Thread 5961822

Post brutal blackpill edits

>>5961822 (OP)
tall women are for tall men, fuc off.
.t 6ft 5in tall
short girls mean short children

>>5961822 (OP)
tall women are disgusting, film at 11.

why

>>5961822 (OP)
Kys faggot. You post one video about a couple of women who don't like short men and because you're a short ugly pathetic loser you wallow in your patheticness and think all women are like this. You're pathetic and suffer because of ur brainwashed coomer brain. consider yourself lucky that I replied loser.

>>5962098
Did you write all this this ironically?

I'm tall (192 cm) yet I'm a 32 yo virgin.

>>5961865
Unironically what is wrong with short people?, why do we need our population to be tall?, so that we can just consume more resources and be more at risk of complications associated with tall height such as increased risk of heart disease?

>>5961822 (OP)
post 3 retard, God damn. Newfags and paid shills are so stupid.

>>5962276
Tall men have more leverage in a one on one fight, and in most parts of the world carrying weapons that would equalize shorter men is illegal (because most women are afraid of weapons, because they fear fighting, because they know they'll never win against men).
That's it.
That create the preference.
What leads to this arrogance is the same thing that leads to all other arrogance these days: this culture we have where we think that if you're not important and celebrated, you're being oppressed, so you have to act important and celebrated and excommunicate anyone who calls you out, especially if they're the wrong demographic because according to rankings of original sin, only some demographics are allowed to call others out.

>>5961822 (OP)
With each generation people keep getting taller so in 100 years the whores will be saying "anything less than 7foot is small dick energy no thanks"
When I was 18ish the average height I think was about 5'6" and I am 5'10" which was tall but now isn't.
The sad part is really short girls that would be perfect for the little kings want the tallest guys it's so common to see a 4'8" woman with a 6' dude.. It must be like chalking a pool que

The woke degenerate fags are rising, at least online. They must be stopped, bring back mental asylums

>>5962410
Short people will continue to exist because short women continue to breed

>>5962098
manlet rage

>>5962103
height is a necessary but not sufficient condition for breeding

>>5962276
Cope shortie. I was about to stick up for you short kings but you had to have chihuahua syndrome and sperg out on fake health facts

>>5962412
Wtf I like vaush now?

Uh, cute.
But dating is over anyway.
For a myriadinous multitude of reasons.

Deck chairs on the titanic with this shit.

>>5962414
When chinks take over they'll exterminate short goblinas

>>5962602
Short men don't need your sympathy tallfag, go enjoy your harem of whores and fuck off away from us

>>5961822 (OP)
You could always transition

>>5962415

is it possible this is the result of some feminist social engineering op to make men feel what women think they felt about being judged and shit?

>>5963431
its just the reality man. i think the sexual revolution was a eugenic masterpiece. if you give women sufficient resources and let them pick mates freely only the strongest/best men get picked to procreate. the future belongs to literal 7'2" demi-gods.

>>5963435

I get that, but I mean specifically this modern age of young men obsessing over their height. It wasn't like this even 5 years ago.

Do you think that suddenly manlets just...oh, nevermind, I just realised it's when dating apps blew up and hoes were filtering guys out by height.

>>5963443
yeah basically. but overall men been getting taller as well so women's expectations just naturally follow that. americans usually look at their avg height 5'7" and think they're fine but that number include subhumans and ethnics. for whites it's much closer to europeans numbers meaning 6' is actually a reasonable expectation from a woman as it's pretty much average for a white man.
But also beauty standards for men have gotten way stricter if anything, face is almost everything, height is mostly a constraint.

>>5963497
>face is almost everything
Height is, women would choose a tall ogre over a handsome short man

>>5963499
this literally depends on how tall/short and how handsome/ugly. also, the advantage of height from a certain point diminishes significantly like if youre above 6'6" i don't think its really doing as much as getting the same percentile in terms of looks. if a dude's 6' and chad vs 6'6" LTN, the 6' chad bags the girl 95% of the time id say. if it's 5'6" chad vs 6' LTN then the LTN bags OR neither bags lol depending on how good looking the girl is

are you guys all incels? im not being rude just wondering? has anyone here been in a loving relationship?

>>5963503
i have yeah. both were teenage love. both girls were LTNs that worshipped me (l-mHTN). i prefer dating girls that look worse than me so that im the one with leverage in the relationship. i think it's very important for relationship dynamics that you're always the girl's first choice.
overall, i dont think the blackpill has any moral bearing it's just a systematic way of thinking about dating and relationships overall

>>5962364
I was telling my grandma that women on dating sites are utterly obsessed with height and insist on men who are 6+ inches taller than they are and she was surprised. She said that when she was young, it was common for women to be with men their own height, which means that when the women wore heels they'd look taller, and no one really cared.
Now I'm sure women have always preferred tall men but making 6 feet a hard requirement is a pretty recent phenomenon.

