>>40775403
So
>>40775485 is a retard and you should feel compelled to either mock them openly or ignore them. I don't suggest much else.
>>40775489 No they were not "actual dragons" like you're familiar with in the movies or anime or whatever you're getting this from.
"Dragon" meant something really very specific, a particular group of people. Have you really not been seeing these conversations lately, anon? I'm sort of surprised. Do I need to work harder? I was under the impression enough of you were annoyed with this. I sure don't mind though, so allow me.
"Dragon" isn't the only identifier. You've called them plenty of names, like Serpent or Druid. I guess if depending on where else you were it may have been Brahmin or Chaldean (so they say). Ultimately, they were residual Atlantean bloodline members. They were responsible for rebuilding things after the Pleistocene ended due to MWP-1b, causing loads of floods particularly in the Western Hemisphere. It does appear more local events occurred several times sense then, namely in the Mediterranean area, which also contributed to their dramatic dispersal and persistent rehoming.
Sure, "Tree-Knower" might have been the etymological link to "Druid", but the idea was a reference to a Priest-King just like as their foreign reflections discussed before.
You'd all call them Wizards today, not being able to understand what they were doing or why (it appears that hasn't changed much). They were responsible for housing vast amounts of knowledge and spreading it to the other surviving parties after the Ice Age retreated. In many areas they visited, the ancestors of the locals began Cargo Cults and repeated their stories many times.
The reason people like Hancock are called racist when they tell you about this is because the people in question all had very clear identifiers, which, if you were all permitted to better understand, you'd recognize to indicate they were inarguably white people (usually with red hair).
