>>6001833
>I posted it because I wanted to see an actual response to it. If you have counter proof that that article is wrong I'd love to see it.
It's absolutely retarded since
1. The jews today use it to talk about Jesus
2. If this yeshu was somebody else there are NO other sources talking about him
3. It'd be a crazy coincidence that this yeshu also has a Mary as a mother who also was in close companionship with carpenters
4. Said otherwise unknown yeshu also had a shameful death, while Jesus's death is the most shameful
5. The argument about Aramaic makes no sense since the common people of Jesus's time spoke Aramaic, including Himself.
>The Gospel of Luke gives Joseph's genealogy as being from David
Completely wrong interpretation unless he had two fathers. Joseph is the son of Heli through marriage, as was custom in the culture back then. This is clear by reading the Gospel of Matthew.