>>5962364
>Tall men have more leverage in a one on one fight
only if they're muscular
lanklet are terrible fighters and I've personally witnessed plenty of stacked manlet rekt a tall guy
you guys need to touch grass more and stop believing the BS you see here or on reddit

>>5962412
Lmao has that fat fuck always been based?

>>5963519
True, but how many women consider this fact?

>>5962276
up to a point, height is a selector for health
but people in the 1st world arent experiencing malnourishment so where otherwise it may be a useful indicator of overall wellbeing, the only purpose height now serves is to select for itself
and select it does, ill see you when we all get to where were going buddy

>>5963580
Thank fuck women think it goes 5'10 and then 6'

>>5963499
tall ogre here.
no they don't.

>>5963509
Women have always had a sexual selection for height (which is part of why humans are "disproportionately" tall even for upright apes) but what's often not considered is there can be a genetic component to the PREFERENCE for height that can undergo the whole Fisherian runway process (I do think it's mostly "social" though).

Being tall itself though doesn't necessarily signal "fitness" in that "peacock" feather way, like a 6'0 man doesn't really "show off" , or signal genuine advantages, anymore than a than a 5'11 man that's wide shouldered and large framed and I say that as someone that's 6'1 (though I literally shrunk a whole inch possibly from a back injury) and have a genuine 22" biacromial. A manlet twink with a "sharp" model fave would still clean up a lot more. The selection for "bigness" (not exactly equal to selection for tallness) is also partially genetic and cultural (with supposedly "rough" women selecting for it) but what I've noticed is that it's really just another form of "beta provider" to women

>>5963509
>>5963785
Well, there are SOME things that are different now that would make women behave different compared to how they used to, and also cause them to feel like most men are unattractive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffvRhsViyIQ
I really had no idea the problem was this bad. Books I read are read off someone's recommendation. So if all these books mention the height of the men at being over six feet...

Height is irrelevant guys. I'm 195Cm and no girl has ever wanted me nor showed interest in me

>>5963929
Just download tinder

>>5962613
this movie is very kino btw even though it's about baseball, it's called moneyball

>>5964207
You are RETARDED for suggesting that.
People throw that word around pretty fast and loose, but you've earned it for real.

Some whores on tittok are not representative of all women, in reality face is more important

>>5964370
Different head, same hydra.
Those are whores too.

>>5963499
You're crazy if you actually believe most women would chose a 6'2" guy with an ugly face over a 5'10 guy with a handsome/Chad face.

>>5963753
I wonder if the height pressure is somewhat different in the US compared to continental Europe because of the different systems. 6 feet is such a neat, harsh line for women to focus on. With centimeters it's a bit more fluid I figure, maybe the cut-off would be 1,80 meters here but you don't ever hear women going on about a numberike that here. They obviously still prefer taller men but the number itself doesn't have such a magical status.

>>5962412
This is when the the commies make the useful idiots face the wall

>>5964370
face only registers after a height is fullfilled or in enviroments where height can be frauded (i.e. movies, social media)

>>5964547
yeah exactly, 5'10" chad wins every time
>>5964559
yeah there isn't such a number desu. although a lot of people in Europe have started to think in feet as well due to american online content but it's not so bad yet.
I don't think there's a hard cutoff. ive never had a girl ask me about my height (6'1"), overall people don't really talk about height a ton here bc most people are tall since theyre white. race-mixing and all non-white immigrants have skewed the US average height a lot. i think the cutoff for when you're short in europe is like 178cm

>>5963435
> sexual revolution was a eugenic masterpiece
I forget but there was this woman-redpill pic collage going around where, if the stats are correct, women overwhelmingly select for violent retards, as in, violent retards have a lot more kids with a lot more women, and high iq, high earners who obey the law have comparatively fewer kids and partners
I dont think it had data on lookism so I assume that looks were evenly distributed(unless you want to argue that looks and iq and character are correlated, which I doubt that they are)
> 7'2" demi-gods
the future belongs to 7'2 violent retards

>>5961822 (OP)
In case anyone needs to hear this: it doesn't matter, you shouldn't be interested in vapid basic bitches anyway (unless you're on their level, I guess). Sure, most women probably prefer taller men but there are much more important factors.

>>5964956
>there was this woman-redpill pic collage going around where, if the stats are correct, women overwhelmingly select for violent retards,
yea, you mean the one where it says having an iq over 85 doesnt provide any additional benefit in dating? doesn't really mean women will select for retards tho. they select for looks which are highly correlated with intelligence. meaning yeah being smarter won't give you and edge but being better looking will which makes it far more likely that you'll be smart will.
i.e. selecting for looks is selecting for intelligence indirectly

>>5962098
Kek
>youre just hyperfixating, not all women hate short men you short little bitch!

