>>2130015
You are so fucking dishonest.
The devs clearly care about visual cohesion and take great effort into aesthetics and visuals of the people and portraits.
In Anno 1800 the setting is vaguely the Atlantic. We have Spanish officer types. Fat greedy Englishmen, Meso American and Latin Americans, free American Blacks and African Blacks. All that actually looked and sounded like that person would have been like in real life. The one that was most jarring was the scholar, who also happened to have the blackest most guerilla facial features but dressed and was in a position that would have never happened. He was clearly the inserted token. Literal cultural appropriation shit.
In Anno 117 they also give great attention to people's aesthetics and visual cohesion. The default character is Italyman. The soldier rival is short and stocky, the other rival is basically an era accurate statue that was animated. The people in Albion look the part. And then there is the negro in OP, who surprise surprise shares the same features like the scholar - aggressively niggerish, looks like he is in cosplay and in a position which would be impossible for him to be in. In fact, he is even worse than the scholar because blacks were and would be present in the time and geography of Anno 1800 whiles it would be near impossible in Rome.
Why is that all the other people in Anno 117 perfectly fit into what people would have looked like and then there is this one fucking glaring character that blazes "this game was never historically accurate and never tried to be, it's just a cozy city builder and was always made by left leaning devs" & "so it makes sense they want to make their fantasy world have all races".
Its not just about having a black token character, its about casting the negrofication spell on a white person.
