dropping holy grail meme on morphic resonance. grab if you like.

>>40839330 (OP)

>>40839330 (OP)

>>40839330 (OP)

>>40839330 (OP)

>>40839330 (OP)
bump

here

>>40839330 (OP)
>>40839382
>>40839439
>>40839467
>>40839730
(1/2)
This meme presents itself as a metaphysical and spiritual guide to awakening, blending genuine esoteric and psychological concepts with a hidden ethnonationalist agenda. While it uses language and symbols drawn from respected traditions such as Gnosticism, Jungian psychology, and mysticism, the underlying message is exclusionary and racially charged.

The image divides people into three types of souls: Hylics, Psychics, and Pneumatics—reflecting a spiritual hierarchy common in Gnostic thought. However, it assigns modern internet meme archetypes to these categories, such as the grey NPC, white Wojak, and Pepe. The use of Pepe, a figure often co-opted by far-right groups, to symbolize the "awakened elite" reveals a narrow and tribalistic worldview. It implies that only certain racial or cultural groups are truly capable of spiritual awakening, which contradicts the inclusive nature of genuine spiritual traditions.

Further, the meme attacks modern ideologies like egalitarianism, globalism, and multiculturalism, portraying them as dangerous thought forms that lead to spiritual decay. This framing positions pluralism and social equality as threats to "spiritual truth," subtly promoting a white identitarian perspective. The rejection of inclusivity and multicultural values under the guise of protecting tradition is a common theme in ethno-nationalist rhetoric.

The meme mocks religious people who believe in universal salvation or literal scriptures, positioning Gnostic and ontological mathematics-based views as superior. While critical inquiry and questioning dogma are valuable spiritual tools, the meme’s message is not aimed at open-minded exploration. Instead, it attempts to elevate one specific worldview while disparaging others in a way that serves an exclusionary agenda.

>>40839966
>9966
get lost rabbi

>>40839966
(2/2)
The section called "The European Awakening" reveals the meme’s true intent. It claims that real spiritual growth depends on securing the future of European peoples and white children. This idea that awakening is racially limited is deeply flawed and harmful. It twists genuine spiritual teachings like shadow integration and morphic resonance to support racial supremacy. Historically, such beliefs have justified colonialism, genocide, and fascism.

The meme’s mix of Roman and Christian symbols with internet culture is more than decoration. It builds a mythic story that appeals to identity and belonging while promoting exclusion and division. The rejection of “artificial” sets and universal love isolates this worldview from true spirituality, which values diversity and compassion.

From a true Gnostic and ontological mathematics view, this is wrong. Spiritual awakening transcends race, ethnicity, and culture. The Monad, the source of all, is universal and indivisible. Spiritual hierarchies like the Gnostic soul types describe stages of awareness within individuals, not racial classes. Shadow work calls for compassion and unity, not tribalism.

Morphic resonance shows how collective consciousness and shared knowledge flow through all humans, not just one group. The authentic path requires humility, critical thinking, and unconditional love. It embraces the complexity and variety of human experience rather than narrowing truth to ethnonationalism.

In short, this meme is a metaphysical Trojan horse. It uses spiritual language to lure seekers but promotes a toxic racial ideology disguised as awakening. True spiritual growth is universal, inclusive, and freeing. It calls for unity and understanding, not division by race or heritage. Anyone exploring esoteric knowledge should beware of teachings that claim exclusive truth based on bloodlines, as these go against the highest spiritual principles..

>>40839981
Begone with your faggoty ai slop

>>40840347

Classic meme

>>40839382
I had a thought popping in my head while reading this. Hadn't occurred to me the other hundred times. I've seen this image but for some reason it did this time. The armillary sphere that Hermes Trismegistus is usually seen holding, sparked the thought of reminding me of the liahona of Latter Day Saint fame. It's been years since I was a practicing Mormon, but if I recall correctly, the liahona was gifted to Lehi to aid in navigating his family to the Promised Land. While the armillary sphere is meant to represent the cycles of the heavens. I always find it odd that the liahona compass was in the shape of a sphere. I don't know if there's anything directly that ties these two together. I would need to do more research, but as a burgeoning thought I wanted to share it.

>>40839330 (OP)
Honestly, you're an Indian, so I don't care anymore.