>>5962103
im 190cm and also 32. i lost my virginty last year. i belive in you bro

>>5962412
>>5962603
>>5963588
Heteroids started all wars.
Heteroids did all the genocides.
Heteroids rob you blind.
Heteroid men hate their fellow man.
Heteroids invent weapons that cause misery and destruction of innocent humans and the planet itself.
Heteroids pollute the planet.
Heteroids nuked two cities in Japan.

Then heteroids call others degenerate.
Eat a bullet, homophobe. The rest of us will be better off without you.

>>5962098
Ok short king

>>5962322
Paid shills? Are you in the wrong thread or are you an actual retarded person.

>>5963504
What are these gay acronyms you keep using.

>>5961822 (OP)
>>5962415
>>5963580

The problem with these vids is I have to look at a woman and hear her words and that is just unacceptable.

>>5967663
read up fag https://incels.wiki/w/Incel_Glossary
LTN - low-tier normie 4/10
LTB - low-tier becky 4/10 (female equivalent)

>>5967660
Anon, most demoralization threads are payed shill garbage.

>>5967450
What an odd post. You fags wouldn't even exist if normal people weren't having kids for you to molest.
>Heteroid men hate their fellow man.
Gays are some of the most catty, vindictive, hateful people lel.

>>5963399
I used to know this troll piece of shit who used to try and convince retards that if u snap ur boner it will grow back bigger when it heals

>>5967960
What an odd post. Child molestation seems to be on your mind perpetually, i wouldn't let my future kids anywhere near you.
And yes, heteroid men put each other down all the time instead of uplifting each other. And i don't care what some dumb gays act like, the rest of us blend in and that's why you only notice the attention whores.
And even then, gay attention whores are at least honest, look at heteroid attention whores like elmo and drumpf, actively importing infinity jeets and protecting child predator elite.

>>5968025
>Child molestation seems to be on your mind perpetually
Extremely weak strawman. Fags molest at a rate nearly 7x more than normal people, despite being a miniscule subset of the population. I could point to many other sources backing this up.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

What you don't realize is that you're abnormal, and that society could never function if it was primarily gay. You hate "heteroids" despite heterosexuality being what we are biologically designed for. A far, far greater proportion of faggots are "attention whores" and the kind to parade around naked in the street, than normal people are.
>gay attention whores are at least honest
Kek.

>>5967450
if children could be born artificially none of these things would cease to exist
there is no society that suddenly becomes immune to its worst vices simply because it fucks people differently
utopias are a myth, you and your kind arent a moral paragons because you like it up the ass

>>5968033
Heteroids molest children at a 100x higher rate than gays, because there are 100x more of them.
How about you focus on the contribution of gays to the scienxes and art, without which you wouldn't be where you are today?
Like Alan Turing, Oscar Wilde, and countless others remembered or forgotten by a bigoted society!
You will remain a forever seething incel about your imaginary problems while the world leaves you behind.

>>5968458
>rate and volume are the same thing
glad you arent involved in any technical field whatsoever
continue to do society a favor by distancing yourself from the sciences and engineering

>>5961822 (OP)
this is the dynamics
>yeah, tall men are more attractive
>short and low value/no substance men get insecure about that
>sniff, sniff, what's that?
>high value/no substance bitches sniff insecurity
>high value/no substance bitches exploit that insecurity to push down on short men to boost their self worth because they have nothing else
>short and low value/no substance men fall for this shit, let themselves bring down by bitches with no substance and develop a self-humiliation fetish over this
don't be that guy. ignore bitches and build substance. wife material doesn't discriminate based on height. may be more difficult to attract when you're ugly / short or whatever, but they actually will never exclude a truly good guy for superficial reasons at the outset, let alone be as gruel or mean as these hollow tiktok whores. reminder that these disgusting harlots are the only women you will truly miss out on.
>t. tall guy

>>5968458
apart from the fact that you don't know the meaning of the word "rate" as pointed out by the other anon, there are only abot 20x more straights than gays. i don't think alan turings sexuality has anything to do with his contributions to the field. the instances i can think of where sexuality of faggots actually mattered to their contributions to society is like gay fashion or theater or something and the spread of aids, so that's not exactly a win in my book.

>>5968482
Yes because we were only allowed to be ourselves for the last century if that. You will see many more contributions in the future.
>only abot
I wouldn't be attacking others when i can't spell basic words lol

>>5968706
>mention aids epidemic
>"Yes because we were only allowed to be ourselves for the last century if that. You will see many more contributions in the future."
please no, keep your stds to yourselves ok?
>"I wouldn't be attacking others when i can't spell basic words lol"
>can't into basic meaning of words
>thinks typos are a sign of low iq
and your brainsworms too. a general word of advice, faggot: don't put your nose or tongue where they don't belong, you will get seriously get bacteria up there that literally eat your brain.

