Thread 12154807

why do people pretend like this was a bad game?

It wasn't bad, the previous two were just better

>>12155242
fpbp
What I didn't get when playing it at first is why it looked worse graphically than the previous 2.
Then when looking up development history and learning that they had to change 6 months before release because the dark and edgy look wasn't going well with testers made sense.

>>12154807 (OP)
I recently replayed it and it was fun but too short

>>12154807 (OP)
>why do people pretend like this was a bad game?
it's an Ubislop game, ofc it's bad

>>12155454
Retard
Ubisoft used to be good once

>>12155471
they never made a good game
PooP was bad just like AssCreed

>>12154807 (OP)
it's very common for trilogies struggle with the third entry, it feeling alienating and disconnected, not sure why that is.

>>12155454
>>12155548
>not liking Rayman and Tom Clancy games
You have no soul

>>12154807 (OP)
It wasn't bad but I just don't remember it nearly as much.
>>12155242
This anon is probably correct. Its not good for a game if its very unmemorable. I only remember it was good but that is because it was based around the previous two games in its gameplay and level design.

>>12154807 (OP)
It's no worse than 2. 1 is all you need.

As fondly as people remember this trilogy, it seems like it never quite got where it was trying to get. all of these games are flawed