If so, is there any psychical or atleast any explanation to how its possible, where is the energy drawn from

Reality is fake and gay. You're just reminding it that it's fake and gay.

Everything in this universe exists and functions by postulate and command. Or at least that's the premise behind Scientology's Training Routine 8, developed in 1957, called "Tone 40 on an Object."

>>40502281
So... its basicly ordering the universe to move the object?

Basically you can't do it while you still have the view that you're a human and reality is valid. If you're able to leave that view on a consciousness level you would be able to do it.
For example if you're a character in harry potter you must abide by the rules of harry potter. If you leave to just outside of harry potter you would be free of the constraints.

>>40501852 (OP)
this is one of the many videos available:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxo6sGfuv-c

>>40502656
>>40502656
Not OP but I've been listening to a lot of Black Magick SS recently; they have this one song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D5utO-6jcQ
It's made me consider something like that; a temporary drug-induced dissociative state that could allow for such "powers" to be used, in contravention with normal brain functioning.

>>40501852 (OP)
No it isn't. But you'll still have schizos posting 1+ hour video ramblings of nothing.

>>40502656
You know what's weird? He mentioned he had a concussion and psychosis can occur during traumatic brain injuries. What he just described all the way to hallucinating telekinesis is psychosis lol. He didn't have any powers his brains just tricked him into think he did. The brain is a powerful organ that pretty much controls our perception of reality. There's nothing spiritual about this.

I've been experimenting. I try focusing on a spot on my body and I can concentrate an energy to the point I feel it on my body, but I haven't been able to move objects, I suspect the easiest would be to levitate something very light weight on top of your hand.

>>40501852 (OP)
In bibliography is ususally perform by hig develop brains. Most of humanity can't point it's own belly button or need to read instructions on shampoo bottles

>>40501852 (OP)
I've never done it myself, but I believe that it is possible and from what I've been able to tell it's somehow electromagnetic in nature and a product of brain activity. The energy is literally drawn from metabolism just like any other use of your body.

Like trying to use a muscle you didn't even know you had, just figuring out how to do it is hard, and once you have, doing anything with it at all is sure to be tiring the first time. I imagine something as simple as rolling a pen across a table with telekinesis might leave you exhausted and with years of practice you might be able to move a few pounds with a lot of effort.

It's real, but it doesn't work how most of you imagine.
There appear to be two kinds of "telekineses" or "Psychokinesis". For the first kind, your evidence is going to be those gigantic boulders in Costa Rica. They were actually weapons. For the second kind, we do not mean physical objects moving, we instead mean person-to-person manipulation, so more like mind control.
To be clear, most of the "powers" all of you obsess over are actually just more potent abilities to influence other people.
The prime driver of all of this is based on Genetics, to be very clear.

>>40501875
good explanation. do you believe it is possible to use my dick to control telekinesis? If my dick is filled with blood, it is filled with iron and therefore is more magnetic and I should be able to easily lift magnetic objects by doing dick push ups

>>40504285
use tin foil or paper. its like and is the material psi-pog forums from 2004 recommended

look up the psi wheel exercise and practice that if you are making psi balls successfully.
https://www.psipog.info/thepsionshandbook01.pdf

>>40505559
Is Psi, Chi?

>>40505711
its all the same thing. qi gong uses it. just train it because its real.
>>40505359
> is sure to be tiring the first time. I imagine
making psi balls will make you hungry

>>40501875
I like this take. Just make reality your bitch.

>>40502422
Yes? Put in a command and watch it work.

>>40502422
The way to do actual "Telekinesis" is by building Visualization skills, tuning everything properly internally (learn to focus, relax the body, etc.) and "balancing" forces externally through visualization and accompanying "energy work".
The missing link here, which you need to develop a system for, is exerting said energy via "energy work", developing said Visualization skills and learning how to focus, relax, etc.

Okay but do it on video and post it here. I bet you won't.

>>40506270
It's a largely genetic capability and if you don't train for it, you can't access it.
Some do in fact have the ability. Basically everyone else can in theory, but not without decades of training most likely.
No, I didn't and will not bother learning how to do it. I'd rather focus on other things.

>>40506293
if you choose to enable a genetic limit that will make it take years to learn the skill, then it will
choose to learn it faster and actually try being able to do it

>>40506301
Are you ESL or not understanding on purpose?
>you can do it if you just learn it faster
There's so much wrong with this.

