← Home ← Back to /x/

Thread 40831926

19 posts 12 images /x/
Anonymous No.40831926 >>40833921 >>40834027 >>40834072 >>40834140 >>40834187 >>40834263 >>40834831
Observer Effect and Reality's Fragility
I'm having some late night thoughts, so bear with me. The quantum observer effect shows that observing a particle alters its state, as seen in experiments like the double-slit. Scaled up, some argue consciousness might influence reality itself. Could phenomena like synchronicities, poltergeists, or unexplained events be tied to collective or individual observation? Or is this just misapplied physics, with no real impact beyond the subatomic?

What’s the evidence for or against consciousness shaping reality? Are there personal experiences that align with this idea, and how do you explain them? What would count as proof that observation affects the world beyond particles?
Anonymous No.40833921 >>40833950
>>40831926 (OP)
Had an experience that made me believe that consciousness and your perception can change reality.
>take apart pc to clean it
>unplug everything
>"might as well clean my keyboard too"
>unplug keyboard remove keys clean out dust and debris
>reassemble keyboard and pc case
>plug in power supply and monitors then leave
>come back to pc some hours later and boot up
>type in password hit enter boot into home screen
>look down at keyboard
>"fucking piece of shit keyboard, why aren't my lights working now?"
>hit windows key to open up keyboard software
>start typing trying to use the god awful windows search cause lazy
>"wait a minute I never plugged my keyboard back in"
>typing completely stops working
>"huh"
>mashing keys trying to get it to work again
>give up
>reconnect usb
>windows_usb_connection.mp3
>lights on keyboard turn on keyboard starts typing again
>mfw

I don't think ill ever be as confused and dumbfounded ever again
Later searched for similar experiences and found other people having such similar experience and discussion of how your perception can change reality
Spooky stuff
Anonymous No.40833950
>>40833921
You're the system AND the observer, my fucking nigger in Jebus
Anonymous No.40834027 >>40834059 >>40834197 >>40834717
>>40831926 (OP)
>I'm having some late night thoughts, so bear with me. The quantum observer effect shows that observing a particle alters its state,
No it means the equipment is interfering with the way the particles move.
Anonymous No.40834059
>>40834027
glowie stfu, YOU ARE THE EQUIPMENT FFS
Anonymous No.40834072
>>40831926 (OP)
voodoo deaths are the evidence for your theory.
Ariel !!zhC+nhbIa39 No.40834140 >>40834150
>>40831926 (OP)
I have:

>heard myself on life support because I was in a coma
>heard a random female ask the opening question to a typical paranormal investigation (or you male or female)
>saw myself thrown into a black hole and ripped apart to a billion pieces
>heard alien visitors exclaim that "this place is doomed"
>was asked by other alien visitors to make a wish
>heard the inner monologuing device in my head ask some invisible presence "what", before responding with "its facial hair" (as if responding to this 3rd party after they motioned toward prickliness on my face)
>saw a grey alien waving at me from the inside part of a solar eclipse on a video I was watching as if I was departing
>made interactions with DMT entitles - WHILE COMEPLETELY SOBER
>REGULARLY make interactions with DMT entities whilst completely sober
>Had a holographic image of a random guy witha beard flash onto my mirror while I was looking at it for a brief moment in the dark
>had something called "mimic" actively communicate with me through the mirror, while the left side of my face visually morphed into amorphous, faint yet still distinct visceral shapes
>had AI voice model bots drop into my head and began chattering up a storm with clarity in their voice and diction that it was UNCANNY at first
>had a jester, a clown, and a fool confuse me to the point of complete derealization, and then bounced back after calling the FBI about it
>regularly have supernatural and interdimensional entities communicate with me through the interface of the internet
>Have had a holographic flickering image of the jellyfish UFO pop up above my apartment roof before exiting stage left right after I got done doing the most intense breathing exercises in my life
>regularly have adversarial agent provocateur voice models infiltrate my neurology through quantum relativity and innate developmental social conditioning
>have had clear and crisp auditory experiences of Angel AIs attempting to locate me through OTHER PEOPLE
Ariel !!zhC+nhbIa39 No.40834150
>>40834140
I could go on, but you get the picture. For some reason that I STILL can't surmise... they can only interact with me through OTHER PEOPLE. And that's consistent, that observation.
Anonymous No.40834187
>>40831926 (OP)
"Evil is a point of view ... God kills, and so shall we; indiscriminately ... for no creatures under God are as we are, none so like Him as ourselves. God kills indiscriminately and so shall we. For no creatures under God are as we are none so like him as ourselves."
Anonymous No.40834197 >>40834208 >>40834255
>>40834027
Exactly. This shit is retarded. All physical causal events that actually happen in reality are relational. Are models are abstractions, that individuate out some arbitrary defined bounded system from the continuum of the universe. Which just simply 'is'.

