Thread 40575133 - /x/ [Archived: 787 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/21/2025, 7:27:47 PM No.40575133
1743957953887203
1743957953887203
md5: 195d39bbe6377e3c5274bafc98563c65๐Ÿ”
Does the idea that the soul is feminine, and reason is masculine have any credibility?
Replies: >>40575414 >>40575516 >>40576704 >>40576718 >>40576810 >>40576836 >>40579599 >>40579619 >>40582205 >>40582219 >>40583489 >>40586397 >>40586465
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 7:47:41 PM No.40575241
Yeah, women are retarded
Replies: >>40575320 >>40576923 >>40579619
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 8:00:42 PM No.40575320
>>40575241
Women are also not more intuitive than men so them being soul also goes out the window.
Replies: >>40576688 >>40579619
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 8:15:10 PM No.40575414
>>40575133 (OP)
The feminine polarity can be considered more emotional, and the masculine one as leaning towards reason, but the soul possesses both.
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 8:16:09 PM No.40575424
unnamed (3)
unnamed (3)
md5: f1b237133c878b73c8d6c2b5b28491a3๐Ÿ”
Woman is mirror
>t. Real womb man
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 8:32:13 PM No.40575516
>>40575133 (OP)
>33
Ok, faggotmaster
>Does the idea that the soul is feminine, and reason is masculine have any credibility?
Women have an oscillating nature, compared to men.
And as men are more prone to be reasoned about, and women less likely to, you get this common sense all around tge world, that women are related to soul [that could is corruptible but can evolve to not be corrupt] and men are related to spirit and reason, that are immutable and incorruptible.
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 11:45:36 PM No.40576688
>>40575320
I think women are more intuitive in the sense of being more sensitive to spiritual phenomena. It's why women tend to be given over to magic and crystals and stuff like that, whereas men are more likely to be theologians who want an answer to everything
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 11:49:15 PM No.40576704
>>40575133 (OP)
in jew sol is femme
post soled btw im not jewish i swear
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 11:52:32 PM No.40576718
>>40575133 (OP)
Its false, masculinity and feminity exist in all things.
Replies: >>40576902
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 12:10:06 AM No.40576810
>>40575133 (OP)
I don't think the soul is materially feminine but is a sort of softer essence than the physical body and is described as feminine in poetic terms. The Church being the bride of Christ for example, Christians are not literally marrying God. But we have a less active role in our relationship with him on a cosmic scale. I digress. Your soul is whatever sex you are. You can't have a female soul if you're born male and vice versa.
Replies: >>40576902
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 12:13:30 AM No.40576836
>>40575133 (OP)
>the soul is feminine
no
>reason is masculine
yes
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 12:23:55 AM No.40576902
>>40576718
Always equally?
>>40576810
Feminine =/= female
Replies: >>40576960
HQ
6/22/2025, 12:26:50 AM No.40576923
>>40575241
Yup, fat incel virgins still existing here.
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 12:32:03 AM No.40576960
>>40576902
Look up or use an ai and ask it to tell you about hermeticism and gender, it might answer your questions.
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 11:19:40 AM No.40579599
1702959388744177
1702959388744177
md5: 38fb31b6666006a65c2b5fc45523a9c6๐Ÿ”
>>40575133 (OP)
I believe the spiritual is feminine, and the physical is masculine. And that the counterpart to reason is not soul, but emotions, and that reason is masculine whereas emotions are feminine. You need both reason and emotions to shape our physical and spiritual world. That's what makes us human after all.
Replies: >>40582231 >>40583475 >>40586365 >>40586391
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 11:24:51 AM No.40579619
>>40575133 (OP)
No. Women are more soulless than men.
>>40575241
This.
>>40575320
Women evolved more intuition as a threat detection mechanism because they are physically weak. They are intuitive when it comes to people ("icky", "creepy", etc), other than that they aren't.
Replies: >>40580968
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 5:32:25 PM No.40580968
>>40579619
Well their intuition is broken because women reject men for being "weird" while pursuing rapists, gangsters and serial killers all the time
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 9:55:35 PM No.40582205
>>40575133 (OP)
Souls are fake and gay.
Replies: >>40583475
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 9:57:41 PM No.40582219
>>40575133 (OP)
The soul has no gender. It's only a corporal bias factor.
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 10:00:33 PM No.40582231
>>40579599
Prolly like dis
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 1:13:55 AM No.40583475
>>40579599
Why would the spiritual be feminine but not the soul
Isnt the soul spiritual
>>40582205
Only for npcs
Replies: >>40583540 >>40586338 >>40586368
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 1:16:05 AM No.40583489
>>40575133 (OP)
Doubt it. The soul is probably both - like yin & yang.