>>40506310
you took such an offended stance when someoen disagreed with you online. you are not an end-all be-all source and you are an unhelpful teacher because you set limits. you still have a lot of learning.

>>40505488
When I figure this out I will use it to influence my own genetics, creating a positive feedback loop. Infinite power.

>>40503948
get out >>>/sci/

>>40506358
you can already do it
https://www.deeptrancenow.com/psychic-abilities.php

>>40506326
A good teacher guides a pupil toward goals that are achievable and fulfilling. Moving things around by thinking about it in the right ways is hardly a suitable use of someone's time.
The reason the "good guys" don't have any use for this is because there are other, more valuable, more achievable, rewards along this path.
By all means, if you want to pretend Siddhis are for normalfags (and when they're not, achievable without mountainous efforts), don't let me stop you. I'd prefer they didn't all waste loads of time when they could be performing something a bit more worthwhile and with more amenable demands.
Frankly, I don't want to be a teacher and anyone who goes around collecting students is automatically suspicious to me.
>y-you're no authority!
You simply disagree with me. That's perfectly okay, as you've outlined. That doesn't mean I ever postured as if I was a sole, nor immanent authority. You're simply imagining things.
>>40506358
The way you "influence your own genetics" is by procreating.
>>40506530
>View Cart
Oh, that makes sense. You're gatekeeping the conversation so you can sell people shit.

>>40501852 (OP)
TelekinesisGuru on YouTube can show you it isn’t fake. It’s just hard to master.

>>40505728
>its all the same thing. qi gong uses it. just train it because its real.
Thank you.

Somehow suddently I understand qi now. I've always tought that qi was the cold electric chill in the spine. But somehow the Psi teaching in the psionhandbook made it easier to understand.

>>40506427
So like you know this shit isn't true and instead of shutting me up with actual proof you just fuck around and think posting stupid shit like this is going to get me to go away? It doesn't work like that. The OP asked a question and has yet to get a real answer besides some faggots circlejerking each other and posting nonsense videos.

>>40506666
Lmfao. You have to be a fucking moron to think these aren't just illusion tricks and editing. Holy fuck, you're either retarded or the guy trying to plug his own shifty channel.

>>40507227
Why do retards come to the paranormal board just to aggressively deny anything paranormal is possible? Seems like quite a waste of time.

>>40507227
You're an NPC that walked into a den of awakened beings. You don't belong here.

>>40501852 (OP)
This is something I am also curious about. I often perform telekinesis in my dreams (especially in lucid dreams). The sensation is so unique that I can't help but wonder if I can somehow access that feeling during waking life. If reality is a dream of sorts (as some claim it is) perhaps the key is becoming "lucid" within it, in much the same way one lucid dreams.

>>40506293
So basically the phantom menace. It's a skill issue bro, you don't have the milicrodians bro.

>>40507803
Why learn to "make stuff move with your brain" when you can convince someone else to do it for you when you've never physically interacted with them?
There are many ways to skin cats, anon.

>>40507505
Still no proof. Crazy how that works? You gonna cry I'm ruining your stupid fucking larp?
>>40507526
Blah blah blah still no proof.

>>40505559
Do you remember the old youtube videos of the old Asian man who would set things on fire? Do you know if those kind of channels are still up?

>>40501852 (OP)
Pic says it is

ignore the geneshiller
start with initiation into hermetics and become an actual initiate first before worrying about magical powers like telekinesis

>>40505728
>making psi balls will make you hungry
Psi balls are imaginary.

>>40508138
John Chang and yes he's a fucking conman lol. There is no chi and no powers just magic tricks. He got upset because the camera crew coming to see him meant more people would call out his bullshit so he ran away. Came back years later to then perform another magic trick to fool idiots and then claimed "OH my masters don't want me to use my cool powers anymore" and then ran away again. You'd have to b pretty fucking retarded to believe that was true. If so I have an irl friend who trys to sell the same bullshit. I'm sure you'll believe he learned the Kamehameha wave from Tibetan monks but he conveniently can't show you as that would "go against his masters teachings" lol.

>>40510267
>ignore the geneshiller
>a-and instead join my club of faggots who wear funny clothes that don't ever actually learn muh siddhis
You people are fucking miserable.
It's not some muh eugenics idea. No one is screaming WHITE POWER before chugging milk and beating up cute, quirky black girls who just can't seem to find the right guy in between her visits to a "fertility clinic".
Fucking get over yourselves. If you don't quit following me around and running interference, I'll just start linking UAPs to Genetics with NLP and other fun little tricks adjacent to the idea. Then the real fun begins.
Tell your bosses they're wasting their money.

