Thread 3809498

How much is too much for, lets say 45h RPG video game? Wheres whe line here

>>3809498 (OP)
What production value are we talking? RPG maker slop? Zero

>>3809498 (OP)
>noooo muh monies time value for muh monies!!!!
Yeah I don't worry about this because I'm not a brokie. $80 is less than a day's wages to most people living in the first world.

>>3809504
based /biz/bro

>>3809502
AA vidya i mean. Maybe some bigger indie stuff
>>3809504
Kek same argument again
>Im paying 10x asking price because i can afford it!
You guys are laughing stock for both brokies and actual wealthy people that know wasting your money without any solid purpose is plain stupid
What can i say: youre a good zoomie goy

>>3809758
You took your time

>>3809498 (OP)
45 hours of walking and having to read tedious dialog is not the same as 45 hours of high quality gameplay, so it depends on the game.
JRPGs are obviously the former

more than 0.00 is too much

>>3809498 (OP)
50 bucks for expedition 33 was a good fucking deal

>>3809504
>bragging about having zero sense or self respect
Knowingly spending more money than you ever should for a product or service doesn't make you cool, it makes you a fucking idiot. You sound like those gacha losers who love throwing hundreds at billion dollar companies for overpriced jpegs because they "can afford it".

>>3809735
AA doesn't exist anymore, so you're just emulating at this point

>>3809780
>That pajeet shilled FF bootleg
Pfffff, no wonder it got memoryholed after money for ads run thin kek

>>3809498 (OP)
You shouldn't look at game length as a metric. That's how we landed ourselves into Ubisoft open world situation. They're realistically 20-25 hour games stretched over 80+ hours.

>>3809798
Well that is a good poont but with what merit you want to judge if game is decent or not? No memes like "soul" or "Good"

>>3809811
it's a product that can be objectively judged on how well put together it is from programming, artistic, etc. perspectives. enjoyment of the game itself is after all entirely subjective.

>>3809812
Soo... Amount of money and time invested in making the product?

>>3809774
> I just enjoy theft!

>>3809498 (OP)
Depends how replayable it is. I'd say about 15-20 USD is okay. If it's very replayable and high quality $30-39 is acceptable.

>>3809897
>buy game, it's not even yours to keep
can't steal something that wasn't real to begin with

>>3810071
I only buy at -85% off or i "borrow" it to check if its worth the price. Very high price mind you, so it better be worth my time and effort to try it out or they wont get a penny. Keep trying DEI devs, maybe one day you gonna make it

>>3809735
>>3809787
Market sets the price poorfags, whining and crying about what the price "should" be is for faggot commies
>y-you probably spend thousands of dollars every month on games!
Brokie projection, I have never felt the need to buy more than 3-4 games per year at the very most. Why even buy more? That's months worth of entertainment if you select for games with depth and replay value. If you can't control your compulsion to play every single FOTM slop just buy a Gamepass subscription or something.

>>3809498 (OP)
Depends on a bunch of thing. Basically, it's "quality". Runtime is just one vector of evaluation.
I'd play full price if everything about the game is stellar.

>>3810132
Classic cucky cope
That will be 15$ PLUS tip (and tax) goy

>>3810132
> replay value
t. FIFA 2025 enjoyer

>>3810132
Imagine if those games you bought were even cheaper. Then you would be saving more money, and those "poorfags" you disdain could afford it. More players win.

>>3809498 (OP)
Never pay more than $20 for a game.

>>3810728
idk i think gatekeeping is good actually. I don't want icky turdies and shitskins playing since that's all you do when you lower it too much.

>don't care about the latest shiniest release
>avoid day 1 bugs, imbalances and missing content
>meanwhile enjoy other games from a 30 year backlog
>get the games with all the expansions and DLC included, issues fixed
>pay a fraction of the price
>avoid new release related DRM bullshit

Have you taken the wait-to-play pill yet?

>>3811299
i didnt even buy a ps3 til ps4 was coming out and spent the next several years playing through its library at a couple bucks a pop. felt great.

>>3809498 (OP)
It's not about quantity, but quality.

Would you rather pay 60 bucks for a 20h extremely good game, or a 45h slog.

>>3811309
Wow you so smart man

>>3809498 (OP)
15 is the max I give for digital games

>>3811299
Anon nooo other people might finish the game before you!

>>3811723
Great, then they can tell me if it sucked so I won't need to bother with it

>>3811711
10$ for me ONLY because easy access to multiplayer

>>3811299
>Quit gaming for 10 years
> Get back to it
>All classics like Mass Effect, Witcher, Dragon Age etc is completly new to me
>Its all dirty cheap sometimes 3 games + DLCs remastered
>Have fun and be a loser gamer
I enjoy. New gaames are awful gay shit anyway these days