Women are almost always more spiritual naturally and intuitive than men. Men are more degenerate, violent and driven by list, but in their best state they represent protection, power and order. Perfection would have both elements. The female and male.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 1:17:57 AM No.40583506
no.
Replies: >>40586319
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 1:22:01 AM No.40583540
>>40583475
everything is "souled", buffoon.
Replies: >>40586319
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:23:23 AM No.40586319
>>40583540
And this means?
>>40583506
Your post contributes nothing.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:28:44 AM No.40586338
GAvGm7UagAAxqMN
GAvGm7UagAAxqMN
md5: f38ea62aab3918f1be2b377e39dfaf46๐Ÿ”
>>40583475
>Why would the spiritual be feminine but not the soul
Isnt the soul spiritual

Yes, the soul is spiritual. Pardon the misunderstanding, but I wasn't trying to say or imply that the soul isn't of a feminine characteristic, I just didn't want to use that word because the word spiritual is more concise and all-encompassing in contrast towards the word physical. And that you shouldn't be comparing the word "soul" with "reason" from the first place, because the more accurate comparison to reason is emotions, not soul. And that ultimately, as I stated before, we as humans need both emotions and reason to help shape our physical and spiritual world, thus concluding that the feminine and masculine is important and necessary in their coexistence with each other in order for us to flourish as humans, both spiritually and physically.

That's what I've come to believe in, anyways.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:36:07 AM No.40586365
>>40579599
I disagree. I think that men are actually the emotional gender and feel emotions at a much deeper level than women. This is why majority of the best love songs are made by men about women, rather than the other way around. The vast majority of artists, musicians, and music producers are men. Man's love is sacrificial and idealistic, while woman's love is opportunistic.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:36:28 AM No.40586368
108133195_p0
108133195_p0
md5: d42b6e8e1ca048009de4670f1fab4a15๐Ÿ”
>>40583475
And one last thing, if I had to guess an accurate counterpart to soul, I'd say the brain fits that description perfectly. The brain is physical, the soul is spiritual. But they are two sides of the same coin, so to speak. They both exist alongside each other, that is also what ultimately forms our human consciousness as well. We can't have one without the other in my humble opinion.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:41:26 AM No.40586380
raisins-b2ef36b40733fd729a1541b873fa13c6
raisins-b2ef36b40733fd729a1541b873fa13c6
md5: f0d2c5f2e0778536b9a088adcc41ad1a๐Ÿ”
Interesting topic.

Yin is lunar, like a mirror that reflects light. It's not as dense in its self absorption and is more aery fairy in its disposition, being totally flexible and receptive. It's undefined chaos, like an exhale.

Yang would be the opposite. Keep in mind that Yin exists in Yang and vice-versa. It's Yin-Yang, not Yin and Yang for a raisin.
Replies: >>40586439
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:44:45 AM No.40586391
this idea has veritable history in philosophy. it played an important part in platonism, and in a lesser way also in aristotelianism.
>>40579599
i would say that the spiritual (being/the ontological) is masculine, and the "psychic" (literally soul) is feminine. the physical material reality is further detached from both of these.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:48:37 AM No.40586397
>>40575133 (OP)
Nah, gender is only a thing in the material, cause-effect realm we are in. Outside of this place we're energy that can be anything and everything.

Gender is necessary in this world, but it isn't outside of it.
Replies: >>40586439
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:48:42 AM No.40586398
tumblr_19df5d095b41e23a00c4dd17435f8ec9_d1a4e366_640
In other words, Yin is more immature and youthful, lacking any integrity in and of itself (ignoring the fact that the energies intersect), lacking discipline. It's totally receptive and sensual, but when in contact with Yang (Solar Vitality), it reflects it like the moon does the sun, and it can express itself in all kinds of crazy animalistic, or more refined ways depending on its desires and interpretation of the Yang at that instance.
Replies: >>40586409 >>40586415
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:53:17 AM No.40586409
>>40586398
By youthful, I mean baby-ish, infantile in its submissiveness, like an underdeveloped hairless baby. Yang is more radiant in its youthfulness.
Replies: >>40586416
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:55:26 AM No.40586415
GVWy1VWWsAAv-TI
GVWy1VWWsAAv-TI
md5: f7c3d1421d5648c40c0ce8cbd197bb7b๐Ÿ”
>>40586398
Blimey, that's one bloody moon, innit...
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:55:30 AM No.40586416
>>40586409
But of course, let me REMIND YOU. Normally, Yin wields Yang and isn't isolated to its own essence. It's vampiric and draws in/reflects Yang energy very well, which is why women can be so emotional and neurotic.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 10:04:39 AM No.40586439
>>40586397
I think gendered language is used in these discussions in a "for lack of better phrasing" sort of way
>>40586380
Why the raisin
Replies: >>40586451
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 10:06:59 AM No.40586451
>>40586439
>Keep in mind that Yin exists in Yang and vice-versa. It's Yin-Yang, not Yin and Yang for a raisin.

>It's Yin-Yang, not Yin and Yang for a raisin.

>raisin.
Replies: >>40588263
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 10:10:44 AM No.40586465
>>40575133 (OP)
โ€œAnd Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.โ€ (1 Timothy 2:14)
Replies: >>40588263 >>40588888
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 6:20:28 PM No.40588263
>>40586451
Ok cute
>>40586465
Not saying this isn't related but can you extrapolate please
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 7:55:17 PM No.40588888
>>40586465
Fucking this
Replies: >>40589308
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:07:55 PM No.40589308
>>40588888
Checked