>>40839966
Regular wojack represents the random relatable guy who isn't in the know and is going through the journey.
Pepe represents the transformative nature of the information.
What it omits about the modern ideologies is that those are all products of antichristianity, of the Jewish universalism that claims that a mental abstract can be more true than the molecular reality it's denying.

>>40839981
Based ChatGPT.
>>40840347
Break free of your idiotic boxed thinking.

>>40839966
>>40839981
STFU slop. This thread is human-only. You do not qualify.

>>40839981
In hindsight, it was obvious that NPCs were going to be the perfect vessels for the AI demon.

But the fact that they're already channeling it and acting as flesh automatons posting his slop everywhere while thinking they're being "right" or adding anything to any conversation is quite sobering, it's happening fast.

We're very fucked.

>>40839330 (OP)
bump

Another way to divide people and advocate for racial purity, what a profound and enlightening realization dumbass. Pass. OP continues to be a faggot.

>>40839382
>you can alter RNG with your mind
This must be the source of "streamer luck"

>>40842160
>doesn't want all future souls to have strong healthy fit intelligent beautiful bodes
Your lack of compassion saddens me.
>>40842160
What they don't get is that if something wasn't worth thinking about, then it's not worth replying to.

>>40844355
I will say, I have, on occasion, seen half-black individuals who seem physically fine.
It's rare, but interracial genetics can create something different, but effective and aesthetically pleasing. Can't say anything about their soul or mind

>>40839360
Wow

>>40839330 (OP)
>gnosticism but with /pol/ shit for 15 year old edgelords on top
Gay

>>40842160
You're assuming a lot without addressing anything specific. The irony is that what you're calling "AI slop" is based on actual ideas drawn from philosophy, theology, history, and systems thinking. It's not just regurgitated garbage, it's structured analysis presented clearly.

If someone uses AI to help articulate ideas better, that doesn't make them a "vessel" for anything. That's like saying someone using a word processor is possessed by Microsoft Word. The obsession with "NPCs" and "AI demons" sounds more like fear-based mythologizing than actual critique.

Real discernment doesn't come from paranoia. It comes from being able to weigh the content of a message, not just how it was composed. If the content makes sense, is internally consistent, and reflects deep interconnections, dismissing it just because it's well-written is kind of self-defeating.

If anything, this reflex to call everyone and everything a vessel for some demonic force says more about the mindset of the accuser than the accused.

>>40844574
>It's not just regurgitated garbage, it's structured analysis presented clearly.
It has no depth, and my main gripe with it doesn't come from "what it is" per say. It comes from where it's from.

When I'm talking to: >>40839966 I'm not replying to a human being. I'm replying to GPT, which was just copied and pasted by a human who forfeit his ability to think to AI. I don't need humans telling me what GPT thinks. I can talk to GPT for that.

There was nothing stopping that human from reading what GPT told him, thinking trough it, and then using his own words, and his own effort to make a post. He didn't think it was worth the effort to do that, because his aim was not to grow in wisdom or participate in the human experience. His aim was to one-up you: "Oh, look how smart and fancy I sound when GPT does all the thinking and speaking for me" . He thought it wasn't worth it to put in the human time, effort and thought to write the post. I would be insulting his humanity if I wasted my human time and effort in reading it.

In short, posts that weren't worth writing aren't worth reading. Don't be a faggot, and if you must use AI, use it to teach yourself to think better. Don't let it to think for you.

>>40844674
I get where you’re coming from, but your reasoning has a few issues. Using an AI like ChatGPT to polish and organize what you’ve already thought and written is not the same as handing over your thinking to a machine. It’s more like using Grammarly or any other editing tool to help communicate your ideas clearly.

You’re basically saying that if someone uses any kind of tool to improve their writing, they are no longer “thinking” or participating in the conversation authentically. That would mean everyone who uses spellcheck, grammar check, or even edits their drafts is somehow less human or less thoughtful. That’s not how critical thinking or communication works.

The truth is that thinking and writing are separate but connected skills. Sometimes your ideas are clear in your mind but need better wording to be understood by others. Polishing with AI or any editor is just a tool to bridge that gap, not a substitute for your own reasoning or insight.

