>>5907457People into this shit are such dregs that saying they own anyone doesn't say anything. You can see how the current approach in combatting these things has worked out: some dysgene gets arrested, we mock them, but then their former friends mock them too for getting arrested, meanwhile we act like the whole thing isn't equally as pathetic. They just turn their own former leaders into lolcow-martyrs, and go on as usual.
You need to attack them with more vitriol and severity, yet also levity and "inherent superiority". You need to find what they don't like. You can't say stuff like they're evil deranged zoomer scum even if it's true, because to them, being evil and deranged is good. See where I'm going with this? Calling every single comnigger "764" just raises da rep mane, you're more or less complimenting them for being tuff af gangsta ahh edgelord.
No, no... You have to attack them persistently and offensively. Niggers faggots worms. They pretend they're all some sort of online King Von, amoral atheist satanic whatever label they want. Start inventing slurs for them. Come on, people here skew millennial and I know how creative you people were when it comes to that. Come on: comniggers, comfaggots, comestizos, comexicans, comuntermensch... Help me out here! Add your own.
Perhaps the most stinging remark in their eyes is that of "moralfag". Perhaps "normie" or any derivative of that, too, but we can always experiment with that. Mock them, because as long as your attacks are visibly motivated by moral outrage, you're just feeding the troll. We can clearly see that arrests aren't especially effective - another cohort of degens simply swoops in because the concept itself is "powerful". We're dealing with people operating on the logic of juju and totems. Calling them 764, in their minds, gives them mana, or something, because it got dat power dawg.
1/2