>Like zoinks ‘Scoob were so fucked.

>>40532201 (OP)
Seems like total nonsense. Explain.

>>40532224
Read the text in the image, it’s pretty simple

>>40532240
Doesn't make any fucking sense.

>>40532247
red dot bad!

>>40532247
I'm a dot enjoyer but honestly this anon is right the explanations make zero fucking sense

>>40532201 (OP)

>>40532353
>>40532247
>>40532224
Lmao it makes perfect sense, essentially our consciousness affects the random numbers and if it’s blue or red something is happening or about to happen.

Blue is essentially peace and enlightenment and red is chaos and “happening”, I disagree with >>40532268.

>>40532508
>Blue is essentially peace and enlightenment and red is chaos and “happening
Yeah i get that but how exactly do the explanations on the page say this.

>>40532542
Their trying to say our collective conscIousness influences the numbers, when ever something happens there’s a rise in our collective consciousness’s activity, thats how anon.

Also now the dot is almost blue, in all my life and all of the time I have observed this dot it’s always been either green, yellow, orange and something always happens on red.

>>40532800
Yeah but "deeply shared internally motivated group focus" and "broadly shared coherence of thought and emotion" sound like synonyms.

>>40532224
>>40532247
>>40532353

https://global-mind.org/science2.html#hypothesis

>>40533345
Can you give a QRD

>>40532993
This may be a mandela effect, I recall their old meanings were concise and with opposite meanings.

There are two big astrological events today, Mars square Uranus and Jupiter square Saturn in the 1st degree. Saturn and Jupiter are giants, they move slowly and any aspects they form are significant.

>>40532201 (OP)
Data for the dot isn't available on their site. Are they really not publicly tracking its history somewhere? Is this page all you get?

>>40532201 (OP)
Tomorrow this shit will be blue stop worrying tard

>>40532201 (OP)
Blue: Collective unconsciousness strong.
Red: Strong sense of individual identity, less cohesion of the collective

I don't think either one is bad unless it's sustained for a really long time.

>>40532201 (OP)
admittedly, statistically speaking this is a weird pattern.

>>40534040
what about pingponging between them?

>>40534126
Steady, rhythmic bounce makes perfect sense. We like to separate, become individuals, seek a whole again and start that all over. It's unnatural when it stays at one or the other for too long.

>>40534040
Thank you for finally explaining this in a nonretarded jargonfilled way

>>40533852
Wounded tyrannical power in its fall being challenged by abundant caring and sensitivity over a clash of laws and values.

Protests, rebellion, volatility.

Huh, isn't that funny.

You know, I wonder if there's people using astrology to invest in the stock market. I feel like they'd be making a killing, it's practically insider trading in a way.

>>40534146
a rhythmic bounce in the greens, sure. as the chart says, the polar ends are the furthest 5%. Hitting them is abnormal period.

Red, Loooong Red, Dark Blue, Red, that's a very unusual.

>>40532201 (OP)
Ah yes, the larp ball of doom that doesn’t reflect anything at all

>>40534285

It is a glorified mood ring but the idea is kinda funny.

>>40533875
Do not ponder the dot

>>40532247
red dot bad, blue dot bad, yellow dot bad, orange dot bad, all dot bad.

>>40532993
This is exactly the issue I kept having when trying to understand the image. I'm also not fully certain which is which. Should we see Blue or Red as a good thing?
Personally, Blue seems like it means a narrow range of variance between consciousnesses, showing an alignment of sorts between a plethora of parties. This would indicate that Blue means many people are thinking the same and they're easily manipulated or something similar. Red would mean, instead, that there is a diversity of thought (not the bad kind of diversity) and that it's harder to do a psyop, start a war, crash an economy, etc. due to the resulting disparity or coherence in the thoughtform being projected materializing.
As an example, to me, I'd understand staying on Red during this Israeli and Iran affair to mean that we're not going to be so easily psyoped into starting WW3 or something along those lines.
The way it's set up currently, I don't know which is which. I don't know if I should rejoice or freak the fuck out.

>>40534238
That's a mighty big pond you're swimming in there, little fish.

>>40534238
My read is more like a fervent, disciplined boundary is breached by a force earnestly committed to proper growth where it's presently malnourished. In conjunction with this, we're looking at the possibility of flagrant and serious War being balanced by a sturdy, independent, dissent.
Today's particular theme is a bit of ubiquitous, sort or ephemeral look into a clearer picture of reality. Maybe something gets released today that clears up some loose ends we've dealt with recently.

>>40532353

Alright who's the fucker that is strongly interpreting the dot?

>>40536252
Seems plausible desu