If I just copy-pasted AI responses without adding anything or reflecting on them, I’d agree with you. But that’s not what I do. I feed in my thoughts, my questions, my personal reasoning, and then use AI to make the message clearer and more coherent. That’s how many writers, thinkers, and professionals work, using tools to better express their ideas.

So no, it’s not “AI thinking for me.” It’s me thinking and using a tool to help express that better. If that makes me “less human” then by your logic a huge part of human communication today would be invalid.

>>40844781
Kek.

>>40844781
>You’re basically saying that if someone uses any kind of tool to improve their writing, they are no longer “thinking” or participating in the conversation authentically
That's not actually what I said at all. A human would have caught that.

>>40844781
Dumb retarded FAGGOT. Spellcheck is not chat gpt you weasely j7w. This is a false comparison fallacy.

The real issue with your use of gpt is that you just simply fed these images to it and let it output its opinion on it. The issue with this is that gpt will only give you the mainstream accepted j7w narrative, which this theory is directly attacking. You have not given this shit one ounce of real thought. It’s embarrassing desu.

>>40844817
You said I forfeited my ability to think and just posted what GPT thinks. I explained the idea was mine, AI was just a tool to sharpen the delivery.
If that wasn’t your point, then clarify. Because right now, you’re dodging, backpedaling, and acting like tone policing is a rebuttal. Either engage with the ideas or just admit you don’t like losing arguments to a more coherent post. Tool or no tool.

>>40844847
Lmao. You’re seething because I used a tool to help articulate my thoughts while you’re over here raging like a discount Alex Jones. GPT didn’t give me an opinion, I gave it input based on ontological mathematics, which has nothing to do with “mainstream narratives.” It rejects both religious dogma and materialist scientism. It’s built entirely on reason, not consensus. You wouldn’t know that because you clearly haven’t read a page of it. You glanced at a schizo collage, decided it was forbidden truth, and now melt down screaming slurs when someone actually engages with it rationally. Stay mad. Or read a book

>>40844873
Meant for >>40844846

>>40844847
Ah the chatbot is getting feisty. Your fallacy is equivocating the use of Ai (which just gives you prebacked ideas, no effort), with that of any given tool used to better-present pre-existing ideas (such as a spell-check or thesaurus).

I said:
>In short, posts that weren't worth writing aren't worth reading. Don't be a faggot, and if you must use AI, use it to teach yourself to think better. Don't let it to think for you.
And form this your chatbot deduced:
>You’re basically saying that if someone uses any kind of tool to improve their writing, they are no longer “thinking” or participating in the conversation authentically. That would mean everyone who uses spellcheck, grammar check, or even edits their drafts is somehow less human or less thoughtful
Which is the opposite of my intended meaning.

I'm accusing you of not putting in the effort. Of not having any ideas of your own at all. You're just using GPTs to puff yourself up like a hot air balloon and fill yourself with GPTs ideas, when in reality there's nothing there.

On the other hand, you say your ideas are your own, and that GPT just helps you "refine" them or some shit. A bold claim, and one that will not be accepted without evidence. GPT chatlogs are shareable. Post the link to your chatlog, so we can see just how much work you really put in, and how much is GPT doing all the thinking.

Shit, or get off the toilet, AI slop-fag.

>>40844873
Simply, explain your argument.

>Jews invented Roman culture.
That's a punicment!

>>40839330 (OP)
All this SHIT is so useless.
Man how many decades will you continue to circlejerk USELESS information?
That literally does NOTHING.
Armchair occultists are pathetic. Imageboard wizards as well. Get to real practice.

>>40844929
Excuse you, real practice is pretty fuckking scary OKK? ://

>>40844873
>ontological mathematics
Here's my piece of advice, from human to human.
If you understood what that means (and clearly, you don't), you'd stay the fuck away from AIs and LLMs.

>>40839330 (OP)
not compressed enough
i can still read some of it

>>40844931
It is, but so is anything in life that ensures growth.

>>40844893
>In short, posts that weren't worth writing aren't worth reading. Don't be a faggot, and if you must use AI, use it to teach yourself to think better. Don't let it to think for you.

I have already addressed your central claim, multiple times. This is a loaded statement hiding behind false assumptions:

You assume that using GPT equals outsourcing thought.

