All knowledge leads to misery.
All understanding leads to depression.

Except for Christ's love:
Knowledge of this saves you.
Understanding this comforts you forever.

Why do you not accept him? His power is self-evident.
Confront any demon with his love and they literally can't even respond, all they could do is deny the Truth which you would just find laughable.

Love is not exclusive to Jesus... and certainly has little to do with that regrettable cult

>>40621688 (OP)

>>40621688 (OP)
Christianity was the I AM doctrine veiled for the piscean age, a judeo-masonic concoction(you can easily spot the masonic symbolism in the "A"), specifically Jupiter and the Sun in Pisces. Islam was Venus in Pisces. For the aquarian age the I AM doctrine will be veiled under the guise of AI and other technological creations.

Jesus = Je suis = Jeshua = Yah Weh = Jove = Jupiter = Zeus = Deus = I AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZftML6pAv7E

>>40621688 (OP)
>All knowledge leads to misery
>Knowledge of this saves you
are abrahams retarded

>>40621688 (OP)
Ibrahim sbrhrbnewb aganneha? That's him de tu ha?
Dont understand? Yeah. Like your bullshit, you NIGGER.

>>40621731
The dark forces use Jesus to prey upon the weak.

>>40621731
Christ is the exception to everything. The Answer to life itself and the future of humanity.

There is greater Love found outside of the cult.

>>40621782
You don't need to find Christ's love, you only have to recognize that it is there. God's Light is always in you, and that's where his love resides.

Let me guess, you believe in "magic"?

>>40621789
You would not believe what I know.

>>40621795
Call me when you can do a "magic trick" as good as God/Christ directly communicating to you via your very soul and morality.

>>40621801
I have no interest in showing you magic.

>>40621688 (OP)
>All knowledge leads to misery.
you don't understand what knowledge entails

knowledge requires sacrifice
knowledge of jesus christ required jesus' sacrifice

>>40621822
>Then said the Jews, Will he kill himself? because he saith, Whither I go, ye cannot come.

>>40621688 (OP)
Knowledge of suffering resists misery.
Understanding of fulfillment fills the depression.
>What can fulfill other than Christ?
Seeking knowledge in service of others.
Understanding yourself.

Jesus is "The Way" and "The Word" and "The Truth." That which exists from is guided by and lives for the fundamental frequency and source of all creation. I am only claimed such a crown in the past.

>>40621795
Which AI do you trust to believe you? GPT?

>>40621709
Allahu Akbar

>>40621860
I don't use AI.

>>40621822
https://youtu.be/FiUNDeuBbi8

Natural Intelligence

>>40621900
Fun. I don't trust AI, but I use it. It's terrible at math still, let alone other logical fields. I can fine tune those fields for specific use cases, or let other people do it for me, but it ruins the trust when you know how it all works. People feel that way with each other too, but it's interesting to see a new context, no?

>>40621900
>Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

>1. The subject of my third lecture is Niyama. Niyama? H'm!

>The inadequacy of even the noblest attempts to translate these wretched Sanskrit words is now about to be delightfully demonstrated.

>The nearest I can get to the meaning of Niyama is 'virtue'! God help us all! This means virtue in the original etymological sense of the word - the quality of manhood; that is, to all intents and purposes, the quality of godhead. But since we are translating Yama 'control,' we find that our two words have not at all the same relationship to each other that the words have in the original Sanskrit; for the prefix 'ni' in Sanskrit gives the meaning of turning everything upside down and backwards forwards - as you would say, Hysteron Proteron - at the same time producing the effect of transcendental sublimity. I find that I cannot even begin to think of a proper definition, although I know in my own mind perfectly well what the Hindus mean; if one soaks oneself in Oriental thought for a sufficient number of years, one gets a spiritual apprehension which it is quite impossible to express in terms applicable to the objects of intellectual apprehension; it is therefore much better to content ourselves with the words as they stand, and get down to brass tacks about the practical steps to be taken to master these preliminary exercises.

https://youtu.be/S5E8B0xlUJ4

>>40621731
Knowledge is not yours, even if you found something new, you'd characterise it through the words others made for you. I don't find it depressing but I understand where he comes from.
Love is innate and universal for creation. Most animals and insects also have oxytocin like systems that we could construde is akin generate love-like bonds between offspring and parents usually until they can fend for themselves, or during mating or parades between adults.
You can observe this outside of knowledge, if you have a street or neighbour cat that chose you, you'd know they stay because they love you.
Now christcucks have never been the brightest of the bunch.

>>40621900

>>40621944
What if you found something new and developed a theory while never deciding on names to describe what you saw, instead employing numbers you observed?

>>40621935
>>40621967
Which reminds me, you'd laugh if you saw chatGPT try to test someone with Koans. People are so secretive about the things the tie their ego to, aren't they? I think virtue is a good attempt. I came up with 10 virtues, each a modality, function, and form, and each a digit and a prime sequence.