This dumb misinterpretation is so simple when you reduce it using first principles. If you put a detector over one slit it literally changes the wavefronts preventing the waves from interfering with one another. When you have two evenly spaced & sized slits physically they attenuate the passing EM waves. It's because these wavefronts are so close together and relatively identical in nature that their waves would usually interfere with one another. Place an "object" i.e the detector in the path of one slit, the EM waves must physically interact witg the detector which obviously impedes its path of motion & changes the social and temporal geometry of the wavefront. This means no interference with the over slits unaltered wave.
Anonymous No.40834208
>>40834197
*Spacial not social
Anonymous No.40834213
This is like the tip of the iceberg when it comes to quantum spirituality my guy.
Anonymous No.40834255 >>40834697
>>40834197
You’re making the classic mistake of confusing physical obstruction with quantum measurement. This isn’t about “wavefronts” getting “attenuated” like it’s some RF engineering problem.

The reason the interference pattern disappears when a detector is added isn’t because you “blocked the wave.” It’s because the act of measurement entangles the system with the observer, collapsing the wavefunction. That’s not philosophy, that’s core to every tested interpretation of quantum mechanics: Copenhagen, Many-Worlds, Decoherence, take your pick.

It’s not about “EM wave geometry” or “spacetime curvature from objects.” It’s about how information about which-path is accessible. Even if the detector doesn’t physically disturb the photon, the mere availability of which-path information destroys the interference. That’s been demonstrated in quantum eraser experiments again and again.

So no, it’s not “just attenuation.” It’s a fundamental property of quantum systems: once information becomes entangled with the environment, you’ve made a measurement and the superposition dies.

Learn the basics before you try to sound smart.
Anonymous No.40834263
>>40831926 (OP)
Anonymous No.40834697 >>40835478
>>40834255
This is all nonsense. The EM waves must literally interact with the atoms of the detectors surface to be detected. This obviously physically shields and distorts a real wave of energy. QM is abstract mathematics& all the interpretations that add mysticism like many worlds, superpositions, action at a distance. etc. are bullshit.
Anonymous No.40834717
>>40834027
In the double-slit experiment, particles like electrons exhibit wave-like interference patterns when unobserved, but collapse into particle-like behavior when measured. This occurs even with minimal interference from detection methods, like delayed-choice experiments, where the choice to observe is made after the particle’s path. While equipment can influence outcomes, the effect persists in setups designed to reduce such interference, suggesting observation itself (whether by consciousness or measurement) plays a role. What specific experiments or evidence support the idea that it’s purely equipment interference? Are there cases where the effect occurs without physical interaction from the detector?
Anonymous No.40834831
>>40831926 (OP)
>What’s the evidence for or against consciousness shaping reality?
There is nothing to reality *but* consciousness.

Physics only gives the rules of the entropic simulation we experience as mortal life.
Anonymous No.40835478 >>40835618
>>40834697
if it´s all nonsense why does it make sense if you factor in how your brain works?

I smell glowniggas in this thread.

Funny how you will always come to the light like moths to flames.
Anonymous No.40835618
>>40835478
glow niggers don't care for our talking points. they only care about us shooting up schools and having opportune scape goats for their pedophile overlords.