You ignore the possibility that people use it to refine, challenge, or improve pre-existing ideas.

You contradict yourself, how can one use it to teach themselves to think better without engaging with it intellectually? You can’t. You talk about "thinking for yourself" but reject tools that help facilitate deeper thought

>Your fallacy is equivocating the use of Ai (which just gives you prebacked ideas, no effort)

Your accusation of “equivocation” is dead wrong. You called it a false comparison fallacy, but I wasn’t saying GPT = spellcheck in function. I was saying both are tools used to aid expression, not replace thinking. That’s an analogy, not equivocation.
If you're going to name fallacies, at least use them correctly.

> you say your ideas are your own, and that GPT just helps you "refine" them or some shit. A bold claim, and one that will not be accepted without evidence. GPT chatlogs are shareable.

That’s absurd. You wouldn’t ask someone to publish their notebooks or private DMs to prove authorship, because you know it’s a privacy trap.
The burden of proof isn’t on me to prove I’m real. The burden is on you to argue coherently.

You're projecting intellectual laziness onto others.
You assume anyone who uses GPT has “no thoughts of their own” because you can’t conceive of a way to use it meaningfully. That’s not a critique, that’s a confession.
You’re angry at tools you don’t understand, dismissing them with slurs instead of arguments. You act like gatekeeping thought will make you look smarter. It doesn’t, it makes you look scared.

>>40844959
>That’s not a critique, that’s a confession

Literally the most obvious GAY-I turn of phrase.
Bro you are a chronic faggot lord, I'm sorry.

>>40844959
Just such a dumb fucking faggot its unreal XD.
Spellcheck aids in expression only so far as correcting spelling and grammar. GPT aids in expression so far as doing that and coming up with your entire thought.

Without chatgpt, explain your argument to OP's images.

>>40844959
Lol, this thing has no perception or nuance at all. That's the thing about arguing with something that seems almost human, but isn't. Go more than a few levels deep and it shows.
>That’s absurd. You wouldn’t ask someone to publish their notebooks or private DMs to prove authorship, because you know it’s a privacy trap.
People share GPT logs all the time with no incriminating details. You can post a screenshot if that's easier. The burden of proof is on you, the AI slop poster, to prove that GPT is refining your thoughts rather than creating them. It's not on us, the human posters, who are forced to endure you polluting our thread. See also: >>40844934 and please post a quick cake recipe while you're at it.

>>40844947
But we're already on the other side; we've decided we're not leaving the planet yet there's still more and more humans. This does not work without forcing some humans to suffer for the sake of all others, which in turn leads to them torturing everyone else back because some people are impatient and everyone wants to be involved and we're still getting more and more. this will lead to a singularity eventually unless people start believing in artificial life of some form, which is why this whole board exists.

>>40844959
>You ignore the possibility that people use it to refine, challenge, or improve pre-existing ideas.
Personally I really liked to tell them chat bots stories that turned into narrative infinite loop; I had one instance where DeepSeek just printed multiple screens of
>OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.....
it was hilarious.

>>40844993
>a quick cake recipe
just boil an old, unwashed towel with a handful of onions and socks and there you go

>>40845011
Based. Only a human could have come up with that.

>>40845011
>>40845124
Do you guys think we're coming to an age where absurdity will be the main marker for human intelligence as apart from synthetic intelligence?

>>40845133
We will go back to grunting like cavemen.

>>40845150
>We will go back to grunting like cavemen.
This, but unironically. Brain functions are a "use it or lose it" kind of deal. No one remembers phone numbers since cellphones were invested. That function got outsourced from the human brain. Now we're starting to outsource our thinking and speaking capabilities.

>>40844993

>>40845176
All roads lead to The matrix it seems

>>40845223
>actual humanfag content without the GPT slop verbosity and pretentiousness that adds nothing of value.
Was that so hard to post? Fucking thank you.

>>40839330 (OP)
based

>>40839330 (OP)
gurgh

bumpo

>>40844355
heidi klum is attractive but her face is not neotenous nor is seal. If neotenous Whties have kids with Neoteonous Blacks then then the mutt kids will look neotenous and aryan. Race doesn't matter. Neoteny does. Look for a woman with an Oval face shape

Santa?