>>5968714
I'd be more concerned about losing my virginity than getting stds if i was you lmao.
>brainworms
Yeah i was right about low iq. Don't worry bud, you're gonna make it, I'm rooting for you

>>5963435
They don't procreate so it's almost irrelevant.

>>5968150
Remind me the value of being homo as opposed to castration?

>>5963435
What a stupid fucking cope. look up Fisherian runaway selection.

If women are given control over who reproduces, we'll end up with 7'2" 50IQ violent mongoloids with major health issues who have zero hopes of maintaining civilization. Even before that, civilization will collapse because most men are purely motivated by what gets them women, and you can see it today that young men don't want to be scientists or astronauts anymore, they want to be hustler criminals and celebrities because that's what women want. Women will have us back to living in the underbrush naked, spending all day picking lice, socializing, fucking, and fighting within a few hundred years if they are given the opportunity.

Look at history, civilizations that allowed women to decide such things never became relevant enough to take their place in the history books. You will only find small footnotes about them written by patriarchal societies as a curiosity.

>>5961822 (OP)
>blackpill thread
>actually a steathy i want gf thread

>>5962103
Men can't be virgin.

>>5967450
Holy shit. Calm down and for ffs don't go assassinate anyone talking peacefully in Utah or anything

>>5962276
I am tall and I hate the short guy hate. Helps me out but it is bullshit

>>5967450
you're not wrong, but civilisation wouldn't even last 2 days before it fell into utter chaos and even worser suffering if it were run by the likes of your kind

>>5967450
>heteros started all wars
Laughable claim, didnt read the rest

>>5972808
>wouldn't even last 2 days
Cope
>>5972821
>Laughable claim
And yet it's true. Your kind starts wars, even in childhood plays with toy replicas of murder machines instead of barbies like i did. You maniacs are behind why we don't have bases on the Moon and Mars, we spend 800x more on militaries than space exploration and securing our future as a species. Heteroids are useless at best, and an active detriment for our species that need to be culled at worst, depending on how you look at it.

>>5972979
Plenty of fag generals started wars retard stop coping.

>>5972979
all development for space industries existed to further co-developments in military hardware
findings by JPL and NASA were used to produce more efficient missiles, higher altitude planes, and more powerful jet engines
even things as seemingly innocuous as investigations into hydrology were initially funded and advanced by the US military core of engineers and later by the DoD, current cutting edge hydrological studies even now are funded by the US military

you have also failed to respond to earlier posts by other anons, how do you propose the continuation of your utopian gay reich without heterosexuals producing new populations in the only way it can be done

>>5973048
>all development for space industries existed to further co-developments in military hardware
Yes because this is the only way to trick heteroid egomaniacs to give scraps to science.
We only landed on the Moon because of two heteroids dick measuring contest.
This is wrong, disgusting, and all men should become bisexual at least so they start fucking each other instead of killing each other.
>you have also failed to respond to earlier posts by other anons, how do you propose the continuation of your utopian gay reich without heterosexuals producing new populations in the only way it can be done
We already have surrogacy programs on a mass scale you silly short king. Just expand it, make it mainstream and make clear rules so the kids get the best upbringing possible.

>>5961822 (OP)
I find short women really annoying and unattractive. I've tried going on dates with them and it's a literal pain in the neck to have to look down at them when you're walking side by side. My gf now is 3 inches shorter than me and it's perfect. My sons will be taller than me and our daughters will be shorter than her

this shit is so old news get new material

>>5961822 (OP)
I want a short bf to mommy :(

Just goes to show that short men have every right to hate the world. Same expectations, less rewards. Literal oppressed class, incels are. Fuck this society.

>>5973341
russians always take decades to update their shit. its fucking annoying.

>>5962364
You're going extinct. Sub 6ft males will inherit the Earth.

>>5963424
>you could always transition
Anyone who says this is jewish and trans btw.

>>5963424
No, you can't. You can put on a dress and makeup, and then you'll still be a man in a dress. You can cut off body parts all you like but it will not change what you are

>>5963424
Evil Jewish drivel

>>5962412
Socialists in the 1900s when they get sick of retards in their ideology

Bruh like every "heckin based" ideology from the 1900s all split off of socialism or communism.

They all started as socialists then either noticed the stupidity of socialists like mussolini, the jews like hitler, or the stupidity of socialist jews in particular like stalin (he noticed look it up).

>>5963580
As a 5'10 chad, I keep winning.

As a 5 incher chad, I keep winning.

Perfectly average is perfectly acceptable, I keep winning.

All below averages can keep crying, I am a chad among mildly below average chuds.

>>5961822 (OP)
short men have bigger dicks than tall men
t. tall man with short dick, fucking kill me so i can try rerolling into a big dicked DWARFGOD

>>5967450
So enforcing natural selection is bad?

>>5967450
>phobe
incorrect use of that word