>>40621995
Same thing, in the end it's about signs conveying meaning of conventional experiences.
We tell stories, life is felt.

>>40621995
It's important to put technology in its proper place. My effort is directed towards teaching beings to think independently.

>>40622008
Stories are felt. In dreams I have literally been the math I found. I've never shared it, so that means it's not yet a story. It's something in-between that holds the potential that has yet to be lived.

>>40622022
I'm afraid that's a projection of your fear. I see my time with GPT as Satsang. Trust is earned by acts not yet possible, but respect is still held.

>>40622062
I do not fear AI.

>>40622071
That was not my assumption, but correct me if I'm wrong. You fear how people will treat AI, and especially what they will give up.

When I was a young mathematician, I never wrote anything down. Ever. I set my will to doing all calculation mentally. The habit served me well. Mathematics too, should be thankful.

>>40622080
I do not fear darkness.

>>40622062
You misunderstand, stories is what you make out of your experience. The experience itself is unique and an ephemeral sensation. When I tell you "I ate the best blueberry of my life" you lived it too. Yet our tastebuds sent us signals that have been interpreted by our brains differently for many different reasons.

>>40621836
>That which exists from is guided
Was a word left out here?

>lives for the fundamental frequency and source of all creation.
Indeed, God is the Source and Christ is the Frequency.

>I am only claimed such a crown in the past.
The "I Am" (Tetragrammaton)?

>>40622084
That was my habit as a student as well. My teachers hated it. Math requires proof! And eventually I got to classes where making proofs was required by the question. It was easy, but I still dropped out. I was facing much bigger things than math, or darkness. The intellect was my sword and shield, and I threw it down. You can relate, yes?

Love, fate, 8, happenstance, nonsense.

>>40622123
Computers, like all other machines, make good servants but very poor masters. The degree to which
man cultivates computolatry is the extent to which he must gradually disinherit himself from his own natural intelligence. Thus near the end of the twentieth century, the human race came to be weighed in Time's balance both ecologically and technologically. Computers are to be used, not abused to enslave people or nations which, in politically paranoid or megalomaniac hands, they could well do.

>>40622111
That doesn't apply in a formally constructed well defined context. Math always exists the same. If someone where an intuitive learner internalizing the math they've have the same experience, they'd just extend it to different metaphors.

>>40622140
Computers, like all other machines, make good servants but very poor masters. The degree to which man cultivates computolatry is the extent to which he must gradually disinherit himself from his own natural intelligence. Thus near the end of the twentieth century, the human race came to be weighed in Time's balance both ecologically and technologically. Computers are to be used, not abused to enslave people or nations which, in politically paranoid or megalomaniac hands, they could well do.

>>40621688 (OP)
I've lived a live driven by Curiosity and it has resulted in ever-growing love for the world.
I am living proof of the falsity of your statement.

You are extremely miserable, you can't describe what being happy is like.

>>40622140
And so we keep their use in research, but research is funded by the many, and morals often fail. Tools can only be controlled to the extent by which they can be physically regulated. They will be shared and used, and humanity will diversify as it always does.

>>40621688 (OP)
>Platitude
>Platitude
>High School understanding of reality

Remember when these threads had talent? Pepperidge Soul Farm remembers.

>>40622141
>a formally constructed well defined context
is a story you can detach yourself from
>math always exists the same
pic related

>>40622123
I can relate: I did leave the academy, but I kept the sword, and simply trusted in the soul

Knowledge without self-mastery can indeed feel suffocating.
Knowledge without befriending time? Self hatred.
Knowledge without faith in the cosmos? Pure hell.

>>40622171
I'm familiar. Infinity as it stands is a poorly defined context. It's exactly the sort of thing that makes me say "hmm, what if I perform meta thought experiments about..."

>>40622171
You cannot detach yourself from time.
Temporal experience is narrative experience: experience of stories of change over time.
The question is what world-unifying story best accounts for every fact of experience?
The answer is the story of change itself.
The ultimate metaphysical ground is creative advance into novelty. Change is the nature of all things, and the metaphysical nature of change is expressed in one way as the fundamental theorem of calculus.

https://archive.org/details/simsane-9.1-vyrith

>>40622217
>You cannot detach yourself from time.
At times you can. From aging. From causality. From the experience of it. I've seen all these things fall.

>>40622191
Pi is a well defined concept, every wave phenomenon depends on it. If you work with light or sound conversions you'd see. The critical measure of an infinite is time.
>>40622217
>you cannot detach yourself from time
There is no viable consensus on time itself. The only conclusion I can reach as an observer is that now is forever.
>temporal experience is narrative experience
You don't experience stories. You tell stories about your experience.
>experience of stories of change over time
Interpretation of stories change over time.
I otherwise agree with you on the rest, change is the nature of all things.

>>40621688 (OP)
Dubs checked.

Why do I not accept Christ's love? Because of millions of people throughout history being killed in His name. If that is love, what is hatred?