Thread 5922705

Post your fav songs from 1990 to 1999

>>5922705 (OP)
I beat all of wipeout on the playstation to this song.
>>5922855
fuck Fagazi.
>>5923224
damn, that takes me back.

>>5922708
Thanks for this

all this trash needs to stay in 90s

>>5923784
Irony

>>5925070
Very nice

>>5925183
I remade this from flac instead of the converted youtube video.
can't delete old one so whatever.

>>5925714
>>5925723
I approve

>>5925623

Awesome. I remember when this CD came out.

>>5926304
here you go you lazy shit :)

>>5926603
just dont want to save up ton of pointless song webms.

>>5922705 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niZuUzUzN-U

>>5926813
>2002

>>5922705 (OP)
Whenever I hear this song, I immediately picture a beheaded Drew Barrymore with a hole drilled in the back of it and I’m fucking it and right as I’m about to cum I pull out and I force Lucy Lou down on her knees at gun point and I blasted it all in her eyes and as I’m doing that I lose control of the gun and I shoot her right in the forehead as Cameron Diaz is watching and fingering herself to all that is happening.

>>5922869
Thread immediately ruined with nog music. Kill yourself.

>>5922705 (OP)
>not picking Smack My Bitch Up
tsk tsk

>>5927047
Fuckin time machine, man.
Took me back to high school.

>>5923784
how hard did these fags sell out?
now they support everything they sang about opposing

>>5927589
some rock mag tell you that bud?

>>5927662
keep licking those boots

>>5927663
yeah bby

>>5927589
>now they support everything they sang about opposing
their anti-war sentiment never went anywhere fuckface

>>5926824
>Thread immediately ruined with nog music. Kill yourself.
Call me a nigger cuck faggot so I can cum PLEASE.

>>5928479
I prefer this version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLuvFDRS2Lg

>>5922705 (OP)
Hey! That's the Wipeout 2097 main theme!

>>5928625
Finally a fellow punk listener, and great Swedish punk as well. That gets you added bonus points.

There's hope for this thread yet

>>5928625
Finally a fellow punk / post-hardcore listener, and great Swedish hardcore as well. That gets you added bonus points.

There's hope for this thread yet

>>5922705 (OP)
The memories. I always went out on the dance floor, like many others, and bounced my heart out whenever this played in a club.

>>5922884
based

>>5928482
>56.0 kb/s, 11khz ceiling
I know it was shit to begin with but god damn

>>5928807
haha its punk because it says so on the cover

>>5922872
This movie is great. It was good back then and has aged extremely well. Beautiful cinematography and actors.

>>5929142
It works for me

RIP Ozzy
you will be missed

>>5930231
yes, no more tears was cut at the end to be postable.

>>5922884
>>5929124
Giant Robot I (Buckethead, Brain, Pete Scaturro ) - Mrs Beasley (Live Paradise Lounge, San Francisco, CA 1996-02-29)

>>5922876
I still know this entire song by memory all these years later

>>5927570
part of the beauty of music

>>5926710
oh shit I have this LP

>>5929133
oh shit I also had this LP

>>5928479
Very weird how a literal cuck would glorify violent street thugs. You have a very unwell mind.

>>5927984
they're pro war, communists want war. a revolution is a war. they are democrat and democrats openly shelter communists in their ranks.
>>5927665
>>5927662
>some rock mag tell you that bud?
clueless or disingenuous.
>got bought out by a big record label under a corporation
>is unquestionably on the side of everything corporations stand for (because they are paid by a corporation)
>got shoved into the democrat party longhouse
>spend their money frivolously and on luxury, rarely on philanthropy and usually the philanthropic pursuits are for public image only
>donates huge sums of money to the DNC to represent communist policy for them

>>5933559
>clueless or disingenuous.
yes, you are.

>>5933559
It's time to take your medication again. You're just repeating buzzwords you do not understand.

>>5933690
>>5933716
I mean, if you're going to say RATM only makes music to send a message about rebellion and not participate and meddle in the system they live under, then Mr. Beast is an obviously generous man with no ill intent or desire to be rich.
Or you have no principles.

>>5933690
>>5933716
Wait do you two genuinely not know the artist behind the music?

Yeah you retards don't even know the guys you're listening to are outspoken communists.
I said they suck at being communists because their entire history as a band is sucking up to capitalism and the system.

BTW
>>5933559
>>5933852
>>5933856
these posts are me
>>5927589
this is someone else

This isnt a 1 person opinion

>>5931841
Great album. Loved transatlantic foe.

>>5933861
blah blah blah nobody cares
>>5933856
I know way more than you can ever hope to retain.
go make a post on reddit and write your assmad diatribe there, I'll be sure to not go there

COCAINUM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LatwrEk8ZKk

>>5922708
What the fuck I always thought this was No Doubt

>t. 1993

>>5936291
lmao
I had a few songs like that in my head.
for instance, I always thought this song
>>5928222
was Alice in chains, but then again I never really liked AIC enough to know for sure.

