>>5970452 (OP)
does anyone else have the suspicion that the assassination of charlie kirk was just a big slide thread to take attention away yet again the from epstein files? it's just a week ago that the epstein victims were holding a press conference in front of the capitol demanding the release of the files.
why would anyone want to have kirk hot? he's well-known figure, but not very influential, he holds no real power, he's basically just a messenger / communicator. he is replaceable. if you shoot someone who is not a leader, but just a replaceable representation of a position, you just strenghen his position. so what's his position? well, he is probably the most popular supporter of israel on the right who is not himself a jew. his only "flaw" from a jewish perspective is that he has opposed the iran-war, but that's not a general position of his.
so, what does assassinating charlie kirk during a campus debate do? it strengthens the support for israel among the republica, while at the same time making space for someone to fill his spot who is pro-war wrt iran and can potentially sway the maga base in that matter (which was the main reason that bibi couldn't get trump to go all-in on iran) AND while also sliding the epstein topic yet again.
the shot was 100% clean, the assassin has not been caught, the entire thing looks really professional. i am curious to see if we will ever know who did this, but i wouldn't blindly buy into what will be presented as the official story here.