>>40816743
>It practically means it's bad for you.
Not really, the choice is there, it's just recommend that you not take it.
Think of it like Easy mode or hard mode; at the end of the day, neither is good or bad, but the option is there. One is not recommended, doesn't mean it's bad, just that it's not recommended.
What you choose to do or not do honestly is free of outside morals or ethics, or subjective viewpoints of others; what you get in return of your choice is ultimately left accountable to you.
If you view that as bad, that is because you view it specifically as bad, likewise if you view it as good.
It's less to do about Good/Bad and more so about personal accountability in making a decision. All decisions are ultimately neutral, the consequences of them must be answered, and whether or not you register them as Good or Bad is subjective to you.
Case in point.
"If you punch me in the stomach, I am going to slash your eyes, because that is the natural consequence of the action; if you see that as Bad, that's your subjective take on it, and a choice you must take responsibility for. Would I recommend it? No, not really; but I can't really stop you, nor myself if you choose to make that decision.
tl;dr.
Choices are ultimately neutral; the consequences for the choices are ultimately subjective of the actor and audience; but ultimately must be answered for accordingly.
