He was off by the dates, but it's time to admit he was right

>>40525115 (OP)
>he was wrong, but it's time to admit he was right

>>40525115 (OP)
No, Titor was a fraud. And he outed himself as a fraud the second he tried to "explain" how time travel works. Also if he's wrong about the dates like you admitted then that still makes him a fraud. Are you retarded?

>>40525115 (OP)
If you made a time machine, you have to calculate and handle the position of the Earth. The Earth is moving. If you traveled into the future, you might appear at the same point in space but with no Earth where it was before you left.

>>40527516
Been awhile since I read his stuff IIRC they accounted for the movement of the Earth somehow. IDGAF enough to double check though

>>40525115 (OP)
If he was living with his own family when he wrote the posts like he said, that seriously narrows the window he could be right. Pretty soon timeline-native John will be older than time traveler John was, which of course breaks the timeline.
It's always possible that his actions prevented his timeline from coming true but that's cope.
>>40527516
>>>reddit

>>40527682
only a fellow traveler or browser of that other site would know that
checkmate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jcLTM3LcAA

>>40525115 (OP)
You know deep down he was some Gen x internet fag and the first larper.

>>40527516
unless gravity is dimensionally preserved during time travel

>>40528333
To add to that, gravity is just really theory anyways

>>40527516
It's "travel" not "teleportation" you fucking smoothbrain faggot. Assuming you just accelerate time or reverse without the effect occuring outside the machine, it also means that the machine stay anchored to the other laws, it just moves imperceptably fast around the machine so the other laws of nature will still apply because the machine is static. You can't even conceptualize abstract concepts, jesus christ.

>>40528394
meant to say occurring inside the machine but whatever

>>40525115 (OP)

Prove it or fuck of

>>40528394
well, sir, I happen to believe that "travel" as you describe it would be in violation of Einsteinian physics. Alternatively, if it were possible to transmit electronically a proxy copy of oneself to another, parallel dimension that was shifted in time to the desired destination, then it would be technically possible. Of course, you would die and be copied every time you time travel or "teleport" as you say. Personally, I prefer the kind of time travel where I don't die. You can yell about your concepts all you want, but I like to base things in reality.

>>40530747
Except none of what you just said is based in reality and all you do is speculate as I just did. I'm just saying you're not applying occams razor and if you're using a machine then said machine has to have a static placement on the earth that manipulates time except for the area inside the machine. Period. You can throw out gobbledygook some more or whatever the fuck your type of fag enjoys but none of what you said is based more or less than science than what I just said, mine is just a whole lot more logically coherent.

>>40525115 (OP)
Like Titor said, the elites (using CERN) are sending particles back in time to make us switch timelines often, meaning things won't be exactly as he said anymore.

>>40527516
He mentioned this point specifically, supposedly they cracked time time travel before cracking the gravity lock to stay in the same position, so their test devices ended up crashing into the Earth miles away for short test jumps.

what of the lawyer, Larry Haber, who claims to have been hired by the present day family

>>40525115 (OP)
yup, he was probably right about the timelines shit too. surprising, i thought he was way off.

>>40530747
actually it doesn't violate relativity. it's an epr bridge. and it means that many worlds is either true or the chronological protection conjecture is false.

>>40534553
all the mandela effects have me leaning towards the cpc not being true.

>>40534563
Which also debunks the butterfly effect, a fucking cornucopia disappears from the logo of everyone's underwear and that doesn't affect history at all.

>>40527682
He supposedly stopped Y2k which altered the whole timeline to what you see now.

>>40525120
First post best post.
It’s over OP.
Titor was debunked heavily years ago, let it die,

>>40525115 (OP)
If I remember correctly, the explanation of how time travel worked was a sound principle.

>>40527516
>The Earth is moving.

>>40527516
I also played the Steins;Gate visual novel

The ding dong talked about WW3 and civil war happening way before 2025 (if I’m not mistaken). I don’t remember any of that happening

>>40536803
Is it good?

>>40534582
this is what all the wave collapse stuff is about. where is the cause, and where is the effect, and what is just along for the ride?

in fact the butterfly effect comparison is interesting because it as if the butterfly disappeared, but the effect was still there!

>>40535085
why would you give a fuck, go debunk the succubus thread.
see?

>>40536761
you would have to determine what the EPR bridge was using to merge time and space. i assume gravity, which would be useful to detect, but not for the planet position as much as the gravity "condition" which would contain the position, but not in coordinate context; rather is a "state resolution" context of the "condition" you're trying to enter.

>>40525120