>>104217308
A woman choosing to take sexy picture does not require that "women exist for the pleasure of men" be treated as a universal condition. If you think it does, that's your opinion, but don't assume everyone agrees.
There are people who record themselves performing music. That doesn't mean that all musicians exist for the pleasure of men. Or the pleasure of women. Or the pleasure of people who don't know how to sing or play an instrument.
Neither situation requires a leap from the individual to the universal.
I do have a sister, and she is an individual, not some avatar with a cosmic connection to all things female across time and space.
That would be weird.