Thread 5961822

Post brutal blackpill edits

>>5961822 (OP)
tall women are for tall men, fuc off.
.t 6ft 5in tall
short girls mean short children

>>5961822 (OP)
tall women are disgusting, film at 11.

why

>>5961822 (OP)
Kys faggot. You post one video about a couple of women who don't like short men and because you're a short ugly pathetic loser you wallow in your patheticness and think all women are like this. You're pathetic and suffer because of ur brainwashed coomer brain. consider yourself lucky that I replied loser.

>>5962098
Did you write all this this ironically?

I'm tall (192 cm) yet I'm a 32 yo virgin.

>>5961865
Unironically what is wrong with short people?, why do we need our population to be tall?, so that we can just consume more resources and be more at risk of complications associated with tall height such as increased risk of heart disease?

>>5961822 (OP)
post 3 retard, God damn. Newfags and paid shills are so stupid.

>>5962276
Tall men have more leverage in a one on one fight, and in most parts of the world carrying weapons that would equalize shorter men is illegal (because most women are afraid of weapons, because they fear fighting, because they know they'll never win against men).
That's it.
That create the preference.
What leads to this arrogance is the same thing that leads to all other arrogance these days: this culture we have where we think that if you're not important and celebrated, you're being oppressed, so you have to act important and celebrated and excommunicate anyone who calls you out, especially if they're the wrong demographic because according to rankings of original sin, only some demographics are allowed to call others out.

>>5961822 (OP)
With each generation people keep getting taller so in 100 years the whores will be saying "anything less than 7foot is small dick energy no thanks"
When I was 18ish the average height I think was about 5'6" and I am 5'10" which was tall but now isn't.
The sad part is really short girls that would be perfect for the little kings want the tallest guys it's so common to see a 4'8" woman with a 6' dude.. It must be like chalking a pool que

The woke degenerate fags are rising, at least online. They must be stopped, bring back mental asylums

>>5962410
Short people will continue to exist because short women continue to breed

>>5962098
manlet rage

>>5962103
height is a necessary but not sufficient condition for breeding

>>5962276
Cope shortie. I was about to stick up for you short kings but you had to have chihuahua syndrome and sperg out on fake health facts

>>5962412
Wtf I like vaush now?

Uh, cute.
But dating is over anyway.
For a myriadinous multitude of reasons.

Deck chairs on the titanic with this shit.

>>5962414
When chinks take over they'll exterminate short goblinas

>>5962602
Short men don't need your sympathy tallfag, go enjoy your harem of whores and fuck off away from us

>>5961822 (OP)
You could always transition

>>5962415

is it possible this is the result of some feminist social engineering op to make men feel what women think they felt about being judged and shit?

>>5963431
its just the reality man. i think the sexual revolution was a eugenic masterpiece. if you give women sufficient resources and let them pick mates freely only the strongest/best men get picked to procreate. the future belongs to literal 7'2" demi-gods.

>>5963435

I get that, but I mean specifically this modern age of young men obsessing over their height. It wasn't like this even 5 years ago.

Do you think that suddenly manlets just...oh, nevermind, I just realised it's when dating apps blew up and hoes were filtering guys out by height.

>>5963443
yeah basically. but overall men been getting taller as well so women's expectations just naturally follow that. americans usually look at their avg height 5'7" and think they're fine but that number include subhumans and ethnics. for whites it's much closer to europeans numbers meaning 6' is actually a reasonable expectation from a woman as it's pretty much average for a white man.
But also beauty standards for men have gotten way stricter if anything, face is almost everything, height is mostly a constraint.

>>5963497
>face is almost everything
Height is, women would choose a tall ogre over a handsome short man

>>5963499
this literally depends on how tall/short and how handsome/ugly. also, the advantage of height from a certain point diminishes significantly like if youre above 6'6" i don't think its really doing as much as getting the same percentile in terms of looks. if a dude's 6' and chad vs 6'6" LTN, the 6' chad bags the girl 95% of the time id say. if it's 5'6" chad vs 6' LTN then the LTN bags OR neither bags lol depending on how good looking the girl is

are you guys all incels? im not being rude just wondering? has anyone here been in a loving relationship?

>>5963503
i have yeah. both were teenage love. both girls were LTNs that worshipped me (l-mHTN). i prefer dating girls that look worse than me so that im the one with leverage in the relationship. i think it's very important for relationship dynamics that you're always the girl's first choice.
overall, i dont think the blackpill has any moral bearing it's just a systematic way of thinking about dating and relationships overall

>>5962364
I was telling my grandma that women on dating sites are utterly obsessed with height and insist on men who are 6+ inches taller than they are and she was surprised. She said that when she was young, it was common for women to be with men their own height, which means that when the women wore heels they'd look taller, and no one really cared.
Now I'm sure women have always preferred tall men but making 6 feet a hard requirement is a pretty recent phenomenon.

>>5962364
>Tall men have more leverage in a one on one fight
only if they're muscular
lanklet are terrible fighters and I've personally witnessed plenty of stacked manlet rekt a tall guy
you guys need to touch grass more and stop believing the BS you see here or on reddit

>>5962412
Lmao has that fat fuck always been based?

