>>102244036
If this lady debuted as a vtuber, her model, if based on her IRL self, would 100% be a cunny.
Leftist sisters... are we the baddies for trying to cancel some of them?
>>102244036
It's crazy to think that she had another version ready to go. She would've had to coordinate with whoever did the animation to have that, someone else was in on it
>>102244325
She got her videos demonetized by YouTube and probably a stern warning, if they didn't have it already prepared it was surely made ASAP so she doesn't get fully banned. It's not a lot of effort required
Because she's in the "i've totally changed guys" portion of the grift, gotta trick all of the fat lolicons into giving her money before she slips back into the "stream once every 3 months" portion.
>>102244446
I haven't seen any proof that anything has been demonetized. If people can still get memberships and superchats, that's like 90% of her income anyway
>>102245278
It also says ads aren't on, so she wouldn't be getting ad revenue anyway. Channel members and superchats are 90% of a vtuber's money. She's clearly done milking the pedos so she can go to more normal friendly appearances
