>>3838419
>RPG means role playing game so logically that has to be the most fundamental and core defining trait. First and foremost we should all agree on that.
Except that those of us not born after the year 2005* know that videogames RPGs are a genre of videogames that tries to mimic the tabletop RPG, which predate videogame adaptations
and those of use who were born before 1991** know that ttrpgs aren't called RPGs because "playing a role is a fundamental trait of it"
the videogames that coined the term "computer RPGs" [as opposed to regular RPGs played at a table, something we today have to specify as ttrpgs] are rouge, wizardry, ultima, might and magic, bard's tale, etc. And guess what, this is what original TTRPGs were like too, B/X D&D, AD&D1e, Traveler. You have a base/town [maybe some wilderness] and a dungeon. And the dungeon is the campaign. And "role playing" didn't mean what you think it means.
And guess what "player skill" is absolutely part of original RPG vision.
Drama "role playing" is a valid part of RPGs today, sure, just as drama is part of modern day videogame RPGs.
But it's not the centerpiece you see in it simply by looking at the term.