What would even be the practical application of telekinesis? Just train your body if you'd like to lift heavy things.

muggles are funny, they think they'll learn to have abilities

>>40507505
Why do retards go to a forum to lie about things? Seems like a waste of time.

>>40506293
>It's a largely genetic capability and if you don't train for it, you can't access it.
True on the latter, but I find the former questionable. While there may be a genetic component and there's talks about some abilities running in families, I suspect it's in big part because of certain values, outlook, tendencies and rising those families foster.
>Some do in fact have the ability. Basically everyone else can in theory, but not without decades of training most likely.
Not decades, at least not to make some tiny effect. It will still take a bit, but the issue is less in time and more in the methods used and whether the person already has certain faculties developed. You need the latter and the former must fit you well.
In general thought you'll have more success following honestly some spiritual path of self-refinement that may let you develop some abilities as a side-effect than practicing to get a particular ability directly.

Think of it like learning to create wonderful pieces of music. Not all instruments will fit a person as well, not all teachers and methods of learning. You certainly will need some basic predispositions that lack of will be hard to go around without extra effort (ie lack of rhytm or being deaf) but also your general familiarity, an ear for it developed since young age, your preferences will have a meaning. It may be that nearly anyone has enough to learn to play a simple melody, but not everyone will be able to go beyond.

Similarly with not only merely one ability of telekinesis, but progress in various spiritual/occult traditions in general.

>>40511769
>>>/lit/ is that way, Harry Potter LARPer

>>40511999
>Not decades, at least not to make some tiny effect.
This isn't an insignificant comparison when we consider what the normalfags inevitably will imagine. They don't mean jiggling a marker or spinning a little top and I think that's more than just a fair expectation.
>It will still take a bit, but the issue is less in time and more in the methods used and whether the person already has certain faculties developed.
It's about predispositions. You know how certain dogs were trained to alert predators/prey, some were used to herd and others are just supposed to look pretty? A lot of that plays into how this works with humans also.
The general idea here is seeking to perform these sort of comic book feats isn't really worth anyone's time. Sure, someone can probably do it with loads of practice, but training when you're a child is far easier, hence being the most common method.
>In general thought you'll have more success following honestly some spiritual path of self-refinement that may let you develop some abilities as a side-effect than practicing to get a particular ability directly.
In fairness, this is the sort of insight I was looking for. Going searching for le magic powers will certainly lead to someone making some bargain they can't retract or hurting themselves or someone else to accomplish something they'll find out later wasn't all that worth it.
>traditions in general
Traditions have long been developed most intensely inside of genetics-focused systems. I know this is tough to deal with because you can't just alter your genetics (sort of), so everyone feels stuck and supposedly unable to unbind themselves from predetermined qualities of their experience, but I have to adamantly insist that this isn't a perspective conducive to your proper alignment.
Why not consider ways to work around this? Why not use the teachings of said traditions to empower yourself outside of this predicament? That's sort of the whole point, you know.

>>40501852 (OP)
There was a guy here who opened threads about some exercises with a pebble, it seemed pretty in-depth and it included moving the pebble from what i remember.

>>40512244
You visualize balancing forces being applied to the object "remotely". Then you use muh energy work to exert said balances, tweaking them dynamically as needed to balance forces in such a way that any extra force applied guides the object along the stream you carve out for it, just like you do when your body picks up some heavy object and your muscles work in concert to make an object go from position A to position B.
It's the exact same process, but conducted with the Astral body or M-K-V instead of the Vessel.
The fact the guy didn't simply explain that to everyone tells you all you need to know. Be careful of people trying to lull you into secure mind states only to get you to follow the to weird places by clicking on links you probably shouldn't.
Follow some faggot pretending to offer secrets to Discord or Telegram at your own Peril, anon. I'm not sure why you people need to have this constantly repeated to you though.

>>40512276
Managed to find it by searching pebble https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/39965797/#39965797

It's one of those secret society larps, but it doesn't have any discord or telegram links, he just did an AMA.

>>40512291
If he's the guy that only posted a thread or two, I'm misremembering. Otherwise, I seem to recall him leading people after a few threads into "another place to talk since we're having trouble here". This is common rhetoric, in case you haven't noticed yet.

