tough, the only super challenging moment is the final boss, especially if you're a GnG vet.
So I think the "negative sales one week" is a combination of factors
>low print run and sales overall
>short game
>possible to "beat" the game very quickly
>also this game came out in late 1994 and there was a murderer's row of games coming out at this time. I could easily see someone beating this, returning it and then picking up DKC or FFIII