What are the odds of a real life event mirroring a film.

Best one is Lone Gunmen -Pilot S1E1 vs 9/11/01

Another was Netflix "White Noise"

"The Netflix movie White Noise, which features a train derailment and chemical spill, was released in November 2022, before the East Palestine train derailment in February 2023, according to news sources. White Noise was filmed in Ohio, and some East Palestine residents were extras in the movie."

East Palestine citizens were extra's in White Noise. I mean WTF

>>40643617
Predictive programming

>>40643607 (OP)
we don't know if predictive programming is real but we do know that coincidences happen literally all over the world every day

hmmmm i wonder which one it could be hmmmmmm

>>40643642
I mean this is true. I've come across a few coincidences that seem like life is effen with my mind but so many commonalities and of course, Hollywood hires former Feds in different fields to write "nightmare situations" but then again Predictive ProgramMING (Thanks for the correction anon) is that they want to desensitize citizens as to not question such a thing as an "inside job or conspiries"

>>40643607 (OP)

Summoning rituals

>>40643621
Is such a pointless thing to ever look into.
Not saying it is t real, I'm saying researching it useless and a waste of time.
No one can use current programming to say what is being predicted.
No one has ever co.e in here and pointed to a scene and said when it would happen and be anything close to accurate.
So what's the point?
And again, as everyone prepares to scream glowie, I am assuming it is real, it does happen.

>>40643996
to desensitize society. that they are normalizing a horrible scenario in film that suddenly become reality. or they can even use the film to say "You're being hyperbolic for even suggesting the similarities)
this is the reason for it. Not for us to see if we can flag it as an up and coming event. it's psychological. "In first" and then mockery and denial when someone sees it. They try and normalize this and then shut you down for being a conspiracy nut. that is the purpose of it

>>40644019
>this is the reason for it
Didn't ask.
I asked why research it, and you couldn't answer.
I challenged that there is no ability to point to any programming and state the prediction and when.
And you didn't even try.
You were so quick to regurgitate lore that you didn't bother to understand what was being asked.

>>40643996
They claim that the elites must play by the "rules". That is that the universe, or God, is a positive entity of consciousness. And it would prevent bad things from happening unless we agree to it.

By telling us what they'll do to us, and then denying it as a claiming it's a "conspiracy theory".

I still don't buy this since this is not really a consent is it? I'm starting to doubt God is all loving and such.

>>40644189
Another person whose only thought is to explain what I already know.

Here, let me get you think beyond a bit more.
Other anon said it's about desensitizing. Well, how do these threads counteract that?
These threads HELP the desensitization.
By coming out and trying to spread around that fiction is reality, you are INCREASING the amount of desensitization people will have when they find out about reality.

So these threads do nothing to counter all these agendas you worry about, and they most likely help by expediting the desensitization.
So why help them in this way?

>>40644417
you see how irritated we are about it?
they know.
it's like an "adjuvant", where the central narrative is the "medicine". they're like little cheat sheets. two people who understand this can also communicate more easily; helps built language through context. the older movies were to induce the hero. the newer movies provide the atmosphere for the hero. it mirrors life because God is real and living.

>>40643642
Another one of them coincidence theorists I see.

>>40644841
>you see how irritated we are about it?
No? The responses I've gotten are like dead-eyed zoo employees explaining the monkeys for the millionth time.
>they know.
Okay. The elites doing predictive programming know that we make threads about it.
Yeah - that's what I said, and they greatly appreciate these threads because all it does is desensitize people even more to the the topic of the predictive programming.

Just think about this: who is going to react with more sensitivity to the reveal that the government has been working with aliens for hundreds of years?
>a guy who watches Stargate and thinks it is fiction
>a guy who believes the theory that the government has been working with aliens for hundreds of years and uses media to soft disclose this fact
The first might have SOME surprise.
The second will have none, and just go "I knew it!"
Anyone who wants people desensitized to such things is delighted by the person who already believes it.

>>40644189
>I'm starting to doubt God is all loving and such.
My current theory is that the gods let people make up their own gods and lie about it and enslave people to prove how evil those people are, then said gods will correct things. I hope it's not just hope.

>>40643607 (OP)
It always makes more sense after the fact. A random number generator should pick the same number several times in a row or it isn't truly random. Attempts to prevent this removes the "randomness." Between the need to feel special "we tried to tell you" and people getting off on fucking with other people's heads (insert random 3 letters here) anything is possible.

>>40644019
They usually make an overly dramatic movie so that becomes the public perception of what is too far, then in real life as long as they don’t go that far people think there is nothing to fight.


The Seige and 9/11. Then by the time Boston bombing comes around they even claim that wasn’t martial law.