Thread 2133966

>Fire Emblem
Good gameplay, shit ass story
>Advance Wars
Good gameplay and okay story

The only reason why Fire Emblem is still alive is because of the units with monster titties, or am I missing something?

>>2133966 (OP)
It's because of Japan. AW never sold well in their home market.

>>2133970
Famicom wars exist since the Famicom, though. It's kinda strange that the best games of the series sold poorly, but what do I know, Japanese have shit taste.

>>2133966 (OP)
AW only has an “okay story” because it’s barely trying to have one. FE actually puts an effort into it’s cast and narrative, and sometimes it doesn’t work.

>>2133984
>Effort into narrative
Awakening has Wattpad tier shit

>>2133991
>and sometimes it doesn’t work

>>2133994
More like most of the time.

>>2133998
To each their own.

>>2134002
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaP8IACTjRU

BOOBA

>>2134007
If you’re making a point then I’m not seeing it.

>>2134009
I still believe it all boils down to the sex appeal aspect.

>Advance Wars
Has Sami, Nell, Lash, Sasha, Jess maybe Sonja if you're a pedo, but the number of women you can simp over is not as great

>Fire Emblem
Has a bunch of female characters with massive titties and unlike in Advance Wars, they can wear whorish outfits, because they are in a made-up world, so the army's prudishness doesn't apply like it does in AW

>>2134015
Ah.
I mean, I’m sure there’s plenty of people that only care about the sexy girls, but that’s true of every series with sexy girls in it and has nothing to do with how good or bad it’s story is.

>>2134015
Also Sami is used goods (shipped with Eagle by the game itself)

>>2133966 (OP)
>Fire Emblem
i like when knights hit each other with swords
>Advance Wars
i dont care about tanks killing tanks most of the time
it is by my will alone that advance wars shall languish in the pits of obscurity for one million years while fire emblem shall receive eternal acclaim

>>2134030
For one whole game, that then gets forgotten about in 2 and DS apart from one bit of dialogue each.

>>2134036
>pleb who values titties over strategy
Unsurprising. But given that there's probably may others like you, it explains why AW never went too far.

>>2134071
That’s not even close to what he said.

I'm working on a Advance Wars clone. Ask me anything.

>>2134087
Are you woke with a tumblr artstyle?

>>2134087
How do you plan to succeed where so many have failed?

>>2134087
Tiny Wars and Advance Wars by Web exist. What makes yours different?

I started playing AW earlier this week and been enjoying it so far. Never played a Fire Emblem game but I've been meaning to get into the series for the longest time because of the waifus.
I do like how the units in AW have roles pretty similar to what they do in real life, I didn't expect a cute-looking turn-based tactics game to be that militarily accurate. It does feel like there was a sudden difficulty spike after the tutorial and the first few levels though it's nice having a tactics game that actually makes me use my brain instead of just hoping for good RNG or grinding for stronger units. But for some levels it seems like there's just an "intended" strategy that you're supposed to use to trivialize it instead of giving the player flexibility.

>>2134087
Canny?

>>2134094
Of course not.
>>2134096
Advance wars was what it was because it was made for the GBA. Advance Wars: Dual Strike failed to grow the audience because it was still the same game from 2001 mechanically and every clone afterward did the same mistakes as Dual Strike. You need to enlarge the scope of the game otherwise it's still a 2001 game in 2025.
>>2134111
I don't know the specifics of Tiny Wars but AWBW target the compfag community pretty hard. We plan to have an online multiplayer, but the competitive aspect is not the priority since we can't predict if we will even have an large online community (every AW clone until now has failed to get one outside of its launch window).
While our current objective is to copy the advance wars mechanics, we plan to diverge from them once we have a vertical slice, this is something AWBW and maybe Tiny Wars don't have the luxury of doing since their target audience want a 1:1 clone of the original games and nothing else.
>>2134161
Who ?

>>2134071
just for that i'm giving advance wars another million years in the pit

>>2134517
>You need to enlarge the scope of the game
nah

>>2134131
You playing Reboot? There's plenty of content to test you. The challenge levels that you can play (non-campaign) get really interesting.

>>2133966 (OP)
does advanced wars evem have a solo mission modus?
I thought it was just endless battles against npcs with nothing more to it

>>2134766
what the hell are you talking about

I mean it doesn't hurt.

>>2133966 (OP)
I think part of it also has to do with the fact that fantasy/medieval settings are also much more popular than modern war settings with the Nintendo audience, especially in Japan.

>>2134766
It has a singleplayer campaign, multiplayer with a GBA cable link, challenge maps, and a custom map creation mode.

>>2133966 (OP)
>>2134007
>>2134071
Sorry about your amputated penis, bro.

>>2136400
Hey, circumcision is no laughing matter

>>2134087

engine? and 3d models or pixelart?

>>2136400
Kek, I like tiddies. I just don't like Fire Emblem's 'story'. I wish they made a game like Advance Wars in gameplay, but with FE tiddies. That'd be so fucking awesome.

>>2136460
We created a custom 2D engine using XNA.

>>2134517
> You need to enlarge the scope of the game
good luck with bloat clone bro

>>2134087
Have you heard of wargoroove? What do you think about it?

>>2133966 (OP)
>The only reason why Fire Emblem is still alive is because of the units with monster titties
In short, yes.

No Fire Emblem map is as tedious as this shit.

>>2138619
Bro what is this famicon wars shit
We're talking about advance wars

I NEEED MOAAR WARS TYPE GAMES! REC ME MOAAAR

>>2138574
It's one of the better AW clones, I especially liked the Double Trouble campaign with a friend. But it's still the same 2001 game with a few new mechanics. Whoever was responsible for the plot and the character design should be thrown in a fire though. The failure of the sequel show that the genre need to evolve while still being faithful to the core gameplay, it should open new strategies to the players. AWBW proves that AW is already minmaxed with its current ruleset.

don't mind me, just being the best AW game in both mechanics and story

>>2138943
>the failure of the seuquel
Did it fail gameplay-wise, or in it's sales only?
>the genre need to evolve while still being faithful to the core gameplay
But that's the issue, isn't it? Seems to me, this gamestyle is sort of 'complete'. Even wargoove 2 with it's added mechanics seemed bloated to me in comparision. Anyway, how's the project called? I'll keep an eye on you.

>>2138945
It's hit and miss. Some of the mechanics are good, like fog, others are more questionable, like COs.
Story's definitely the best, though. Not even because it's the only one that tries, it's actually good.