>>5937405
>was Alice in chains, but then again I never really liked AIC enough to know for sure.
Staley was in AIC. There is also a connection to Pearl Jam, The Screaming Trees and The Walkabouts. This was the only MS LP and it's pretty good with a lot of different styles going on.

>>5937547
>wow those drums sounding extra shite
>I wonder why
>64.5 kb/s
>ceiling of 9Khz

>>5937555
If you got a better version of this 6min song that'll fall under 6 mbs by all means post it. Other wise have yourself a lovely evening.

>>5937547
>>5937555
here :)
made form
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtcDW6Z_EqA

>>5937561
just did m8
what I said wasn't a jab at you, it just wasn't great

>>5937569
What downloader/converter are you using? It's better than anything I'm using.

>>5937579
gonna just copy and paste my old post cuz I'm lazy

>>5895903
primarily just ffmpg+command line and source material
if I dont have it in my collection I use yt-dlp to pull audio source,
discogs.com or albumartexchange.com for images

I also use this script for youtube sometimes
but sometimes it does not like filenames with weird characters
https://pastebin.com/T8VLWw6H

or even very rarely yt-dlp with a gui

you may need to copy and paste the pastebin link, pastebin doesn't like hotlinking sometimes

>>5937620
and that script is what I used to make >>5937569
it was written by another anon, and edited by me.
its pretty straight forward

>>5937620
>>5937630
Thanks a bunch for all the info. I'll def give it a shot.

>>5937569
>>5937620
What audio bitrate is this? I was investigating encoding this myself and the audio copied from youtube at 128k is a hair under 6MB, but this is slightly smaller but not as small as my pass at 112k which came out to about 5.5MB.

>>5934718
What fx is this at the beginning?

>>5937663
I put in 128K but the end result was a hair over 6MB, so I obviously couldn't post it.
I redid it with 125K and it was small enough

>>5937670
Naruhodo. That's a bit of a strange bitrate so it threw me for a loop. I can't for the life of me get the webm below 6147KB at 128k even with my magic tricks so yours is the highest possible bitrate that can fit on /wsg/, I kneel.

>>5937687
you can edit the script to use 3 frames instead of 4
-vframes 3
setting it to 1 makes some players not want to play it, and also technically its "not animated" as its 1 frame so against /wsg/ and /gif/ rules

or even bump up -crf 10 to -crf 20 or more, but it will just lower image quality

or did you mean yourself manually not using the script?

>>5934250
yea rage WITH the machine dude
dont forget your 5th booster!!

>>5937723
>no u
>b-but the vax tho
pathetic

>>5937728
you're the one seething lol

>>5937716
I have my own script but I'm looking at what your script does, it's quite similar. I mess with the keyframe interval (-g) which reduces the output filesize by making fewer keyframes.
https://www.ioriver.io/terms/keyframe-interval

>>5930715
the Nightcore version is so popular, sounds weird at proper speed

>>5928625
only popular cause of friday night lights

>>5937901
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html

>>5937957
I remember it from Crank

Trying out some new methods here.

>>5938346
imho too many of the same frame, all that extra size can be used for audio quality instead

>>5938416
I forgot to say its your original audio track, just with a different cover,

>>5925952
based. I'm glad those guys came back for a reunion tour.

>>5938416
Really it's keyframes that bloat filesize. By reducing the framerate, you're reducing the number of keyframes indirectly, and really if you make it one keyframe the size is about the same at 24fps. Though all things being equal, encoding speed is way faster at 1fps.

>>5938416
op here. Reducing frame rate did reduced the file size, but it also reduced the overall bit rate. My only objective was to get an existing 6.85mb @ 144kbps file under 6mb's without losing any noticeable audio quality (I could detect none with these old ears of mine)

using Convertophile/ffmpeg (I like things simple)
24 fps - 5.51mb - overall br 123 kb/s (posted)
1 fps - 4.49mb - overall br 100 kb/s less than 10 secs to process, super fast

The main thing is I've learned a lot from your insight. You've helped a great deal.

>>5938982
I don't know what you mean, because audio bitrate and video bitrate are separate. You can render a song at 128kpbs while using a video bitrate of like 1kbps at 1 fps.
For music webms that are a static image, you want to have control over the audio bitrate first and foremost.

>>5938683
i'm doing both. 4 video frames total. 1 key frame every 30 seconds.
the extra 8 thousand + frames of the same image being gone, shaved off 1MB +

>>5938982
thats cool
I sure as hell don't know everything either

>>5939054
In my A/B test, the size difference between 24 fps and 1 fps was 0.1MB when using one keyframe (that is, the keyframe interval matches the duration of the video)
Video compression works by taking the delta between keyframes, so individual frames that don't change take up a minuscule amount of space. Since it's a static image, there is no need for more than one keyframe.

