>>6003315
the funniest part about it is that the people making these decisions probably don't even know which product they're putting behind locks
>okay, makeup department time, let's pull the shrink numbers
>wow there's a fucking lot of shrink in makeup, thieving ass skanks
>we should put the whole department behind a counter and put up a whole bunch of cameras and mirrors and shit
>maybe an alarm that screams 'thieving ass skank' loud enough for God to hear
>anyway, let's look at those numbers
>damn that's crazy, this SKU right here, with 1/3rd as many sales of this SKU over here, has three times as much shrink
>what's the description for that SKU?
>MYBNFTM050z 1356NGRBLK
>da fuq
>whatever, lock that shit the fuck up
>thieving ass skanks
>>6002334
just be sure look up the grand larceny amount in your state, and keep track of the price of the things you steal to keep the total value under the limit within a 12 month period, 13 if you're smart
don't forget to toss a pebble in your shoe before you go in
and from me to you, mudfingers, here's a protip: switch up which shoe you toss the pebble into and you can effectively double your limit
i'd tell you to be concerned about facial detection software, but you people look enough alike that AI can't tell you apart from each other (or gorillas) so, to your great fortune, you won't have to concern yourself with it
