>>40755667
>This is how they siphon money.
You are too stupid to see my point. This would be a TERRIBLE way to siphon money, when there are ways to get so much more, and with so much less public scrutiny.
>There is only so many 2008's and Covids you can pull before people start asking questions.
So you think regularly putting out fake projects and faking a fucking moon landing is going to be less risky and have people ask less questions than just saying you are trying to develop the next fighter plane, and getting two or three times the money without ever needing to fake anything?
Again - that is retarded.
The very fact that you exist shows how retarded it is.
You have never once in your life questioned developing the F22.
But you have spent way too much of your life asking questions about NASA and moon landings.
There is no grand conspiracy about the F-22 being fake.
There IS one about every aspect of NASA being fake.
So why would they choose the WORSE option?
>>40755668
you never actually read that did you?
>“a lot of double, triple, and quadruple counting of the same money as it got moved between accounts”
"Trillions of dollars" didnt go missing. They never existed in the first place.
Billions were counted two, three, four extra times.
The problem was departments not reporting that they moved money.
So A has $10, and gives it to B but doesnt record that.
So now, on the books, A has $10 AND B has $10, and then B gives it to C.
So now A,B, and C each have $10. Now we have $30, except we can only find $10.
$20 has "gone missing."