>>40512242
>Traditions have long been developed most intensely inside of genetics-focused systems
I am.. kinda skeptical toward that claim. I guess it may depend though - many eastern practices were utilized either in boundaries of a certain clan or through a master inducing prospective students (through some initiation) into ranks of particular tradition's practitioners but that still was largely self-developed and bestowed trappings, not something genetic.
In most western traditions, various orders, covens and cults were composed by individuals coming from many very different families and their reach spanned across countries and both practices and requirements are again predispositions depending more of a development of an individual and their particular traits, raising etc rather than a bloodline (though I bet there were a few group centered around that as well).

I know some writers like Evola included musings on racial identity etc as of importance in practice but that's neither here nor there - I don't recall any indepth comparison and analysis of genetics and its practical effects on various practices.

If you have any workable info to check on it, as in what races, ethnicities and bloodlines are most fitting/unfit for various particular traditions and why exactly, feel free to share. At the very keast anons sharing your belief will have easier time choosing which particular school they should look into.

>>40512404
>well in modern times
But if you really know much about what was going on traditionally, you know these covens, lodges and various cults are a fairly new phenomenon. There's a reason leadership roles were for so long passed down from father to son, anon.
>I know some writers like Evola included musings on racial identity etc as of importance in practice but that's neither here nor there - I don't recall any indepth comparison and analysis of genetics and its practical effects on various practices.
Jung wrote about it too. It's why everyone called him le raycis. The trouble with this is that it's not some racial absolutism or superiority being discussed. It's sort of like how when you describe what color something is innocuously while on a walk with your friends and someone overhears your conversation, entirely misunderstanding the context of what was being said and, since they overheard your discussion's brief, ambiguous mention of color, they start ranting about how you're racist. Despite trying to convince them that colors of bowling balls and whether or not one fits your hand better has nothing to do with the color and this is a misunderstanding, all they can do is double down because they're in too deep now.
The concept of a "Genetic Egregore" is far more accurate than anyone really wants to admit. The reason has a lot to do with the supposed present balance of powers, who is on what team and what one team has been focused on for so long while the other more or less wasn't.
>tell us about why genetics matters
Obviously I won't be doing that. It's what triggers mods to ban people apparently (trust me, I've been at this for a while), it's what triggers various botnets, and other unwanted guests. If you don't really understand why or why might care, simply scroll up.

>>40512442
>There's a reason leadership roles were for so long passed down from father to son, anon.
Oh no, not at all, at least not in many parts of the world, where priests/practitioners of a given tradition were choosing a student either on the basis of their own fancy/divination or from a group of candidates presented to them.
>Obviously I won't be doing that
See, that alone makes the concept questionable. People claiming such go on "trust me bro". Mods won't ban you for a list of traditions and haplogroups best fitting for them when it;s approached respectably without smearing anyone - nor they would for references to particular pages/chapters of various treatises where, unlike in Evola's case, there'd be particular, workable information on such relations rather than highly theoretical musings.

>>40512728
>no they didn't!
It was absurdly common and it's weird you don't know that.
>they wouldn't just ban you
They're far more petty than you seem to imagine.
They literally banned me and turned on word filters because of what I was talking about, retard.
The funny thing is I understand why. It relates intimately to this thread.

>>40512755
>It was absurdly common and it's weird you don't know that.
Misinterpretation. I underline exactly what I do - that depending on culture and part of the world, depending on root of the tradition there may have been no familial ties between generations of practitioners/adherents. Especially when it comes to many tied to religion. If anything, most commonspread traditions may be commonspread exactly because they weren't kept as a familial practice.
>They literally banned me and turned on word filters because of what I was talking about, retard.
Then you fucked up somewhat fierce in how and when you've talked about it. I bet some jannies may be petty but I never had this problem and I very much discussed such topics with none of the consequences you seem afraid of.

>>40501852 (OP)
Is anyone in this thread able to move a very light object inside a glass like in pic?

>>40513035
Psywheels are fucking stupid, even when encased in glass, they wouldn't be reliable enough and it baffles me it's been the standard for decades. The only accessible thing i would consider reliable would be the bubble in a spirit level. If you can move that you have me onboard.

>>40501852 (OP)
>or atleast any explanation to how its possible,
Do like all relativist physicists and invoke dark energy as explanation.
Explanation to telekinesis:
Done

Is any of this related to bioelectricity and magnets?

i still don't belive it till they can move objects with actual mass

>>40514626
>bioelectricity
Of course.
>magnets
Indirectly, sure. I'm also not a sciencefag, so I can only speak from the muh siddhis perspective.
>>40514649
Right. Normalfags don't think wiggling something funny counts as le do an anime superpower. To be clear, the vast majority of anyone trying to convince you that they can "do Telekinesis" means exactly that. The do not mean some Doctor Strange shit. Some sort of 4D practice related to comic book antics is certainly on the menu, but not flinging printers or tires at people you don't like.