>>5963519
True, but how many women consider this fact?

>>5962276
up to a point, height is a selector for health
but people in the 1st world arent experiencing malnourishment so where otherwise it may be a useful indicator of overall wellbeing, the only purpose height now serves is to select for itself
and select it does, ill see you when we all get to where were going buddy

>>5963580
Thank fuck women think it goes 5'10 and then 6'

>>5963499
tall ogre here.
no they don't.

>>5963509
Women have always had a sexual selection for height (which is part of why humans are "disproportionately" tall even for upright apes) but what's often not considered is there can be a genetic component to the PREFERENCE for height that can undergo the whole Fisherian runway process (I do think it's mostly "social" though).

Being tall itself though doesn't necessarily signal "fitness" in that "peacock" feather way, like a 6'0 man doesn't really "show off" , or signal genuine advantages, anymore than a than a 5'11 man that's wide shouldered and large framed and I say that as someone that's 6'1 (though I literally shrunk a whole inch possibly from a back injury) and have a genuine 22" biacromial. A manlet twink with a "sharp" model fave would still clean up a lot more. The selection for "bigness" (not exactly equal to selection for tallness) is also partially genetic and cultural (with supposedly "rough" women selecting for it) but what I've noticed is that it's really just another form of "beta provider" to women

>>5963509
>>5963785
Well, there are SOME things that are different now that would make women behave different compared to how they used to, and also cause them to feel like most men are unattractive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffvRhsViyIQ
I really had no idea the problem was this bad. Books I read are read off someone's recommendation. So if all these books mention the height of the men at being over six feet...

Height is irrelevant guys. I'm 195Cm and no girl has ever wanted me nor showed interest in me

>>5963929
Just download tinder

>>5962613
this movie is very kino btw even though it's about baseball, it's called moneyball

>>5964207
You are RETARDED for suggesting that.
People throw that word around pretty fast and loose, but you've earned it for real.

Some whores on tittok are not representative of all women, in reality face is more important

>>5964370
Different head, same hydra.
Those are whores too.

>>5963499
You're crazy if you actually believe most women would chose a 6'2" guy with an ugly face over a 5'10 guy with a handsome/Chad face.

>>5963753
I wonder if the height pressure is somewhat different in the US compared to continental Europe because of the different systems. 6 feet is such a neat, harsh line for women to focus on. With centimeters it's a bit more fluid I figure, maybe the cut-off would be 1,80 meters here but you don't ever hear women going on about a numberike that here. They obviously still prefer taller men but the number itself doesn't have such a magical status.

>>5962412
This is when the the commies make the useful idiots face the wall

>>5964370
face only registers after a height is fullfilled or in enviroments where height can be frauded (i.e. movies, social media)

>>5964547
yeah exactly, 5'10" chad wins every time
>>5964559
yeah there isn't such a number desu. although a lot of people in Europe have started to think in feet as well due to american online content but it's not so bad yet.
I don't think there's a hard cutoff. ive never had a girl ask me about my height (6'1"), overall people don't really talk about height a ton here bc most people are tall since theyre white. race-mixing and all non-white immigrants have skewed the US average height a lot. i think the cutoff for when you're short in europe is like 178cm

>>5963435
> sexual revolution was a eugenic masterpiece
I forget but there was this woman-redpill pic collage going around where, if the stats are correct, women overwhelmingly select for violent retards, as in, violent retards have a lot more kids with a lot more women, and high iq, high earners who obey the law have comparatively fewer kids and partners
I dont think it had data on lookism so I assume that looks were evenly distributed(unless you want to argue that looks and iq and character are correlated, which I doubt that they are)
> 7'2" demi-gods
the future belongs to 7'2 violent retards

>>5961822 (OP)
In case anyone needs to hear this: it doesn't matter, you shouldn't be interested in vapid basic bitches anyway (unless you're on their level, I guess). Sure, most women probably prefer taller men but there are much more important factors.

>>5964956
>there was this woman-redpill pic collage going around where, if the stats are correct, women overwhelmingly select for violent retards,
yea, you mean the one where it says having an iq over 85 doesnt provide any additional benefit in dating? doesn't really mean women will select for retards tho. they select for looks which are highly correlated with intelligence. meaning yeah being smarter won't give you and edge but being better looking will which makes it far more likely that you'll be smart will.
i.e. selecting for looks is selecting for intelligence indirectly

>>5962098
Kek
>youre just hyperfixating, not all women hate short men you short little bitch!

>>5962103
im 190cm and also 32. i lost my virginty last year. i belive in you bro

>>5962412
>>5962603
>>5963588
Heteroids started all wars.
Heteroids did all the genocides.
Heteroids rob you blind.
Heteroid men hate their fellow man.
Heteroids invent weapons that cause misery and destruction of innocent humans and the planet itself.
Heteroids pollute the planet.
Heteroids nuked two cities in Japan.

Then heteroids call others degenerate.
Eat a bullet, homophobe. The rest of us will be better off without you.

>>5962098
Ok short king

>>5962322
Paid shills? Are you in the wrong thread or are you an actual retarded person.

>>5963504
What are these gay acronyms you keep using.