>>5949133
>you were wrong about the pandemic being faked
They changed the definition of "pandemic" to depend on the number of cases rather than the number of deaths.
They changed the definition of "case" to refer to anyone who tested positive on a hypersensitive PCR test that couldn't tell the difference between COVID and the flu until 2021 (which is why flu numbers flatlined), and was at best designed to err on the side of caution for the purposes of determining who needs to be quarantined, and was repeatedly given to many people to determine if they were safe or needed quarantine. The old definition was someone who actually got so sick they had to go to the hospital.
And they changed the definition of "Death" to refer to anyone who died within 28 days of testing positive on said test, rather than someone whose death distinctly wouldn't have happened if they hadn't gotten sick.
That's how you fake a pandemic, with real statistics.
And what a happy coincidence, that with all the stress and chaos, and medical malpractice resulting from a new philosophy of "quarantine over treatment", and refusing to use cheap effective over the counter drugs in favor of more expensive prescription drugs, the numbers of excess deaths matches closely with the number of deaths within 28 days of a test that so many people were taking on a regular basis.
None of this malpractice was punished. The TV has just shut up about it, and the virus still identified as SARS-COV-2 isn't as deadly as it once was. To the extent that vitamin D deficiency is no longer making a difference in (bogus) death counts, suggesting the thing isn't deadly at all anymore.
But just forget about that, because if you're with the TV you can spread misinformation as much as you want, while if you're against it, you can't let anyone around you suggest a possible future and have it turn out to be wrong because that discredits everything you say doesn't it?
