>>104268561 (OP)
That cosplayer is right though. You need to have a sexual attraction towards the loli to be a lolicon. It's the "complex" part of loli complex. You can like their aesthetic and cuteness but unless you get aroused by them you are not categorically a lolicon.
>>104270979
saba literally panders to lolicons and is a lolicon herself
why would you associate with her in the first place if you hate what she stands for and the people she enables
>>104271057
It's the troon playbook, claim ownership of the #1 thing so they can flaunt that over everyone else. In order to warp vtubing into their freak paradise they need to own Gura/Saba just like what they tried with games and are still trying with anime.
>>104271057 >saba literally panders to lolicons
Part of the job. One rung away from business yuri in terms of legitimacy >why would you associate with her in the first place if you hate what she stands for and the people she enables
I like her, and the definition of the term is on my side.
>>104271314 >Part of the job. One rung away from business yuri in terms of legitimacy
if that was the case she could've disown it after she rebranded, multiple vtubers have done this including nyanners
you are supporting a lolicon and youre coping
>>104270979
I will preface this by saying most cases of any kind of -con is sexual in nature, but this is still wrong. See like siblings who dote on each other being described siscons and brocons without sexual meaning behind it (usually).
>>104272116
And his point is that she could have left that part of Gura behind if she wanted to. It didn't need to be part of her "current" brand, Saba could have been a non-loli and stopped talking about loli-adjacent stuff. But she chose to make Saba a loli and continue to make lolicon jokes. And the only thing you can do is cope.
>>104272571
Your argument doesn't even make any sense unless you think that Saba's use of a loli model necessarily means that she's sexually attracted to lolis herself as opposed to maybe enjoying their cuteness and using their aesthetic for her business.
>>104268561 (OP)
That twitter account is just a weird cosplayer stalker
why are you batting for him making a facetious thread about this interaction twice now