>>40512207
I don't like your tone boy

>>40502422
no

>>40506195
>Visualization
fuck no

Definitely possible.

You can't break reality to move things with your mind.
You can use the power of WILL to move it, but that usually involves the use of your hands, or some other physical force.

>>40517131
>You can use the power of WILL to move it, but that usually involves the use of your hands, or some other physical force.
This is incorrect. Even if you can't do a telekinesis, there are still other ways for you to move an object without touching it. How someone could do that is up to you to figure out, however.

>>40514963
Maybe you shouldn't be on the board then, girl!

>>40517232
>How someone could do that is up to you to figure out, however.
Sounds like a copout. You make a statement and immediately try to prevent any questions regarding "how" (how could one do that, how do you know that) anyone would make for verification.

>>40517245
That's correct. I've already explicitly told you why repeatedly.
You will certainly be presented with the end goal. How you get there is up to you.
Do you think we're having a private conversation currently?

>>40517232
You misunderstand. If it is your WILL to move an object, the simplest method is usually your hands. That being said, the universe could just as well push it with a gust of wind, or some other physical means.

Again, I am talking about the power of WILL, not the pretend power of telekinesis.

>>40517314
Once again, explore alternatives to making objects move outside of physically interacting with them. If you're clever, you'll find ways to solve the riddle.

>>40517252
>That's correct. I've already explicitly told you why repeatedly.
I am not whatever anon you were talking with previously, you did not tell me anything explicitly nor repeatedly. I also tracked your exchange back to >>40517131 and you have not told that anon either.
>You will certainly be presented with the end goal. How you get there is up to you.
End goals are easy. It's actual path to realizing them that's the trick. If you cannot provide that, just affirm things without backing it up with any method of verification, your statement can be as well taken for bullshit.
>Do you think we're having a private conversation currently?
Given your assumption about my identity, I'd say you're the one suffering this misconception.

>>40517336
>you did not tell me anything explicitly nor repeatedly
That isn't what is being said with those words. I'm mentioning that I've communicated with "You", as in anyone watching or paying attention to my posts so far in the thread.
>not that anon either
Great but I've made plenty of posts in this thread and it didn't begin there.
>It's actual path to realizing them that's the trick.
That's the point.
>taken for bullshit.
Alright.
>my identity
>your misconception
Are you feeling okay? That's a lot of misunderstandings.
Why do you people care about me proving things so badly? Go prove it for yourself. Be my guest. Just know that I tired to help you avoid their retarded circus of parlor tricks and the accompanying assholes that won't ever actually show you anything and just fuck with you instead.
To be clear, these are closely guarded secrets, the methodology. If you don't already have a means to do this intrinsically, you'd study from someone else. Naturally, certain parties out there don't want loads of people having easy access. Surely you, an adult, can understand why.

>>40517361
>I'm mentioning that I've communicated with "You", as in anyone watching or paying attention to my posts so far in the thread.
The hell? You're not responding to some incarnation of all anons, you're responding to particular anons.
>Great but I've made plenty of posts in this thread and it didn't begin there.
That's nice, but you're still an anon, I can only guess which posts are yours and since I see no particular methods given, I maintain my earlier observation:
If you cannot provide that, just affirm things without backing it up with any method of verification, your statement can be as well taken for bullshit.
>That's the point.
That's the idea.
Exactly.
And other ways to paraphrase and agree with my statement.
>Are you feeling okay? That's a lot of misunderstandings.
Right back at you, anon.
>Why do you people care about me proving things so badly? Go prove it for yourself. Be my guest.
Right after you provide practical, coherent method of doing so. Anyone can make wild claims, provide nothing to substantiate them and then tell others to prove it for themselves. It won't make those wild claims any less of a bullshit.
>Just know that I tired to help you avoid their retarded circus of parlor tricks and the accompanying assholes that won't ever actually show you anything and just fuck with you instead.
You didn't help it, you added to it by being another "accompanying asshole" rhar didn't show us anything (workable that'd let us verify your claims) and just tried to fuck with anons instead - because that's what making claims with no actionable information for anons to get there is.

