>>5947518
first clip is about to explain the exact thing he's demonstrating, but he cuts it off of course
the second one isn't the same clip, he doesn't even know what he means when he quotes "studio blue" and "studio green" as if they're going to use a green ball to then overlay water on top of, fucking retard
third clip is exactly what a ball of water would look like when entering the shadow of your mouth with little direct lighting, you can even see the overhead lights being culled correctly in order
fourth clip is a reflection of a crew member inside the station from the window
fifth clip, dunno what he's trying to say here, clearly they cut to the wrong feed
sixth clip is just the top of a 360 degree camera where the fov is missing and it has to interpolate between the top most visible angle of said camera, there's a gap right at the top where there is no video, so it just combines both views, you see it all the time with 360 cameras
seventh clip is the water obeying the absence of gravity, actually, if untouched in a jar it will sit in the shape of the jar, given that there is indeed enough water
eighth clip is the only one I can't explain, other than maybe him instinctively going to grab the object he was about to drop thinking it was going to fall, and giving it a slight push down
9th clip is just an encoding issue, not enough bitrate to maintain the motion vectors from the current scene so the pixels of the current scene are momentarily replaced with the last known motion vector (which would've been the very easy to encode static wall) you can replicate this yourself easily with a low bitrate stream and multiple feeds.
this guy needs to either do research or get a life off tiktok
