>>40562203
>Most cattle multilations are near nuclear sites, and the cattle are completely drained of blood.
>Look at the message they are sending.
>They're saying 'we can fuck u up by treating you like cattle but we choose not to'.
Excellent post, was coming here to suggest something like this.
It’s a message and a symbol, and also reflects on the worst of mankind’s proclivities. As
>>40560447 mentions,
>humans do that and much worst every single day, but don't see you complaining.
I think it’s a flexing of power. It’s a definite message and symbol. It’s not meant to worry or threaten anyone who’s an intrinsically good person and derives their power and meaning from a higher source than themselves and their egoism, but to those humans who think of everything as power-struggles, violence, domination. Corrupt law enforcement, military, government members.
Any mutilation of a human, on the other hand, would be carried out by negative ETs, or even by malevolently-oriented intelligence agents as a false flag or as illegal human experimentation. From what I understand, there’s a sort of “cosmic law” in place that sincerely good, or at least slightly better than neutral/not-tending-towards-totally-evil-and-corrupt humans do not get totally fucked up by malevolent ETs.
Think of it like animal cruelty or abuse laws, or anti-poaching laws. But agreed to by even more advanced extraterrestrial species or NHI (nonhuman intelligence), with even more advanced surveillance and protection possible. All schizo-sounding, but very possibly true. The note about these events occurring around nuclear bases, and lots of UFO sightings near them by decades (which by, the way we should rename ETVs [extraterrestrial vehicles] or something, when we believe they are that, instead of continuing to call them “unidentified”), also seems to be true and is very fascinating in its implications.