>>40517421
>the definition of "You" is not plastic
Are you autistic?
>right back at you
No, you're the one coming at me with all these confusions. I've been here participating in the thread for quite a while interacting with loads of people. You just showed up and got confused once, not understanding that I was saying "You" as in a plurality of people instead of "You" as in specifically you, the guy being tagged in a post I made. This is a hilariously autistic thing to do. I take it you don't realize that.
>practical, coherent methods
Are you some spook or something?
Trying to van people, faggot?

>>40517431
>I've been here participating in the thread for quite a while interacting with loads of people
Which doesn't make your use of "You" any less silly. Then you hang on it while ignoring the main point of you talking out of your butt and making unsubstantiated claims, then stroking yourself over how you supposedly help people by telling them nothing of substance.
>Trying to van people, faggot?
If I'd be vaning people on a whim and you'd seriously believe that risk, you'd know better than to antagonize me or already on a trip no matter what you think you know.
The fact you're butthurt and yet yapping off when called out on your bullshit proves you don't believe me being a spook or yourself under any risk.

Therefore, it's all just an excuse to hide you have hardly any clue about ways of developing such abilities - no matter on what principle they'd work - and you're just a shit LARPer.

>you won't offer proof or share your secrets with us, so you're a LARPer
Slide.

A lot of talking and no one showing they can use telekinesis. I wonder why.

>>40506195
This is correct

It seems worth pursuing now that AGI is here

>>40517931
I'm flattered, anon. Be careful not to get sucked into the faggots trying to bait people.

the earth plane is by design not consciousness based. When you die you go to a place where you can make anything and create anything from nothing

I have some files on this for anyone interested, also its called psychokinetics/kinesis generally

>>40518392

Any solid evidence?

>>40518492

people across all various governments (USSR, US, UK, China, Japan) all spent a lot of money and time and supposed achieved some actionable results (on the remote viewing/telepathy side of things)

less so on psychokinesis

of course, each of these nations have also proposed flying/submarine aircraft carriers and spent a lot of time and money on other wacky things, so... take it as you will

here is the pic file, I have like 5 or 4 more

https://ia800301.us.archive.org/19/items/cia-readingroom-document-cia-rdp96-00792r000400350005-1/cia-rdp96-00792r000400350005-1_text.pdf>>40518797


fine, I'll link it (didn't want to upload)

>>40505538
>Is Penis a magent?

>>40507992
You have to understand that the most difficult part of telekinesis is to hide the strings.

>>40512404
You mean fucking eugenesic?

>>40514626
>Magnets, how the fuck do they work?

>>40518797
>people across all various governments (USSR, US, UK, China, Japan) all spent a lot of money and time and supposed achieved some actionable results (on the remote viewing/telepathy side of things)
[Citation needed]

>>40519181
>[Citation needed]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleb_Bokii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekhterev_Psychoneurological_Institute
Also to go deeper in this rabbit holeyou have to have a vpn to access leninka* content [*one of the Russian online libraries] if you are in europe or us.

>>40501852 (OP)
Yes but if your body have no traces of melanin.
It was genetically added as a psychic and telekinetic inhibitor to the slave races by the creators, which also made their souls very weak

According to the scriptures of the star farers the melanated have 1/777th of a soul of a normal human being.

If you have pure white body and soul you can tab into that power and do wonders.

It's why michael jackson changed his skin color and why they killed him, becaue he managed to unlock that power with his feeble soul.

>>40518038
Thanks for the care. No worry though. On telekinesis, I find the practice very tiresome. It's really hard to maintain belief even for a few minutes. Are you experienced in this or have you only seen the theoretical path? Now as I mentioned there is a new motivation: doing something a machine can't. But I had my first tries 15 years ago, with those light "psy wheels" lol. Every couple of years I added at most 10 minutes to my practice of telekinesis.

>>40520291
As stated >>40506293, of course I can't... maybe.
>theoretical path
It may be "theory", but it's not mine. Spherical "weaponry" from Costa Rica is a very, very fun idea. Few, by this point, should be familiar with the reference, let alone be able to actually understand what was revealed to them. It isn't some competition or anything, but I'm rather confident I understand what the reference was about. Perhaps "whom", even.

>>40513035
Except for a lot of chatter, no one in this thread has the slightest ability to produce telekinesis.

>>40501852 (OP)
It's not real and not possible. The stupid cunts in this thread who say otherwise are retarded, and can only present as evidence gay/fake videos and/or super hypothetical "scientific" papers with fudged statistics.

topkek obvious bot posts