>>5939006
Using the program I used you don't have that kind of overall control. Handbrake will give me more control and a tad better results, but 5 fps is as low as you can go. Like I stated I cant tell the diff between the 2 files. I don't mean this as a dig in anyway, but I look at the destination being more important than the ride, if that makes any sense, but I've been drinking so it makes sense to me.

>>5939068
I get it, considering those tools it's not really worth the effort. Truth be told 96k works most of the time. Anon's script >>5937620 is quite efficient though.
I'm coming at it more from a theory angle. I've made a few tweaks to my script based on some of the discussion here.
webm related was made by simply specifying the youtube link and the "--static_image" flag, and it only took a few seconds to encode. It chose 120kbps audio which isn't far off from what can be done manually. Consider checking it out if you're not averse to the command-line:
https://github.com/chameleon-ai/webm-for-4chan?tab=readme-ov-file#music-webms

>>5926824
cry about it, fag

>>5939066
but thats not what is happening here.
>>5938346
otherwise
>>5938416
wouldnt be so much smaller

>>5939066
>the size difference between 24 fps and 1 fps was 0.1MB when using one keyframe

yeah because its only 1 frame either way
there is not 24 frames per second.

re-reading it, idk why you're saying what you're saying, you're repeating yourself
of course the video with 1 frame is gonna be smaller

>>5939378
Keyframes and frames aren't the same thing, you're conflating the two. If you were to pull it into a video editor you would see that all the frames are there.
Also, you can't hear the difference between >>5938346 and >>5938416 because they both have 96kbps audio. Your tool isn't doing what you think it's doing.

Think about it this way. When a video is decompressed for display, it's like a reel of film. Every frame is there according to the fps (variable framerate is a different story but that's not what we're talking about). During compression, those frames are stored by taking snapshots of the "reel" as keyframes (aka I-frames). Each of these takes up a lot of space because they're complete pictures. Frames that come after this are P-frames, which store the difference from an I-frame rather than the full frame information.

Think of a webm where someone is moving and they leave behind a trail of compression artifacts. For display purposes, all the frames are there, you can step through frame-by-frame. But those frames are really reconstructed based on one I-frame. So that means for a static image, all P-frames are just a few bytes of overhead with the delta information being empty. It's not "one frame", all the frames are reconstructed, it's how video compression works on a fundamental level, we're just talking about an extreme example where we only need one I-frame.
https://visionular.ai/what-is-gop-group-of-pictures-video-compression/

>>5939408
when did I say they were the same?
>you're conflating the two
no.

>If you were to pull it into a video editor you would see that all the frames are there.
pull? what? what are you talking about?


>Also, you can't hear the difference between >>5938346 and >>5938416 (You) because they both have 96kbps audio. Your tool isn't doing what you think it's doing.

I know you can't.
again, where did I sat that??
also when did it become about audio?
in fact, I even said it is the same track( >>5938420 ) because I pulled it from >>5938346
and got rid of the extra 8K frames.

my tool is ffmpeg and command line.
I'm starting to thing you're trying to "troll" or whatever

>>5939510
>>5939101
>>5939768
>I'm starting to thing

Why can't you idiots just use canva, powerdirector etc and save your project and then convert it to using handbrake, vidcoder, online converter, video2video, anyvideoconverter

vp8/9 50bitrate/ audio opus 48-96


mp4 various/ audio aac 96/128

all this fuss over a static project. this is a MUSIC THREAD, fuck off and make a tutorial thread

OP here again. I have listened to all three files; mine, and >>5938416 as well as the original at least a couple of dozen times and I can't tell the difference between any of them. Verdict. They all pass the taste test. Still, I find this whole conversation fascinating since I'm learning stuff I never knew before. I just hope I don't find myself getting bogged down in the technicalities and end up chasing an unobtainable perfection all the while forgetting about what this is supposed to be all about. The listening enjoyment.

>>5939871
>Why can't you idiots just use canva, powerdirector etc and save your project and then convert it to using handbrake, vidcoder, online converter, video2video, anyvideoconverter

funny.

>>5939871
yes there was another typo in my post too.

>>5922705 (OP)
>midnight
>finish work
>get on motorbike and plug in earbuds
>speed through empty streets to prodigy
I want to go back. So many cars now, the streets are full of uber drivers and homeless litter the place.

>>5940036
europe?

>>5940072
Straya

>>5940075
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiqFcc_l_Kk

>>5940083
https://youtu.be/zVch_PK7SOY?si=EspkYiYumNPylXJW

>>5940085
fuckin classic
you stay strong bro

>>5940085
damn pendulum

>>5939890
>The listening enjoyment.

you can also just post a youtube link

>>5928503
this track goes so hard

>>5922708
so long that i've listened to this. 90s were quite something.